“Democracy (majoritarian monopoly) is little more than the search for power by means external to the market.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 16:27:00 UTC
“Democracy (majoritarian monopoly) is little more than the search for power by means external to the market.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 16:27:00 UTC
The Tzar Bomba was 26×6 feet, meaning it fits in a container or in the back of a regular truck. One each in LA and NY Harbors would pretty much wipe out the entire united states for all intents and purposes. It would not be difficult for this attack to take place.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 16:24:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050421913447747588
The Tzar Bomba was 26×6 feet, meaning it fits in a container or in the back of a regular truck. One each in LA and NY Harbors would pretty much wipe out the entire united states for all intents and purposes. It would not be difficult for this attack to take place. That bomb, the biggest one to date, did not include an accelerator, which would have doubled it to 100m. It would break windows in Oregon. Burn much of california to the border, and restore the desert within 60m of the blast.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 12:24:00 UTC
YES IT’S A PLAN. NOT A CONSPIRACY
My octogenarian mother on education: “Kids don’t understand money. They don’t teach them about money. Because they want them to be sheep led to debt slaughter. The financial sector and the government sector are the only ones who benefit.”
Actually, it’s because the socialist left wants to replace rule of law, markets, meritocracy, and middle class control of the country, through overextension, exhaustion, and collapse.
Really. There are, at any time, a handful of strategists like me in each political wing. We solve, expound, and conspire. The rest seek to benefit from opportunities to make use of those ideas.
The (((Socialist))) plan to destroy the west was by design. The leftists are just seizing the opportunities identified in the plan, to advance their Herd instincts.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 11:00:00 UTC
THE MANUFACTURE OF IGNORANCE: PROGRESSIVISM BY DESIGN
Given that you can teach basic contract law, and basic economics, micro, and macro, and basic cash accounting to a 12 year old, the question is, WHY DON’T WE?
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 23:30:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050166814779629568
THE MANUFACTURE OF IGNORANCE: PROGRESSIVISM BY DESIGN
Given that you can teach basic contract law, and basic economics, micro, and macro, and basic cash accounting to a 12 year old, with no more complicated analogy than a balance scale, the question is, WHY DON’T WE?
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 19:30:00 UTC
October 10th, 2018 9:02 AM
Universalism. Universalism. Monopoly. Monopoly. Communist monopoly, libertarian monopoly, neocon monopoly = abrahamic monopoly.
THE HERD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS A HERD.
October 10th, 2018 7:30 PM THE MANUFACTURE OF IGNORANCE: PROGRESSIVISM BY DESIGN
[G]iven that you can teach basic contract law, and basic economics, micro, and macro, and basic cash accounting to a 12 year old, with no more complicated analogy than a balance scale, the question is, WHY DON’T WE?
October 10th, 2018 12:28 PM [I]’m not anti-anyone (genetically). If we all practice nationalism then we do not prey upon one another by exporting costs of domestication upon one another, and then can ameliorate our differences through trade, trade policy, and international (natural) law, while producing those commons most suitable to our peoples. I am however against violations of natural law both in display, word, and deed, including those traditions we all rely upon, the group strategies in those traditions, and the means of argument used in perpetuating those strategies. So do I think the people whose strategies are HERD strategies, (Semitic Monotheists, Women, and Gypsies) going to stop following their instincts and traditions? Um no I don’t. Do I think we can fight with our very lives to restore natural law so that we ameliorate those differences through separatism, nations, trade, and law? Yes I do. And I am right, and it is impossible to make a moral argument counter to it, without violating the very law that prevents us from conquering, enserving, enslaving, or worse. So the choice is simple – we either separate and cooperate or we remain artificially unified for the purposes of conquest by the herd, and fight out a bloody civil war. Carry your own genetic water.
October 10th, 2018 11:54 AM THE CHOICES ARE LIMITED I mean, by and large, you get to choose one or the other. Either your upper (professional class) will flee, your middle class will flee or your underclass will flee (third world), or you will practice eugenics, and manage empirically (middle class), and everyone will stay. This is the evidence.