—“You do an irreplaceable service to our people, and that is, and should be, loved. We must win.”– A Friend.
We must, we will, and it is our love of each other and our people that will force us to.
From many, we are one.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-24 11:18:00 UTC
ALL THAT MATTERS IS WINNING
by John Mark
All that matters is winning.
And the Right cannot win with JBP’s strategy (preach about the evils of communism/leftism and the principles of individualism, naively preaching against identity politics when everyone knows nonwhites will never give it up, while *countersignaling and demonizing* the ONLY group on the Right that knows how to WIN.)
To WIN, the Right must achieve a white supermajority nation(s) (either all of the US or parts of it), and then institute an improved, leftism-proof form of gov’t (propertarianism).
The Winning Right’s beef with JBP is that he is a LOSER. He cannot lead us to victory.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-24 10:57:00 UTC
FASCISM WON. I’ve been on this rant for a year now. And it takes a while to sink in. But intolerance won. It won the 20th century. Because everyone ELSE sees what it has done to the west.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 19:18:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1066048349281968130
Reply addressees: @nntaleb
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1065652328974430208
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1065652328974430208
—“Civic Nationalism is when you care more about a product being made in China than you care about your neighbor being made in Somalia.”—@TOOAJoyce
via Steve Pender
(ouch)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 16:38:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1065645707531558915
—“You (we) must meet violence for violence and threat for threat. Else you (we) will be overrun by tyrants claiming to be tolerant.”— Stephen Klostermeier
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 16:36:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1065645217423024130
—“You (we) must meet violence for violence and threat for threat. Else you (we) will be overrun by tyrants claiming to be tolerant.”— Stephen Klostermeier
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 11:36:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46501222_10156795733877264_5477799498317037568_n_10156795733872264.jpg I’m actually a fairly nice guy. But you know, when the left retreats into socialism and shaming, the libertarian and right must retreat into fascism and threat. I restore that honesty to the discourse. So that’s what you’re seeing. Me restoring war (violence) to the discourse. It’s very hard to be a moral person and disagree with ‘markets in everything’.Stephen ThomasYou must meet violence for violence and threat for threat. Else you will be overrun by tyrants claiming to be tolerant.Nov 22, 2018, 10:14 AMNoah J RevoyMy impression is that you are primarily motivated by love with strong secondary tones of K-selected, masculine disgust for lies.Nov 22, 2018, 10:24 AMAndrew MaughanIts physics really. An object in motion will remain in motion until/unless acted upon by an EQUAL or GREATER opposing force. I find that the same goes for human emotion and behavior. The right of today seems to believe that appeasement and capitulation will somehow stave the onslaught of radical socialism which frankly goes against basic reason.Nov 22, 2018, 10:28 AMJennifer DeanWhen the left advances with replacement and genocide, we must advance with an equal threat.Nov 22, 2018, 11:01 AMSkye StewartI get the same thing all the time. People always assume the worst about us. “Conservative” bastards 🧐Nov 22, 2018, 11:19 AMCurt Doolittlepretty much, yep.Nov 22, 2018, 11:33 AMCurt Doolittle(because of childhood I also have a purely subconscious and inescapable feeling I need to protect people. So thats’ the tird leg of the cognitive stool.)Nov 22, 2018, 11:34 AMCurt DoolittleYep.Nov 22, 2018, 11:34 AMSolomon VolodymyrI get this. I’m not one of these skinhead twats who loves fighting and gets off fantasizing about genocide, far from it – by personality type, I should be a leftist and in fact was once upon a time – but I am drawn to your sort of quasi fascism. Well call me a nationalist and a pragmatist; I altogether loathe ideology.Nov 22, 2018, 12:09 PMSolomon VolodymyrSkye Stewart you’re pretty left on a few topics but you’re still on our level. There can and in fact must be dialogue between left and right but it has to be within a logical framework between sensible, non-lying people – the kind of paradigm we currently sorely lack in mainstream politics.Nov 22, 2018, 12:13 PMSkye StewartSolomon Volodymyr to which leftish propensities do you refer? Out of interest ☝🏼Nov 22, 2018, 12:20 PMSolomon VolodymyrWell generally you seem to care about stuff that alt-righters don’t. You have I’d say a more balanced view, just from what you shareNov 