Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • EITHER YOU’RE PART OF THE EUROPEAN SOLUTION OR PART OF THE GLOBALIST PROBLEM My

    EITHER YOU’RE PART OF THE EUROPEAN SOLUTION OR PART OF THE GLOBALIST PROBLEM

    My disdain for abrahamic religions comes from the fact that (a) they’re lies (b) they destroyed the ancient world, (c) created a thousand year dark age (d) and have been reconstructed as globalism, marxism, feminism, and postmodernism in the modern, in an attempt to achieve in the modern what they achieved in the ancient.

    You can try to make excuses for desiring lies and promoting lies, that you have malinvested in, despite being lies – but my job is to restore western civilization (truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity, and markets in everything), and that means ALL lies.

    And either you are part of the European Solution, or part of the Globalist Problem.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-07 19:51:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. FRAMING A HOSTILE DISCOURSE: WHAT DO YOU WANT

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    FRAMING A HOSTILE DISCOURSE: WHAT DO YOU WANT AND WHAT WILL YOU EXCHANGE FOR IT?

    ( Once you memorize these ten points you can use them as replies one at a time as you see fit. )

    Well before we start, let’s state the obvious.

    1) Cooperation is only valuable until it’s not. Cooperation ceases being valuable when alternatives are preferable. The alternatives are preferable for me and mine, regardless of whether they are preferable for you and yours. Ergo: there is no ‘we’.

    2) I cooperate with my family, kin, friends, associates, partners, and allies with whom I share mutually beneficial interests. I am not your family, kin, friend, associate, partner, or ally, but your enemy, and you are mine until demonstrated otherwise.

    3) In other words, I start with the presumption that you are of no value, or worse, a parasite or worse, a predator, and that your pleasure or pain, life or death, are irrelevant to me and mine I discover some reason that you and yours’ non-existence is preferable to your existence.

    4) I solve, and consider moral and ethical for me and mine, only that which is in the interest of me and mine, regardless of whether it is in the interest of you and yours.

    5) As such I solve only for truthful, fully informed, voluntary, mutually beneficial exchanges in the absence of all attempts at harm, theft, coercion, fraud, free riding.

    6) As such criticism, ridicule, shaming, putting words in my mouth, mis-framing my statements, lying, rallying, gossiping, and threats of non-cooperation, or even open hostility are irrelevant to me. They are just attempts at theft, fraud, free riding, and deprivation of opportunity to cooperate with you – despite my and mine’s lack of interest in cooperating with you.

    7) All that matters is what you and yours will exchange with me and mine that benefits me and mine.

    8) If not, Civil War, Separation, Conquest and Genocide are preferable to the status quo.

    9) Again, Cooperation is only valuable until it’s not, and conflict is preferable to parasitism and predation. So either we are seeking a set of truthful, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges, free of imposition of cost upon others by externality, or you are seeking to engage in theft, fraud, parasitism, or predation.

    10) So what is it you want, and what are you willing to trade for it?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-07 19:30:34 UTC

  • Framing a Hostile Discourse: What Do You Want and What Will You Exchange for It?

    ( Once you memorize these ten points you can use them as replies one at a time as you see fit. ) Well before we start, let’s state the obvious. 1) Cooperation is only valuable until it’s not. Cooperation ceases being valuable when alternatives are preferable. The alternatives are preferable for me and mine, regardless of whether they are preferable for you and yours. Ergo: there is no ‘we’. 2) I cooperate with my family, kin, friends, associates, partners, and allies with whom I share mutually beneficial interests. I am not your family, kin, friend, associate, partner, or ally, but your enemy, and you are mine until demonstrated otherwise. 3) In other words, I start with the presumption that you are of no value, or worse, a parasite or worse, a predator, and that your pleasure or pain, life or death, are irrelevant to me and mine I discover some reason that you and yours’ non-existence is preferable to your existence. 4) I solve, and consider moral and ethical for me and mine, only that which is in the interest of me and mine, regardless of whether it is in the interest of you and yours. 5) As such I solve only for truthful, fully informed, voluntary, mutually beneficial exchanges in the absence of all attempts at harm, theft, coercion, fraud, free riding. 6) As such criticism, ridicule, shaming, putting words in my mouth, mis-framing my statements, lying, rallying, gossiping, and threats of non-cooperation, or even open hostility are irrelevant to me. They are just attempts at theft, fraud, free riding, and deprivation of opportunity to cooperate with you – despite my and mine’s lack of interest in cooperating with you. 7) All that matters is what you and yours will exchange with me and mine that benefits me and mine. 8) If not, Civil War, Separation, Conquest and Genocide are preferable to the status quo. 9) Again, Cooperation is only valuable until it’s not, and conflict is preferable to parasitism and predation. So either we are seeking a set of truthful, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges, free of imposition of cost upon others by externality, or you are seeking to engage in theft, fraud, parasitism, or predation. 10) So what is it you want, and what are you willing to trade for it?

