Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • 4) Trump is an ally of the alt right simply because he is pursuing a strategy of

    4) Trump is an ally of the alt right simply because he is pursuing a strategy of nationalism and the restoration of the balance of powers instead of the single superpower of America that is too expensive for Americans to continue paying for.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 21:24:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024043071552610306

    Reply addressees: @Aremazu19

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024025534467121153

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024025534467121153

  • 3) the movement is merely a cyclical return to nationalism in the face of immigr

    3) the movement is merely a cyclical return to nationalism in the face of immigration – first Hispanic since hispanics have one to one replacement of whites, but secondly and more emphatically, muslim immigration which we perceive as even more hostile than jewish.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 21:24:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024042983925194754

    Reply addressees: @Aremazu19

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024025534467121153

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024025534467121153

  • 1) The correct framing would be that the current generation of thinkers has adop

    1) The correct framing would be that the current generation of thinkers has adopted the marxist techniques (ridicule, shaming, rallying) simply by being exposed to them for decades.
    2) The movement was made possible by a)end of socialism, b) genetics, c) cog sci (d)immigration.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 21:23:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024042735945347074

    Reply addressees: @Aremazu19

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024025534467121153

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024025534467121153

  • Universal Suffrage Is Incompatible with Freedom

    by Steve Pender The founders accepted democracy only because they had set what they thought were sufficient restrictions to prevent past problems of democracy. Only white (the same stock as the founders), male (those who bear the cost of land ownership/defense), landowners (skin in the game, proven interest in long-term settlement, majority of taxpayers) could vote in the American “democracy”. Universal suffrage is provably incompatible with long-term freedom since varying levels of skin in the game create voting arbitrage opportunities for the free-riding side (vote for something that benefits you, at the expense of others who pay higher cost).

  • Universal Suffrage Is Incompatible with Freedom

    by Steve Pender The founders accepted democracy only because they had set what they thought were sufficient restrictions to prevent past problems of democracy. Only white (the same stock as the founders), male (those who bear the cost of land ownership/defense), landowners (skin in the game, proven interest in long-term settlement, majority of taxpayers) could vote in the American “democracy”. Universal suffrage is provably incompatible with long-term freedom since varying levels of skin in the game create voting arbitrage opportunities for the free-riding side (vote for something that benefits you, at the expense of others who pay higher cost).

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. JOHN MARK ON MARKETING MARKET FASCISM AS THE

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    JOHN MARK ON MARKETING MARKET FASCISM AS THE NEXT STEP IN DEMOCRACY

    —“As we market/promote a new and improved governmental system with propertarian/natural law tenets etc, is it wiser to speak of it (market/promote/educate) as “a new form of democracy” (and explain the part about houses/markets etc), or to call it something else (because obviously full franchise democracy doesn’t work, and we don’t want people thinking it will be full franchise direct democracy).”— John Mark

    Well I think of it as market democracy rather than monopoly democracy and if we explain that it solves the problem of either side winning only the moral will agree and only the immoral disagree.

    And then we know who to exit from the polity: the immoral.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 20:15:14 UTC

  • John Mark on Marketing Market Fascism as The Next Step in Democracy

    —“As we market/promote a new and improved governmental system with propertarian/natural law tenets etc, is it wiser to speak of it (market/promote/educate) as “a new form of democracy” (and explain the part about houses/markets etc), or to call it something else (because obviously full franchise democracy doesn’t work, and we don’t want people thinking it will be full franchise direct democracy).”— John Mark Well I think of it as market democracy rather than monopoly democracy and if we explain that it solves the problem of either side winning only the moral will agree and only the immoral disagree. And then we know who to exit from the polity: the immoral.

  • John Mark on Marketing Market Fascism as The Next Step in Democracy

    —“As we market/promote a new and improved governmental system with propertarian/natural law tenets etc, is it wiser to speak of it (market/promote/educate) as “a new form of democracy” (and explain the part about houses/markets etc), or to call it something else (because obviously full franchise democracy doesn’t work, and we don’t want people thinking it will be full franchise direct democracy).”— John Mark Well I think of it as market democracy rather than monopoly democracy and if we explain that it solves the problem of either side winning only the moral will agree and only the immoral disagree. And then we know who to exit from the polity: the immoral.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH FREED

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH FREEDOM
    by Steve Pender

    The founders accepted democracy only because they had set what they thought were sufficient restrictions to prevent past problems of democracy.

    Only white (the same stock as the founders), male (those who bear the cost of land ownership/defense), landowners (skin in the game, proven interest in long-term settlement, majority of taxpayers) could vote in the American “democracy”.

    Universal suffrage is provably incompatible with long-term freedom since varying levels of skin in the game create voting arbitrage opportunities for the free-riding side (vote for something that benefits you, at the expense of others who pay higher cost).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 19:31:10 UTC

  • JOHN MARK ON MARKETING MARKET FASCISM AS THE NEXT STEP IN DEMOCRACY —“As we ma

    JOHN MARK ON MARKETING MARKET FASCISM AS THE NEXT STEP IN DEMOCRACY

    —“As we market/promote a new and improved governmental system with propertarian/natural law tenets etc, is it wiser to speak of it (market/promote/educate) as “a new form of democracy” (and explain the part about houses/markets etc), or to call it something else (because obviously full franchise democracy doesn’t work, and we don’t want people thinking it will be full franchise direct democracy).”— John Mark

    Well I think of it as market democracy rather than monopoly democracy and if we explain that it solves the problem of either side winning only the moral will agree and only the immoral disagree.

    And then we know who to exit from the polity: the immoral.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 16:15:00 UTC