Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46089495_10156776407482264_761308204

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46089495_10156776407482264_7613082046172233728_n_10156776407477264.jpg Kevin WuThe most useful infographic on the alt-right vs. progressive leftNov 13, 2018, 8:06 PMJon JonathanAlso note the greated number of methylated (imprinted) genes in tournament species vs pair bonding speciesNov 13, 2018, 8:08 PMRoss LampersSize of brain: larger in childhood vs smaller as adult

    … Can someone expand on that?Nov 13, 2018, 8:12 PMJon JonathanShould be generally larger on the left and generally smaller on the right.

    The basic concept is if youre an alpha male and you only have a limited opportunity to do as much mating as possible during your tenure you want your offspring to have genes to encourage them to grow as fast as possible even at the expense of the mother’s future reproductive health. The mother on the other hand would prefer to retain her future reproductive health so females will develop genes that are only expressed when inherited by the mother to reduce fetal growth to compensate for the growth acceleration genes the males developed.

    Pair bonding species dont have as much of this going on because when the male is going to continue mating with the same female maintaining her health is in his best interest.Nov 13, 2018, 8:27 PMJennifer DeanThere are loads more autists on the left than the right though.Nov 13, 2018, 8:28 PMNick’s ReasonIt’s not an all-encompassing theory (a complete science) of human development and gene expression. There are many more confounding variables at play. However, it does serve as a general description of some of the extreme differences we see in Sexual Dimorphism.Nov 13, 2018, 8:34 PMJon JonathanI dont think its showing what you think you think its showing

    http://www.biology-pages.info/I/Imprinting.htmlNov 13, 2018, 8:39 PMNick’s ReasonI don’t know how what you have just linked me disputes my comment.Nov 13, 2018, 8:41 PMVincent HebertIf bias met science and muddied its cherry with hand selected data – this graph would be their unwanted summary child.Nov 13, 2018, 9:48 PMJennifer Deanhttps://openpsychometrics.org/tests/EQSQ.phpNov 13, 2018, 10:34 PMDavid ParkerJennifer Dean lol. You mean psychos?Nov 13, 2018, 11:03 PMJennifer DeanI mean just go talk to autistic people and most of them are leftists.Nov 13, 2018, 11:04 PMDavid ParkerJennifer Dean ok. Gonna go hit up the local autism club and I’ll get back to you lmaoNov 13, 2018, 11:05 PMJennifer DeanI spent a few years on Wrong Planet until I just couldn’t stand the leftism anymore. It was suffocating.Nov 13, 2018, 11:05 PMDavid ParkerHere’s the thing. Most high functioning autists don’t talk about their political persuasion in person.

    Are you talking about a typical or a stereotypical autist. There’s some difference.Nov 13, 2018, 11:10 PMJennifer DeanAutists are found all over the internet so it’s not like you have to chat them up in person. Autistic people who are on disability, working through vocational rehab or living in group homes are more likely to be leftist, because they fear losing care/benefits. Also autistic people, more than the average population, tend to be homosexual, bisexual, trans, etc.Nov 13, 2018, 11:20 PMDavid Parker…… those are not high functioning autists.

    You found a bunch of severely mentally ill people who were “diagnosed” with autism for various reasons.Nov 13, 2018, 11:32 PMJennifer DeanBear in mind the only autists who can really “afford” to be right wing are those who are reasonably self-sufficient and/or married, or otherwise protected by strong family ties. Otherwise the left serves their interests much more so than the right. Considering r vs. k reproductive strategies, the majority of autists don’t fit into either category. Many are asexual. And it is easier for someone who is not socially well connected to hide anonymously in a herd, than to run with a pack.Nov 13, 2018, 11:37 PMJennifer Dean”High functioning” as a clinical term simply means IQ over 70. It says nothing about the actual ability of an autist to function in society.Nov 13, 2018, 11:40 PMDavid ParkerJennifer Dean oh. So you just don’t know what you’re talking about then.Nov 13, 2018, 11:50 PMJennifer DeanAd hominem.Nov 13, 2018, 11:55 PMDavid ParkerJennifer Dean it wasn’t. I decided you don’t know what you’re talking about based on the evidence given, and I’m concluding our discussion.Nov 14, 2018, 12:06 AMMartin ŠtěpánSo alt-right has less inner speech? Who are the NPCs again?Nov 14, 2018, 5:56 AMJames SantagataI have personally “imprinted” a few brains myself. Very cathartic.Nov 14, 2018, 7:43 AMAndrea RoyallShush….. confessions! 😉Nov 14, 2018, 8:02 AMSolomon VolodymyrHello is this the policeNov 15, 2018, 5:21 AMAndrea Royalloh James is kidding. Anyone who’s ever used a hammer for imprinting brains uses the claw side..Nov 15, 2018, 5:26 AMJames SantagataPlus, I’m right handed.Nov 15, 2018, 5:27 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 20:04:00 UTC

