Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • RT @WarintheFuture: The latest #Ukraine update from @TheStudyofWar and @critical

    RT @WarintheFuture: The latest #Ukraine update from @TheStudyofWar and @criticalthreats


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-27 04:36:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751101963616366610

  • RT @whignewtons: Another reason to note that Trump/populism/gender divide isn’t

    RT @whignewtons: Another reason to note that Trump/populism/gender divide isn’t an American phenomenon. All explanations have to explain wh…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-27 02:53:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751075840492704067

  • RT @oldbooksguy: Men are from Mars Women are from the Karl Marx School of Econom

    RT @oldbooksguy: Men are from Mars

    Women are from the Karl Marx School of Economics

    DEI politics and toxic compassion are civilization’s…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-27 02:49:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751074828583330117

  • So let me ask an odd question. Why is there such a prohibiton on debate? Or, is

    So let me ask an odd question. Why is there such a prohibiton on debate? Or, is it that there is only a prohibition on that debate’s visibility beyond the leadership?

    Why is dissent so feared and response to it so intolerant?

    I mean, I quite honestly can’t really imagine it.…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:21:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751007530472370654

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751005697217798366

  • PERFECT GOVERNMENT ISN”T DIFFICULT – IF YOU HAVE DECIDABILITY **The Iron Law of

    PERFECT GOVERNMENT ISN”T DIFFICULT – IF YOU HAVE DECIDABILITY

    **The Iron Law of Oligarchy leads to the necessity of Monarchy, and monarchy leads to the necessity of the Natural Law of Decidability.**

    Competing Interests > decisions > oligarchy > objections > Monarchy >…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 21:20:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750992041851437476

  • RT @curtdoolittle: BE GRATEFUL FOR ENGLAND AND THE UK And be grateful for the re

    RT @curtdoolittle: BE GRATEFUL FOR ENGLAND AND THE UK
    And be grateful for the remaining monarchies.
    They are the last defense against globa…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 21:06:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750988706603823338

  • “WE DON’T HAVE A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT – WE HAVE A FERAL ONE.” Well, we had a Feral

    “WE DON’T HAVE A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT – WE HAVE A FERAL ONE.”

    Well, we had a Feral people, with a Feral culture and a Feral Religion immigrated to the west, produced a Feral Academy, produced a Feral media, produced a Feral female population, who produced feral offspring, who has voted in a Feral government, and brought about a Feral society, leading to ungovernable Feral cities, and immigrating ungovernable Feral people.

    And the previously less developed people of the world now hate the west for encouraging that the less developed people convert into Feral academy, media, population and government just like theh west.

    And of course, they’re saying that their relative economic condition isn’t worth converting a less economically and institutionally developed people into a feral people, media, academy, state, culture and suicide along with the West.

    So you know, how do you fix a feral anything?
    You domesticate it.
    And, that’s the job unfortunately.
    And it means taking responsibility for doing the domesticating.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 20:56:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750986178021486594

  • THE LEFT WAS WRONG – WE DIVERGED – BUT THEN OVER TIME THE LEFT IS ALWAYS WRONG.

    THE LEFT WAS WRONG – WE DIVERGED – BUT THEN OVER TIME THE LEFT IS ALWAYS WRONG.
    Feminine intuition doesn’t scale.
    @ScottAdamsSays

    Of course.
    (a) The left assumed we would converge – the left is feminine, It cannot imagine anything violating feminine solipsism.
    (b) However we (the sexes) have diverged – not really. The feminine have diverged from the masculine, just as the left has diverged from the center, while the right has barely moved.
    (c) Because we no longer have a need to compromise with one another
    (d) Because while we remain reproductively dependent we are no longer economically socially and politically dependent.
    (e) Because it is possible to externalize our intertemporal costs to others in the polity through taxes and redistribution without family formation and intergenerational production of population.

    So yeah. Men and women will continue to diverge, populations will continue to crash, until we restore the necessity of production of families in order to obtain the benefits of modern institutions of insurance at scale.

