Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • POLITICAL REALISM The strong start from the position of inequality, and the util

    POLITICAL REALISM

    The strong start from the position of inequality, and the utility of slavery, productive serfdom, financial serfdom, political serfdom. The market simply produces greater returns for the strong, largely in the reduction of costs of policing the slaves and serfs, since they self police in order to maintain access to consumption; and in the much higher productivity of the serfs due to the incentive to produce to control their levels of consumption. The weak start from the false premise of equality. And all deductions are false from that premise forward.

    The production of markets is in the interests of the strong. The production of relative inequality is in the intersets of the strong.

    Only a militia is free, because only a militia is equal in ownership of the market.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-14 10:11:00 UTC

  • September 14th, 2018 10:17 AM [W]e can’t reinstitute monogamy , only end subsidy

    September 14th, 2018 10:17 AM

    [W]e can’t reinstitute monogamy, only end subsidy and malincentive, and produce status, tax, and rights incentives. Monogamy will return to the majority in whose interest it is, and not for that minority in whose interest it is not. In practice this will mean that reproductively desirable will restore reproduction and those others shall not.

  • September 14th, 2018 10:11 AM POLITICAL REALISM [T]he strong start from the posi

    September 14th, 2018 10:11 AM POLITICAL REALISM [T]he strong start from the position of inequality, and the utility of slavery, productive serfdom, financial serfdom, political serfdom. The market simply produces greater returns for the strong, largely in the reduction of costs of policing the slaves and serfs, since they self police in order to maintain access to consumption; and in the much higher productivity of the serfs due to the incentive to produce to control their levels of consumption. The weak start from the false premise of equality. And all deductions are false from that premise forward. The production of markets is in the interests of the strong. The production of relative inequality is in the intersets of the strong. Only a militia is free, because only a militia is equal in ownership of the market.

  • September 14th, 2018 10:17 AM [W]e can’t reinstitute monogamy , only end subsidy

    September 14th, 2018 10:17 AM

    [W]e can’t reinstitute monogamy, only end subsidy and malincentive, and produce status, tax, and rights incentives. Monogamy will return to the majority in whose interest it is, and not for that minority in whose interest it is not. In practice this will mean that reproductively desirable will restore reproduction and those others shall not.

  • September 14th, 2018 10:11 AM POLITICAL REALISM [T]he strong start from the posi

    September 14th, 2018 10:11 AM POLITICAL REALISM [T]he strong start from the position of inequality, and the utility of slavery, productive serfdom, financial serfdom, political serfdom. The market simply produces greater returns for the strong, largely in the reduction of costs of policing the slaves and serfs, since they self police in order to maintain access to consumption; and in the much higher productivity of the serfs due to the incentive to produce to control their levels of consumption. The weak start from the false premise of equality. And all deductions are false from that premise forward. The production of markets is in the interests of the strong. The production of relative inequality is in the intersets of the strong. Only a militia is free, because only a militia is equal in ownership of the market.

  • We Allowed the Course of Nature to Be Subverted for Too Long

    —“the cognitively deficient essentially unionize to overrule the dictates of the market and natural law if the capable and productive are going to allow it. If we’re totally separating morality out of it and ignoring how cancerous and destructive it is for the world and humanity as a whole, they do actively profit more so by envy and its accompanying precepts than by honest effort. Many actually don’t possess the mental tools. To tell them to just be smarter/more productive would be like telling you to be taller. They’re legitimately limited by genetics, operating on the signals and incentives available to them to gather the most resources and political influence possible under their present circumstances. I used to think they were lazy…but based on all the evidence I can surmise that they’re fundamentally limited and scared, thrashing about like a drowning man for a life jacket. We allowed the course of nature to be subverted for too long, there shouldn’t be this many and we’re headed towards a market correction on that.”—-Joseph Smith

  • We Allowed the Course of Nature to Be Subverted for Too Long

    —“the cognitively deficient essentially unionize to overrule the dictates of the market and natural law if the capable and productive are going to allow it. If we’re totally separating morality out of it and ignoring how cancerous and destructive it is for the world and humanity as a whole, they do actively profit more so by envy and its accompanying precepts than by honest effort. Many actually don’t possess the mental tools. To tell them to just be smarter/more productive would be like telling you to be taller. They’re legitimately limited by genetics, operating on the signals and incentives available to them to gather the most resources and political influence possible under their present circumstances. I used to think they were lazy…but based on all the evidence I can surmise that they’re fundamentally limited and scared, thrashing about like a drowning man for a life jacket. We allowed the course of nature to be subverted for too long, there shouldn’t be this many and we’re headed towards a market correction on that.”—-Joseph Smith

  • The French Originated Socialism as National Socialism

    by Skye Stewart [T]he french originated socialism as national socialism. Both Marx’s international communism and international socialism are, in a sense ‘national socialism’ made international. Many on the alt-right and many conservatives who want to venerate their people and provide for them, all loathe to spread the benefits too far. But it’s the same sentiments involved. 1) Conservatives ‘narrow the circle’ to nationalism. 2) Lefties just ‘expand the circle’. 3) Vegans and Jainists push the circle further to include all sentient life. In that sense the difference is only in ‘who pays and how much?’.

  • The Middle Class Didn’t Care

    —“The middle class didn’t care when it was the underclass being culled. But our elites have conspired with a hostile outgroup to profit in the destruction of the middle also. Individualism in markets, but collectivism in government to impose the ban on free riding, fraud, and moral hazard to restore the relative profitability of the benevolent elite again compared to the industries of genocidal traitors.”—Joseph Smith

  • The Middle Class Didn’t Care

    —“The middle class didn’t care when it was the underclass being culled. But our elites have conspired with a hostile outgroup to profit in the destruction of the middle also. Individualism in markets, but collectivism in government to impose the ban on free riding, fraud, and moral hazard to restore the relative profitability of the benevolent elite again compared to the industries of genocidal traitors.”—Joseph Smith