22, 2018, 12:22 PMAndrea RoyallPeace was never an optionNov 22, 2018, 12:56 PMMartin ŠtěpánI too was a leftist. But truth is the truth.Nov 22, 2018, 2:54 PMMartin ŠtěpánJust made me think. Contrary to what Curt says, an individual can actually speak no only honestly but also truthfully, provided he only speaks in tautologies. It’s probably not a very useful insight…Nov 22, 2018, 2:57 PMMartin ŠtěpánDepends. We all have some left-wing ideas to someone who understands right-wing as libertarianism. Like welfare for the childless.Nov 22, 2018, 3:22 PMSkye StewartMartin Štěpán https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z31FQ1_jjlQNov 22, 2018, 3:29 PMCurt DoolittleThat’s not contrary to what I say. On the other hand, speaking exclusively in tautologies is hard to imagine, although different descriptions of the same operations are technically tautologies.Nov 22, 2018, 3:38 PMMartin ŠtěpánIt is what it is.Nov 22, 2018, 3:42 PMJames SantagataNoah J Revoy that’s a great insight but I think most of us, hate the fact that these lies are so bald-faced, and so blatant as to be insulting. And then when we expose the liars as lairs, their arrogance and supremacist chutzpah is so great, so beyond that pale, that it boils the blood.Nov 22, 2018, 5:46 PMNoah J RevoyJames Santagata Don’t take our intolerance for lies for granted. So many people prefer lies, no matter how offensive, rather than a truth that requires them to take an unpleasant action.
We who love truth and hate lies of all sorts. We who would rather suffer the pain of truth than live comfortably in lies. We are the minority and we will remain so for generations to come. We are going to have to drag the masses out of the darkness of their decadent lies by force.Nov 22, 2018, 5:51 PMJames SantagataNoah J Revoy e.g, “can’ t we all just get along”, “be nice”, “let it go”, etc.Nov 22, 2018, 6:35 PMCurt DoolittleWhy can’t we just escalate instead? lolzNov 22, 2018, 7:01 PMJames SantagataCurt Doolittle We should. We should welcome conflict.Nov 22, 2018, 7:17 PMNicola WrightI have an acquaintance who identifies as an actual communist. Even he is labelled a ‘racist nazi’ because he’s outspoken against SJW rhetoric. The racist nazi label used as silencing tactic is quickly losing it’s power.Nov 23, 2018, 2:47 AMSkye StewartArguably the most famous communist/philosopher in the world is Slavoj Žižek. He deconstructs postmodern and SJW beliefs and tendencies better than many anti-communist Right wingers.Nov 23, 2018, 10:46 AMI’m actually a fairly nice guy. But you know, when the left retreats into socialism and shaming, the libertarian and right must retreat into fascism and threat. I restore that honesty to the discourse. So that’s what you’re seeing. Me restoring war (violence) to the discourse. It’s very hard to be a moral person and disagree with ‘markets in everything’.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 10:07:00 UTC
In every great era of transformation men must be reminded that while we pursue ideals together to improve current conditions, that we must not, by doing so, lose our comprehension of the real. And by the real, i mean, that cooperation is merely one of the means of conflict, and that either we are pushing people out of the bottom of our group, or pushing other groups out of the bottom of all groups, but that we are always and everywhere in competition as the optimum evolutionary means of conflict. Hence why we have the generational need for warriors to write reminders of how to fight, lest we fall under the illusion that no fight exists, or that others will not resort to non-cooperationg, and warfare by all means possible at all times.
THere are many dead gods, for all the peoples who are dead.
(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-21 10:31:00 UTC
Are you offensively ignorant? CHINA: Racism, Nationalism, Supremacy, Military Expansionism, Single Man Rule, Rubber Stamp Bureaucracy, State Capitalism, Unlimited Credit Expansion, Required Employment, Digital Monitoring of Public Reputation, Zero Tolerance, Reeducation Camps.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-20 19:15:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1064960325697642499
Reply addressees: @Tucsonred
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1064889812824416257
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1064889812824416257
“CHINA HAS SUCCEEDED WITH NATIONAL SOCIALISM”
—“Are you out of your f-cking mind?”—Jeffrey B (twittiot)
Are you offensively ignorant? CHINA: Racism, Nationalism, Supremacy, Military Expansionism, Single Man Rule, Rubber Stamp Bureaucracy, State Capitalism, Unlimited Credit Expansion, Required Employment, Digital Monitoring of Public Reputation, Zero Tolerance, Reeducation Camps.
I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job. Someone has to compensate for the kind of moron that even questions the obvious.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-20 14:18:00 UTC