    So yeah.
    It’s just science.
    The science of incentives.
    But god forbid the left accept science if it conflicts with their genetic predisposition to solipsism and feminine rent seeking, baiting into hazard, free riding, in pursuit of unearned hyperconsumption. 😉

    They’re just women, and women are just sexually mature children – they never mature beyond the self and the empathizable. It a takes men longer to mature because men mature more – across time and space. So get over it and do something about it. 😉

    Men have to be responsible beyond the empathic into the systemic because only men are capable of responsibility both instinctually, intuitively, emotionally, cognitively, and intellectually with sufficiency to organize polities that don’t collapse from feminine irresponsible hyperconsumption the absence of production of offspring.

    Cheers
    -cd

    Reply addressees: @y_gebregiorgis @ch35614


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 18:39:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750951491051966464

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750944576041287969

  • ANTI-ISRAEL? WHY NOT PRO ISRAEL? Hmmm… Support them there so they go there? If

    ANTI-ISRAEL? WHY NOT PRO ISRAEL?
    Hmmm… Support them there so they go there? If you don’t support them there, more will come to you? While there are only 6-7M Jews in israel, there are about the same number 6.3M in the USA. And smaller numbers in France (440,000), Canada (398,000), the United Kingdom (312,000), Argentina (171,000), Russia (132,000), Germany (125,000), and Australia (117,200). So under 2M outside of Israel and the USA. They are only safe in the anglosphere and broader germanosphere at present it seems.

    Conversely, israel, with a population of an additional eight millon, jews, totalling under 15M, would approximate the population of the Netherlands, and it’s per capita GDP of 50k, and total economy of 1T. This would have (and have to have) an extraordinarily positive strategic, economic, educational, and eventually cultural impact on the middle east, assisting them in their slow ascent out of supernatural m aysticism ignorance, mandated non-education, and economic subsistence without the oil revenues.

    WHAT ABOUT THE NEGATIVE EFFECT OF JEWS IN THE WEST?
    Of course we could just make a few adjustments in our laws to prevent baiting into hazard, privatizing gains and socializing losses.

    And we could outlaw sedition using the female to feminine to abrahamic-to-marxist sequence – so that we we equally suppressed feminine jewish abrahamic marxist antisocial behavior. Because feminine behavior is genetic, instinctual, and all but unsuppressable, especially their antisocial behavior.

    And we could return all credit expansion to the treasury and end the coercive and rent seeking power of the private financial sector, and vastly increase the treasury without increased taxation – perhaps even replacing taxation.

    And of course (my) our organization has prepared all that constitutional law as permanent amendments. So it’s easily done.

    And then it wouldn’t matter that jewish group evolutionary strategy, jewish instinct, and jewish culture was just the expression of female sedition against males by means of seduction into baiting into hazard and subsequent rent seeking, instead of earnings from production and reciprocal exchange free of negative externalities. 😉

    But then as usual I’m probably talking over heads…. Hopefully someone catches on, a little at a time. 😉

    We dont need to keep adding to the list of 109 explosions and we don’t need any more violence. We only need to domesticate women and jews, just as we have domesticated other groups in europe, on group, one class at a time. It’s just that women and jews together during teh 20th were a bit much when we were christian conservatives and foolishly optimistic as hour hight trust society and culture teach us… despite that it’s also a vulnerability as well as a benefit.z

    Codify the feminie-jewish-abrahamic- marxist sequence as what it is: crime. And institutionalize it in our legal code. And purge that behavior from our polities forever, just as we have incrementally purged all other antisocial behavior.

    Because male antisocial behavior is more obvious and urgent we acted on it first. But now that we can industrialize liying sedition and rent seeking and parasitism through indirect institutional means we must also suppress the feminine as thoroughly as we have suppressed the masculine.