  • No We Don’t. We Don’t Need You. We Don’t Want You – At All

    2018-11-13 T 11:39:57

    —“…you need us…”— the left

    No we don’t. We don’t need you. We don’t WANT YOU – AT ALL. You are disgusting. Really. You ruin everything. Our neighborhoods, our schools, our city streets, our workplaces, our public buildings and parks, our history, our academy, our governments, our religion, our festivals, are armies, or civic order, even our gene pool… .. I mean…. you’re just bad, disgusting, primitive people. We don’t want you. You are like locusts that consume everything beautiful. You are a plague against our people, our civilization, and the efforts of our ancestors. So no. We don’t need you. You have no value. You are more than a cost, you are a disease. Civilizations prosper most by getting rid of the underclass through harsh prosecution, harsher winter starvation, and the harshest possible taxation. And the fewer of you the better for us and for the planet, and for the future of mankind. You are a living breathing waste of the planet’s mankind’s and the universe’s potential.

  • No We Don’t. We Don’t Need You. We Don’t Want You – At All

    2018-11-13 T 11:39:57

    —“…you need us…”— the left

    No we don’t. We don’t need you. We don’t WANT YOU – AT ALL. You are disgusting. Really. You ruin everything. Our neighborhoods, our schools, our city streets, our workplaces, our public buildings and parks, our history, our academy, our governments, our religion, our festivals, are armies, or civic order, even our gene pool… .. I mean…. you’re just bad, disgusting, primitive people. We don’t want you. You are like locusts that consume everything beautiful. You are a plague against our people, our civilization, and the efforts of our ancestors. So no. We don’t need you. You have no value. You are more than a cost, you are a disease. Civilizations prosper most by getting rid of the underclass through harsh prosecution, harsher winter starvation, and the harshest possible taxation. And the fewer of you the better for us and for the planet, and for the future of mankind. You are a living breathing waste of the planet’s mankind’s and the universe’s potential.

  • THE MEANING OF NEO-MARXISM I think you’re looking at the differences between lea

    THE MEANING OF NEO-MARXISM

    I think you’re looking at the differences between leaves rather than the forest. In the end, the criticism is marxism is pseudoscience, postmodernism is sophism, and feminism simply false, and that these three movements, by making false statements and impossible promises are leading people into sadness and our civilization in decline.

    I study the abrahamic > marxist > Postmodern technique of argument (false promises, pilpul (justificationary sophism) and critique (reputation destruction) as the institutionalization of the female anti social personality expression as a persuasive technique. All these are guments use the same technique. They are all false. And they all cause the damage Peterson Claims.

    So the none of the details matter – they are but different decorations on the underlying lie.

    The term Neo Marxism refers to the transition of the means of UNDERMINING (reputation destruction) from the Marxist economic to the postmodern cultural complaint. Egro, yes Abrahamists > Marxists > Postmodernists > Feminist.

    Same technique, same goal, while changing only the critique.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:53:00 UTC

  • GLOBALISM(COMMUNISM) VS NATIONALISM(FASCISM) 1) MARX, COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, GLOB

    GLOBALISM(COMMUNISM) VS NATIONALISM(FASCISM)

    1) MARX, COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, GLOBALISM – We don’t need to debunk marx, that’s been done for decades. Marx created a fairy story.

    (a) Man was not oppressed, but incrementally domesticated by his betters, like every other domesticated animal. Societies advanced best and fastest who most culled the underclasses (European Bipartite Manorialism, and East Asian Rice Farming) and culling the underclass is the cheapest, fastest, most secure means of improving the standard of life of the citizenry.

    (b) labor has little or no value since it is the organization of production that creates the value, and labor is a fungible low value cost easily and continuously replaced by machines, computers, and now artificial intelligences.

    (c) the underclass cannot organize production, or govern, or lead because they lack the ABILITIES to do so (dunning kruger, distribution of intelligence).

    (d) all non-market social orders maximize rent seeking at the expense of the laboring, working, middle, and professional classes, while all market orders suppress rent seeking through competition.

    (e) the problem we face is immigration of the underclasses, downward redistribution of reproduction to the lower and underclasses, subsidies that encourage this process, and the continuous destruction of the middle class majority produced by centuries of manorialism (hanging, disease, and wars), culling those underclasses,

    (f) the political problem we face is financialization of the economy in addition to bureaucratic rents, (both of which are fixable by market means.

    (g) Marx-Boas-Freud-Cantor-Adorno(et al) proposed an underclass monopoly, while Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, a Middle Class, while Foucault, Derrida, Rorty a Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle, while Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin a Feminist, and Strauss-Neocons a Political/Military upper class monopoly. The left proposes MONOPOLIES (a herd) and the right proposes MARKETS (packs).

    —VERSUS—

    2) FASCISM, NAZIISM, NATIONALISM – Naziism like all Fascism was providing an alternative to (Bolshevik) World Communism. It was the most successful implementation of the original French Proposition. Peterson knows this just as any scholar knows this.