  • Framing a Hostile Discourse: What Do You Want and What Will You Exchange for It?

    ( Once you memorize these ten points you can use them as replies one at a time as you see fit. ) Well before we start, let’s state the obvious. 1) Cooperation is only valuable until it’s not. Cooperation ceases being valuable when alternatives are preferable. The alternatives are preferable for me and mine, regardless of whether they are preferable for you and yours. Ergo: there is no ‘we’. 2) I cooperate with my family, kin, friends, associates, partners, and allies with whom I share mutually beneficial interests. I am not your family, kin, friend, associate, partner, or ally, but your enemy, and you are mine until demonstrated otherwise. 3) In other words, I start with the presumption that you are of no value, or worse, a parasite or worse, a predator, and that your pleasure or pain, life or death, are irrelevant to me and mine I discover some reason that you and yours’ non-existence is preferable to your existence. 4) I solve, and consider moral and ethical for me and mine, only that which is in the interest of me and mine, regardless of whether it is in the interest of you and yours. 5) As such I solve only for truthful, fully informed, voluntary, mutually beneficial exchanges in the absence of all attempts at harm, theft, coercion, fraud, free riding. 6) As such criticism, ridicule, shaming, putting words in my mouth, mis-framing my statements, lying, rallying, gossiping, and threats of non-cooperation, or even open hostility are irrelevant to me. They are just attempts at theft, fraud, free riding, and deprivation of opportunity to cooperate with you – despite my and mine’s lack of interest in cooperating with you. 7) All that matters is what you and yours will exchange with me and mine that benefits me and mine. 8) If not, Civil War, Separation, Conquest and Genocide are preferable to the status quo. 9) Again, Cooperation is only valuable until it’s not, and conflict is preferable to parasitism and predation. So either we are seeking a set of truthful, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges, free of imposition of cost upon others by externality, or you are seeking to engage in theft, fraud, parasitism, or predation. 10) So what is it you want, and what are you willing to trade for it?

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. TRUTH IS ENOUGH. IF IT ISN”T ENOUGH FOR SOME,

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    TRUTH IS ENOUGH. IF IT ISN”T ENOUGH FOR SOME, THEY ARE NOT ABLE. ARISTOCRACY IS GOVERNANCE BY THE ABLE.

    —“Do you ever worry that you’re making enemies out of people not worth making enemies out of? Don’t you think there are bigger fish to fry than the largely apathetic Christians in the world today?”–Collin Turney

    I worry about what is true, since what is true is the reason for our group evolutionary success. If something is not true, I do not make exceptions, because i fail the test of reciprocity with those who also engage in comforting falsehoods (the left).

    There is a cost of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and prosperity. It is intolerance for falsehood. Even the falsehoods we cherish.

    —“That doesn’t answer my question. Don’t you think there are bigger fish to fry? You’ve been frying this fish for how long?I’m not so sure your return on investment is too good, in that you have most likely lost many good potential students who realistically would be on board with most of what you say…It doesn’t seem like good optics if you’re trying to gain a following.”—Collin Turney

    There are very few readers of the WSJ. But they are the only readers that matter. There are many readers of all other media.. But they don’t matter.