    From my standpoint I see women and jews as an asset just as I see other europeans as an asset or all higher performing people as an asset. The difference is we did not force jewish integration and they instead undermined our demand for integration and the consequence has been horrific. That said, ‘fixing’ the problem of the feminine isn’t that difficult as I’ve roughly outlined above. So why not preserve the asset even if there is a short term cost to it. And even if we should have made this legal change already regarding women independent of the jewish baiting of women into their strategy of sedition.

    Of course it takes political power to do so and that might men we cannot do so democratically, but must do so responsibly by ‘other means”.

    With humor and affection
    By painful truth regardless
    For the betterment of all

    C Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @AndrewJV123 @auny_marie


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 18:27:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750948669099020289

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750936151903363317

  • TEXAS DOESN’T NEED THE USA – HERE’S WHY: There is no central bank other than the

    TEXAS DOESN’T NEED THE USA – HERE’S WHY:
    There is no central bank other than the central banking system that is a collection of regional central banks. Texas has one of the central banks, a treasury and can print money. It has its own ports, its own fuel, it’s own electrical grid, and is responsible for 15% of total US trade and is the top US trading partner. As a separate country, with an economy of $2.4 trillion, Texas would be the eight largest economy in the world, just behind India, the UK and France, and ahead of Canada, Russia and Italy. Texas has a population approaching that of Canada, and at 120,000 it has more armed forces than any state other than California, and the Virginia-Georgia-North-Carolina military ‘core’. And its armed civilian conservative population is six times the size of the military’s fighting capacity. And the military has lost every war against domestics it’s ever fought. There are only three US cities capable of fielding police forces of any number in an uprising – and many of those men would choose sides. You have no knowledge of just now little power developed countries have against their own population. Advanced countries keep order by the utility of their economies not because they can apply force against the population,. Compare with Russia where the majority of the government does the exact opposite. If texas were to seceded, reduce private and corporate taxes, and produce a currency of its own backed by say, oil, it would cause capital flight to texas on a scale comparable only to the UK flight to the USA during and after the world wars. Subsequently the central agrarian territories of the USA and central and western canada would secede and join Texas. The south would follow. And the coasts, the rust belt would be successful but strategically weak isolates. This would destroy the dollar a sthe world reserve currency, and destroy the capacity of the USA to field a military and diplomatic corps capable of

    Now, while most of my time is spent on constitutional, legal economic, and policy reform, this kind of thing – geostrategic competition – is my job. But do you think there aren’t dozens of men like me in the state department, intelligence, military intelligence, and general staff, and military wings of the government that don’t understand this just as well as I do? The demarcation between those of us who do and those who don’t, is whether we understand total war, including economic and demographic war and the interdependence between them.

    The difference between those folks and the few of us in the private sector, is that if you’re dependent on US funds for research, like Rand or other think tanks, you can’t say it. If you’re paid by the federal government you can’t say it. If you’re paid by investors you can’t say it. But I’m paid by myself and private donors. So I can say what they can’t.

    That doesn’t mean they wouldn’t say it if they could.

    It is not at all clear, that given the disdain for the USA is due to what the world perceives as “coastal immoral degenerate hedonism” riding on american military and economic power, that the world wouldn’t be far better off without the end of coastal influence on not only the rest of the country but on world affairs in general.

    People around the world have no problem with rule of law and the proceeds. They are not so sure about democracy. And the yare not at all sure about capitalism. But they are very sure about the marxist-to-woke religion of degeneracy that they see as destroying their culture and harmony between classes and sexes, at the cost of the family and love and security it provides.

    In fact, secession, isolating the coasts, causing responsible people to flee the cities to the responsible territories, forming new moral cities, and leaving decadent cities with an elite core, an impoverished circle around it, might in fact be just what the world needs.

    And I’m not entirely confident that I’m only using hyperbole as an example that might cause introspection but there is more than an element of my subconscious that thinks that in fact this might be ta better thing for the world.

    Cheers
    -CurtD

    Reply addressees: @MomentoAnima @rey45528 @kevstyluss @toneyjetson @dp9qkbmztp @JenniferBrett15 @ryan_ut21 @HTTP_Lovecraft


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 17:32:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750934864470179840

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750914106758930929