    We are still fighting this warfare of Nationalism (A Market of Polities) and Globalism ( Monopoly Polity). and we have just complete a century of that test.

    (a) Each attempt by the globalists has failed, and (b) each attempt by the nationalists has eventually succeeded. We are currently in the last phase, under which we will restore nationalism worldwide and return to state-capitalism (fasicsm) most of which will be ethnocentric, and some which will not – and will devolve in to indian, muslim, african, and south american poverty.

    Rousseau (Feminine Subjective) + Schopenhauer, Hegel et al (Conflationists) + Kant (Masculine Analytic)

    -vs-

    Marx, Cantor, Freud, Adorno (Working and Underclasses) – FAILED

    -vs-

    Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, (Middle Classes) – FAILED

    -vs-

    Foucault, Derrida, Rorty (Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle) – FAILING RIGHT NOW

    -vs-

    Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin (Feminists) – FAILING RIGHT NOW

    -vs-

    Strauss-Neocons (Political/Military-Masculine – Upper) FAILED

    The gradual attack on Aristocratic Civilization from the bottom up.

    -The Counter-Revolution Against Anglo Legal-Empiricism, and German Rational-Science-

    Utopian Promise upon Achieving Monopoly Consensus + Straw Man + Pilpul and Critique

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:27:00 UTC

  • “Before all else, be armed.”–Machiavelli

    —“Before all else, be armed.”–Machiavelli

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:25:00 UTC

  • THEY CAN”T UNDERSTAND US – WE ARE ANTIFRAGILE by John Mark “They have no idea wh

    THEY CAN”T UNDERSTAND US – WE ARE ANTIFRAGILE

    by John Mark

    “They have no idea what is coming”

    —RE: “I thrive on attacks”– Curt

    This is an area where, from what I can tell, the Left truly does not understand the Right, especially the hard Right.

    We are antifragile. Because we have agency. A very large percentage (probably a majority) of our group are men of agency. If we did not have it, most of us would not be part of the hard right, because NPCs are incapable of paying the price one must pay – dedication to seeking the truth regardless of cost.

    Because leftists and NPCs lack agency, they have difficulty grasping what they are dealing with when they encounter a man of agency in the political realm. Most leftists alive today have never dealt with a political opponent like Trump in their lifetimes. (Reagan was a light version, but America was very different then.) The Left has no idea how to handle him except to double down on the same tactics, which merely energize him.

    My theory is, *they underestimate us* largely because *they cannot imagine being like us*. If *they* were subjected to the shaming they hurl at us, *they* would cower and conform. They cheer every time they censor one of us successfully, not realizing they are sowing the seeds of their own destruction. Because they are feeding the energy of the antifragile beast: men of agency of the West.

    Imagine being an NPC. You’ve never questioned the “popular accepted” narrative in your life. How could you have any idea what you’re dealing with when you’re dealing with Men of Agency of the West?

    They have no idea what’s coming. Just like they had no idea Trump would win, and could not fathom it, they cannot fathom the forces they have awakened by attacking us, our civilization, our honor, and our forefathers’ honor.

    WE LOVE THE FIGHT.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 15:53:00 UTC

  • “…you need us…”— the left No we don’t. We don’t need you. We don’t WANT YO

    —“…you need us…”— the left

    No we don’t. We don’t need you. We don’t WANT YOU – AT ALL. You are disgusting. Really. You ruin everything. Our neighborhoods, our schools, our city streets, our workplaces, our public buildings and parks, our history, our academy, our governments, our religion, our festivals, are armies, or civic order, even our gene pool… .. I mean…. you’re just bad, disgusting, primitive people. We don’t want you. You are like locusts that consume everything beautiful. You are a plague against our people, our civilization, and the efforts of our ancestors. So no. We don’t need you. You have no value. You are more than a cost, you are a disease. Civilizations prosper most by getting rid of the underclass through harsh prosecution, harsher winter starvation, and the harshest possible taxation. And the fewer of you the better for us and for the planet, and for the future of mankind. You are a living breathing waste of the planet’s mankind’s and the universe’s potential.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 11:39:00 UTC

  • “The oppression of libertarians is just the free market in action. Violence is a

    —“The oppression of libertarians is just the free market in action. Violence is a service. Their tax dollars are a good.”—John Edward

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 19:21:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062062895951986693

  • THE COMING CIVIL WAR WILL NOT BE OVER RACE It is, and will be war over SPECIATIO

    THE COMING CIVIL WAR WILL NOT BE OVER RACE

    It is, and will be war over SPECIATION. Whether we will regress into the equalitarian herd, or evolve into hierarchical packs. We are wealthy enough to speciate. Each side wants to produce commons that suit its method of speciation: herd(r), or pack(k). Since this question is not possible to resolve by compromise, our only choice is separation. This means that some significant portion of the ingroup will exit. And this is politically, economically, strategically, and evolutionarily desirable. Unfortunately the herd always fears the pack, and will resist it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 15:46:00 UTC