—“There is more equality of peace with arms than white flags.”—Anne Summers
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 15:09:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1095701548397744128
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
“I knew that we must defend societal institutions (commons) but I was unable to
—“I knew that we must defend societal institutions (commons) but I was unable to advocate it effectively in a Hoppean frame.”—Eric Burkett
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 13:08:00 UTC
-
“As of 2014, the VA estimates there were 22 million military veterans in the U.S
—“As of 2014, the VA estimates there were 22 million military veterans in the U.S. population. If you add their figures on veterans to the active personnel numbers mentioned above, 7.3 percent of all living Americans have served in the military at some point in their lives.”—
That’s approximately 25M people, of whom the very vast majority are white males (and are pissed).
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 12:25:00 UTC
-
WHAT WILL THE REST OF THE WORLD DO? —“Hmmmmm. So when the dust settles, do you
WHAT WILL THE REST OF THE WORLD DO?
—“Hmmmmm. So when the dust settles, do you see any outliers doing anything you might not have thought of already?”—Monica Marquez
The world will seek historical equilibrium in their spheres of influence, and the military will have to return to the continent rather than protecting europe, thereby forcing europe and russia and eastern europe into their historical alliance (christendom).
The outlier is the UK, and I do not know how but it would be preferable to restore the british empire as the alliance of english speaking (and british) peoples.
Incentives are relatively obvious at this point. We are the pin that holds the world together. But nuclear arms are what they are.
So I suspect that all it will do is accelerate what everyone in every think tank in the world suggests:
Return to normal across the world.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 12:19:00 UTC
-
When we take the states, the aussies will take theirs. When we take the center,
When we take the states, the aussies will take theirs. When we take the center, and canada falls. All that is left is for spain, italy, eastern europe, russia, and what is left of men in britain if there are any, and what is left of men in germany if there are any, and we will have our national socialism in all our nations, and our extermination under the banner of abrahamism in both ancient supernatural and modern pseudoscientific forms will end forever. We did spain, we did the balkans, and we can do the world.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 12:01:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52146446_10156984161447264_529436613
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52146446_10156984161447264_5294366130914197504_o_10156984161442264.jpg THOSE WHO GOVERN
The Theologitariat claim you are should be governed by a moral religion.
The Politariat claim you should be governed by their judgement.
The Commentariat market that you should be governed by philosophy.
The Economitariat that you should be governed by consumption.
In practice you are governed by the Law, and all else is an attempt to subvert it.
In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their tolerance of the current condition.
We are the men who Choose.
So Choose.Brandon Hayes*forbearance ;)Feb 13, 2019, 11:37 AMCurt DoolittleI need something of this nature on forbearance.
Do you have anything?Feb 13, 2019, 11:37 AMCurt DoolittleI need a definition and an example, and esp, an example in series if possible.Feb 13, 2019, 11:40 AMBrandon HayesLuke Weinhagen is the forbearance guru.
I make the distinction between tolerance and forbearance where ever I see it because I see it as a crucial point.
I don’t tolerate bad behavior; I forbear for some of it in my presence. Not because I have to but because I appreciate nuance and timing in my tactics.
“In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their tolerance of the current condition.” < We don’t have to tolerate; Propertarianism gives license to persecute those cheating. For now we allow it as to create a more ideal transition [but it is not a must].Feb 13, 2019, 11:40 AMCurt DoolittleLuke Weinhagen ????? please?Feb 13, 2019, 11:41 AMCurt Doolittleah, so, convenience (cheating) > tolerance(discounting) > conviction(forbearance)Feb 13, 2019, 11:43 AMBrandon HayesI have some tags for you; one moment. :)Feb 13, 2019, 11:44 AMJWarren PrescottIn my heart, I just want to be left alone.Feb 13, 2019, 11:46 AMCurt Doolittlewe are never left alone. We must compete. Nature gave us luxuries. but none of us survive defeat by the red queen.Feb 13, 2019, 11:47 AMJWarren PrescottCurt Doolittle – and therein lies the dilemma… One of wanting to not be ruled by anyone and the other by wanting to be part of somethingFeb 13, 2019, 11:51 AMBill JohnsonFrom the Hymnal. Let’s all turn to page 27.Feb 13, 2019, 12:01 PMLuke WeinhagenCatching up…Feb 13, 2019, 1:03 PMLuke Weinhagentolerance – the capacity to endure continued subjection to something (my adds: externalizes costs, ignores limits, passive state, imposed externally, waives agency)
forbearance – patient self-control; restraint; the action of refraining from exercising a legal right, a response or enforcing the payment of a debt/cost. (my adds: carries costs, imposes limits, active state, self imposed, applies agency)
Above –
“tolerance of the current condition” is a great example of the ambiguity tolerance allows. Who is responsible for the current condition? Who imposed a cost and who is carrying that cost?