    The kind of people that follow falsehoods are not the kind of people that matter. What matters is the people who can enforce a constitution of natural law.

    I don’t appeal to the gutter.

    —“The point is to shift the Overton window, not to ignore it.”—Collin Turney

    That’s someone else’s problem. My problem is how to govern once we have power. That’s a problem no one else as solved.

    In fact. I don’t see anyone doing anything meaningful. And that all progress is being achieved by nothing more than demographics and the duration of frustration by both sides.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-07 16:11:06 UTC

  • TRUTH IS ENOUGH. IF IT ISN”T ENOUGH FOR SOME, THEY ARE NOT ABLE. ARISTOCRACY IS

    TRUTH IS ENOUGH. IF IT ISN”T ENOUGH FOR SOME, THEY ARE NOT ABLE. ARISTOCRACY IS GOVERNANCE BY THE ABLE.

    —“Do you ever worry that you’re making enemies out of people not worth making enemies out of? Don’t you think there are bigger fish to fry than the largely apathetic Christians in the world today?”–Collin Turney

    I worry about what is true, since what is true is the reason for our group evolutionary success. If something is not true, I do not make exceptions, because i fail the test of reciprocity with those who also engage in comforting falsehoods (the left).

    There is a cost of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and prosperity. It is intolerance for falsehood. Even the falsehoods we cherish.

    —“That doesn’t answer my question. Don’t you think there are bigger fish to fry? You’ve been frying this fish for how long?I’m not so sure your return on investment is too good, in that you have most likely lost many good potential students who realistically would be on board with most of what you say…It doesn’t seem like good optics if you’re trying to gain a following.”—Collin Turney

    There are very few readers of the WSJ. But they are the only readers that matter. There are many readers of all other media.. But they don’t matter.

    The kind of people that follow falsehoods are not the kind of people that matter. What matters is the people who can enforce a constitution of natural law.

    I don’t appeal to the gutter.

    —“The point is to shift the Overton window, not to ignore it.”—Collin Turney

    That’s someone else’s problem. My problem is how to govern once we have power. That’s a problem no one else as solved.

    In fact. I don’t see anyone doing anything meaningful. And that all progress is being achieved by nothing more than demographics and the duration of frustration by both sides.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-07 12:11:00 UTC

  • We have identified a series of governments from autocratic (war/deprivation), to

    We have identified a series of governments from autocratic (war/deprivation), to classical (production/merit), to liberal (periods of wealth/redistribution), and yet to define a means of transferring between them any better than that of the Romans.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-07 00:29:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1015392322991939584

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE PERFECT RULE IS RULE OF LAW – BUT THE PER

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE PERFECT RULE IS RULE OF LAW – BUT THE PERFECT GOVERNMENT IS CONDITIONAL UPON CIRCUMSTANCES

    We have identified a series of governments from autocratic (war/deprivation), to classical (production/merit), to liberal (periods of wealth/redistribution), and yet to define a means of transferring between them any better than that of the Romans.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-07 00:29:19 UTC

  • We’re only a minority if we remain under the same political structure

    We’re only a minority if we remain under the same political structure.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-06 23:48:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1015382084125413376

    Reply addressees: @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1015359977165185024

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1015359977165185024

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE RUSSIANS DIDN’T DO JACK. OK? HERE IS THE

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE RUSSIANS DIDN’T DO JACK. OK? HERE IS THE DATA

    —“Of course, such assertions don’t hold up to empirical scrutiny. Zuckerberg first came under congressional pressure over $10,000 worth of Russian-bought Facebook ads. Not all of them were even explicitly political: Of the roughly 3,500 Facebook ads traced back to Russia, only about 100 mentioned support for President Trump or opposition to Clinton.

    Are we really supposed to believe that $10,000 and 100 ads felled the billion-dollar Clinton machine — the epitome of political establishment? Or, could it be Americans simply rejected an out-of-touch liberal they didn’t like and couldn’t trust?”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-06 23:21:48 UTC