Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Left Weak Herd vs Right Strong Pack by John Mark Left (the weak): The strong sho

    Left Weak Herd vs Right Strong Pack

    by John Mark

    Left (the weak): The strong should invest in us (allow/enable us to consume beyond what we are able to earn in reciprocity).

    Right (the strong): That’s a bad investment. It will drag us all down.

    Left (the weak): You are evil.

    Right (the strong): No, we’re just wise. And we’re just better than you.

    (War ensues.) (The only way the Right loses the war is if they refuse to use force – rule of law etc. – to suppress the Left’s theft.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 12:20:00 UTC

  • “People cherry-pick data according to the narrative their instinct causes them t

    —“People cherry-pick data according to the narrative their instinct causes them to embrace.) It just so happens that the right-wing instinct builds civilization and the left instinct destroys it.”— John Mark

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 12:07:00 UTC

  • NO PROFESSIONAL PARASITES It’s not that complicated. We have known this fact for

    NO PROFESSIONAL PARASITES

    It’s not that complicated. We have known this fact for two thousand years: (a) no professional priests, (b) no professional politicians (c) no monopoly bureaucracy, and therefore no insulation from the market.

    Add (d) full accountability for the truthfulness of public speech by involuntary warranty of consistency, correspondence, existential possibility, rationality, reciprocity, and full accounting.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 08:34:00 UTC

  • @POTUS @realDonaldTrump The Infrastructure Anti-Trust Cabal: Google (irreciproca

    @POTUS @realDonaldTrump The Infrastructure Anti-Trust Cabal: Google (irreciprocal censorship), Facebook (irreciprocal censorship), Amazon (anti-trust), Wikipedia (irreciprocal censorship), Quora (irreciprocal censorship)
    @Google @Amazon @Facebook @wikipedia @Quora

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 01:57:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035345918139277312

  • My answer to Does the government really keep us 80 years behind in terms of tech

    My answer to Does the government really keep us 80 years behind in terms of technology? https://www.quora.com/Does-the-government-really-keep-us-80-years-behind-in-terms-of-technology/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=23219ec7

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 00:57:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035330671911350272

  • My answer to Does the government really keep us 80 years behind in terms of tech

    My answer to Does the government really keep us 80 years behind in terms of technology? https://www.quora.com/Does-the-government-really-keep-us-80-years-behind-in-terms-of-technology/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 00:56:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035330503132545024

  • No, Right Political Correctness Does Not Exist.

    Right political correctness? That’s typical deceit by Pilpul. Left political correctness (postmodern shaming) relies on falsehoods to mask unpleasant truths. Conservative shaming relies on truths to prevent involuntary transfers. Conservative morality suppresses imposition of costs (meritocracy), left pretense of morality attempts to justify involuntary transfer (theft). What could be obtained by trade (usually conformity for subsidy) is sought at a discount by shaming. In other words, it’s using Pilpul to cast the equivalency of shaming as an equivalence of actions – and that’s dishonest (actually, fraudulent). Conservative reciprocity versus classical liberal equality of opportunity, vs leftist equality of outcome, versus radical leftist harm to truth, duty, reciprocity, and markets as a means of rebellion against low social, sexual, economic, and political market value. It’s just class warfare between middle class (desirable) and underclass (undesirable) genes, with the left playing top and bottom expanding low trust against the high trust but shrinking middle.

  • No, Right Political Correctness Does Not Exist.

    Right political correctness? That’s typical deceit by Pilpul. Left political correctness (postmodern shaming) relies on falsehoods to mask unpleasant truths. Conservative shaming relies on truths to prevent involuntary transfers. Conservative morality suppresses imposition of costs (meritocracy), left pretense of morality attempts to justify involuntary transfer (theft). What could be obtained by trade (usually conformity for subsidy) is sought at a discount by shaming. In other words, it’s using Pilpul to cast the equivalency of shaming as an equivalence of actions – and that’s dishonest (actually, fraudulent). Conservative reciprocity versus classical liberal equality of opportunity, vs leftist equality of outcome, versus radical leftist harm to truth, duty, reciprocity, and markets as a means of rebellion against low social, sexual, economic, and political market value. It’s just class warfare between middle class (desirable) and underclass (undesirable) genes, with the left playing top and bottom expanding low trust against the high trust but shrinking middle.

  • Right political correctness? That’s typical deceit by Pilpul. Left political cor

    Right political correctness? That’s typical deceit by Pilpul. Left political correctness (postmodern shaming) relies on falsehoods to mask unpleasant truths.

    Conservative shaming relies… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=288447341752163&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-30 01:20:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034974112442208256

  • Right political correctness? That’s typical deceit by Pilpul. Left political cor

    Right political correctness? That’s typical deceit by Pilpul. Left political correctness (postmodern shaming) relies on falsehoods to mask unpleasant truths.

    Conservative shaming relies on truths to prevent involuntary transfers. Conservative morality suppresses imposition of costs (meritocracy), left pretense of morality attempts to justify involuntary transfer (theft). What could be obtained by trade (usually conformity for subsidy) is sought at a discount by shaming.

    In other words, it’s using Pilpul to cast the equivalency of shaming as an equivalence of actions – and that’s dishonest (actually, fraudulent).

    Conservative reciprocity versus classical liberal equality of opportunity, vs leftist equality of outcome, versus radical leftist harm to truth, duty, reciprocity, and markets as a means of rebellion against low social, sexual, economic, and political market value.

    It’s just class warfare between middle class (desirable) and underclass (undesirable) genes, with the left playing top and bottom expanding low trust against the high trust but shrinking middle.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-29 21:20:00 UTC