Alternative –
“In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their forbearance of your shortcomings.”
Explicit in who is costing and who is covering costs.Feb 13, 2019, 1:31 PMLuke WeinhagenThe alternative also reminds the men who fight of their responsibility for what is and to reiterate their responsibility in asserting limits upon that forbearance.Feb 13, 2019, 1:44 PMTHOSE WHO GOVERN
The Theologitariat claim you are should be governed by a moral religion.
The Politariat claim you should be governed by their judgement.
The Commentariat market that you should be governed by philosophy.
The Economitariat that you should be governed by consumption.
In practice you are governed by the Law, and all else is an attempt to subvert it.
In absolutes you are governed by men who fight and their tolerance of the current condition.
We are the men who Choose.
So Choose.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 11:34:00 UTC
-
“There is more equality of peace with arms than white flags.”—Anne Summers
—“There is more equality of peace with arms than white flags.”—Anne Summers
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 10:09:00 UTC
-
“SIEGE can be summed up as follows: – Don’t do protest marches. – Don’t think yo
—“SIEGE can be summed up as follows:
– Don’t do protest marches.
– Don’t think you can achieve anything with a political party.
– Don’t think voting will change anything that is of true importance.
– If you’re going to fight, don’t just throw rocks at cops and similar minor targets (including Antifa etc.), but plan your attacks carefully for maximum disruption of the system.”
—Caduceus Mercurius
The central problem for an insurrection capable of obtaining state capitulation, is maintaining supplies while denying the urban centers supplies. This turns out to be fairly simple.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 09:48:00 UTC
-
IT IS NOT THE LAW, BUT VIOLENCE THAT SAVES US —“Men in power are always gonna
IT IS NOT THE LAW, BUT VIOLENCE THAT SAVES US
—“Men in power are always gonna push the envelope to see what they can get away with; and those who invested in their regime are always going to cover for them – at least until it’s no longer profitable for them to do so – and perhaps after that if they have any loyalty or honour. What’s to be done in those cases? I’m curious what your solution is. It seems to me the problem is that men are corruptible, and any system can, and given enough time, will be corrupted by ignoble dishonest men. You’ll have to forgive me, but I’ve lost faith in legal systems, and higher ideals. It seems that all that matters to men is power. The only people who have seem to have any semblance of honour are military folks, which is why militarized fascistic society, where martial virtue is the civil ethic.”—Richard Heathen
– Violence
– Organized Violence
– Law as a proxy for organized violence
– Politics as a proxy for organized violence at scale
– Markets as a proxy for universal violence at scale.
– Knowledge as a proxy for universal violence at scale.
– Genetic survival by violence and proxies for violence at every scale.
If the court is restored to common law independence (tort) then the court is just a proxy for violence between those of different physical abilities, but equal rights to property.
And if the law says men denied the proxy for violence, and licenses violence where such proxy denied, then men will happily use violence rather than court or politics as proxy.
The only requirement necessary to do so is to restore the militia – most probably in a reform of the regimental system – such that they always have the power to exert violence in the personal and political scale, at personal.
IT IS NOT THE LAW THAT PROTECTS US BUT THE PERSISTENT MARKET FOR VIOLENCE SERVED ONLY BY THE MARKETS FOR PROXIES FOR VIOLENCE.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 09:35:00 UTC
-
ITS TIME —“We have a real solution now and a real plan of action, now we just
ITS TIME
—“We have a real solution now and a real plan of action, now we just need consensus, which we are reaching. For the past 20 years, talk about civil war has been just that, talk. As long as people are economically comfortable it was always just talk. But we’re rapidly approaching the point where pure environmental and economic conditions will force people into action, talk will no longer be an option.”—Dax Rayner
…
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 09:26:00 UTC