Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Scott I was tangentially involved in a very (very) minor capacity and we couldn’

    Scott
    I was tangentially involved in a very (very) minor capacity and we couldn’t get help from Intel or State until just as Maydan started to pick up steam. Then the system shifted into gear. But everyone I knew considered everything a humanitarian mission to help the Ukrainian people get out from a corrupt government that was bought and paid for by Russia to make it easier for the capture of the country – against the will of the people.
    Some NGOs whose names I won’t mention have been working in UA to help for decades. (Danes in particular). We weren’t alone. All those poor people wanted was to look easily east to poland and join the prosperity that they felt they could have and would fight for.
    Ukrainians would have been happy if RU asked to ‘buy’ the eastern provinces in exchange for gas discounts – because they were the source of so much organized crime. But when RU invaded that turned the entire population at least, west of those provinces, into nationalists on a scale I haven’t seen in my lifetime.
    It wasn’t hard to fill the ranks of Praavy Sektor or Azov. The biggest problem was equipping them. And most of it that I saw was via mail order from europe and the states. 😉 Night vision goggles were a status symbol. The rifles and ammunition where local and cheap.

    Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays

    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 19:20:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762195995721338880

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762107758575558765

  • NIKKI: We hired Trump as a wrecking ball against the state that’s been captured

    NIKKI: We hired Trump as a wrecking ball against the state that’s been captured by ideological left, and an incompetent boomer-era republican party that’s failed to resist that leftism for generations now.
    He isn’t chaos. Hes destroying the chaos to restore order.

    Please stop…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 19:10:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762193436440924517

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762159141227802639

  • “You’re attributing causality only to the one acted upon (women) and completely

    –“You’re attributing causality only to the one acted upon (women) and completely ignoring the one acting (political jews).”– MS

    I think I just have a different objective from yours:

    (a) I want to produce a law that prohibits another in the Female -> Feminine-> Jewish -> Abrahamic -> Marxist sequence of crimes against mankind by seduction of humans into a hazard even worse than suicidal drug use.

    (b) You, on the other hand, want to blame and punish people – where I just want to fix the problem for eternity.

    I understand your emotional condition because I went through it myself – only to understand it wasn’t helping me get the work done.

    I care about cause, responsibility, restoration, and prevention. I care less about blame, punishment, and restitution.

    It doesn’t mean there isn’t a place for both the correction and the punishment. it’s just not useful for me to talk about the punishment.

    -CD

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS

    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 18:57:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762190105400291328

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762188006713119077

  • Political systems that require consent from large numbers tend to fail at politi

    Political systems that require consent from large numbers tend to fail at political choice with regularity – especially as a government ages. (most governments outside of the usa and the uk are ‘new’ by comparison.) So read James Burnham to understand that, and Hoppe to understand why modern governments without monarchies tend to fail (deterministically will fail).
    Natural law isn’t an opinion it’s the science.
    A constitution of natural law isn’t a philosophy it’s a science.
    A government under natural law is scientific.
    Meaning that all political questions are decidable one way or another (and the left is just criminal).
    The changes over the past 200+ years have exposed holes in our constitutions both written (usa, aus) and unwritten (uk). But those holes are small in number and can easily be plugged and constitution, law, and policy corrected. Even though plugging that small number of holes will have vast consequences given how many ‘exploits’ were possible because of those few holes.
    If you have nearly any system of choice (government) under natural law (sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, markets) a judiciary limited to the law, and a ‘judge of last resort’ that is above the law in the restoration of the law, a populace with an IQ of at least 100, and an armed populace, then you have ‘perfect government’. Or at least, as perfect as can be imagined.
    Now, there are other requirements such as radical reform of the financial system and the govt role in strategic industry development (which used to happen via our military), as well as restoring competition to education, etc. My primary contribution in the end is just ‘truth in everything’ which results in ‘the science’ in everything.
    Once that’s the case, then the only thing we can do is trade. We cant use the government to steal from one another.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @VeritateIn

    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 18:16:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762179802239242240

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762169043132502108

  • Monarch is just military discipline, judicial discipline, and religious discipli

    Monarch is just military discipline, judicial discipline, and religious discipline practiced to the extreme. The british do it best because they are still the most able. But the european monarchies are not reproducing in sufficient numbers to serve the needs of europe. And so we need a ‘correction’ as soon as possible. I don’t have any complaints about the Saudis (or any other existing monarchy) really. But other civilizations don’t depend on rule of law by the natural law and the high trust it produces – and we do.

    Reply addressees: @ouroborosKXM

    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 18:03:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762176609728053248

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762175665103618378

  • They failed because the left succeeded enough to cause it to fail, because our a

    They failed because the left succeeded enough to cause it to fail, because our ancestors, the founders, didn’t and couldn’t expect to defend us from the introduction of women and hostile jewish (leftist) elites that would manipulate them.

    There is no alternative to a constitution of natural law that is sufficiently complete (my work), and and an armed populace, and preferably a monarchy that will disband a government rather than have those people take up arms.

    Reply addressees: @ReddTav

    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 17:52:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762173907597922304

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762172504632684747

  • Government needs a few tweaks, which in retrospect should have been obvious – I’

    Government needs a few tweaks, which in retrospect should have been obvious – I’ve done the work and it’s rock solid science. Monarchies don’t need to govern any more than do judges. But in the end, given the universality of the failure of political systems due to incentives (read Burnham and Hoppe) we do require a judge of last resort that can if necessary replace a government failing the people. If we had a king right now we could sue as the founders did. But without a king we have only civil war. The english monarchy in the 20th has the correct rights and obligations under rule of law – they are above the law in restoration of the law. The problem is that they are afraid to use that power in the current postwar climate. In other words, without a monarchy you have no intergenerational defense of the people from what the left has done to us. And without a means by which the people can defend the monarchy they cannot exercise the power to defend us from the government.

    Reply addressees: @TomKawczynski

    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 17:49:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762173123535781888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762171894663360764

  • ( Thoughts – Strategic ) I’ve been waiting for an opportunity to emerge, assumin

    ( Thoughts – Strategic )
    I’ve been waiting for an opportunity to emerge, assuming it only had a small chance of emerging, and it appears that it has. “Secession into greater unification.” Like many things it’s strategically optimum, but will the population understand it?
    We can convert the five eyes into a greater number, by secession, disempower the costal hostiles and effectively restore the anglosphere (the british empire) into a federation with a monarchy serving as a judge of last resort.
    Like many propositions I put forward that seem unlikely at first, I think that over a few years it could develop into a rational choice. And in the end it might even save germany from it’s almost certain dissolution.
    The USA cannot govern the world, or even the eurosphere or even that anglosphere as it is constructed with such concentration of power and such capture by the destructive credentialists of the left. I can explain how this would be brought about and why it would be effective in bringing ‘DC-NY-LA’ to heel.
    I have a work day planned today, and do not need distractions from trying to get the “Pamphlet” (summary) done and published, but I expect to spend time producing that argument and possibly producing a video, in the near future.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 16:56:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762159589305237504

  • Bari Weiss: Why DEI Must End For Good via @YouTube

    Bari Weiss: Why DEI Must End For Good https://youtu.be/ZhvfRxJ3ul0?si=LqZlb1prDtYz5iyd via @YouTube

    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 16:34:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762154060109520935

  • RT @state_secession: “Trump expressed concerns about the unity of the country, s

    RT @state_secession: “Trump expressed concerns about the unity of the country, stating that it is on the verge of fragmentation. He warned…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-26 15:57:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1762144827620151780