Maybe if I live long enough I can do a rewrite of fascism in propertarian prose because at that point it would be unstoppable.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 09:53:00 UTC
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
WE WILL EDUCATE YOU ON WARFARE Then you can no longer claim ignorance. You are s
WE WILL EDUCATE YOU ON WARFARE
Then you can no longer claim ignorance.
You are stuck with cowardice.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 09:23:00 UTC
-
very interesting article about 4th generation warfare and scenarios for Europe a
https://ammo.com/articles/asymmetrical-warfare-4gw-americas-domestic-viet-cong?fbclid=IwAR2Zjn2HrkIWcyansYY-dv1qTeM2E9uW66Oy4AzGuGq6m6eV8RU3aVg8s5g—“A very interesting article about 4th generation warfare and scenarios for Europe and the US. Worth a read.”—Liberty Machine News
https://ammo.com/articles/asymmetrical-warfare-4gw-americas-domestic-viet-cong
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 09:22:00 UTC
-
DOCTRINE OF FASCISM (via @[100010386694913:2048:Richard Heathen] ) “Or ‘you don’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Doctrine_of_FascismTHE DOCTRINE OF FASCISM
(via @[100010386694913:2048:Richard Heathen] )
“Or ‘you don’t know it, but you’re a fascist – and it’s a good thing” Fascism advocates the organization of the state in the interests of the nation (people, race).
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Doctrine_of_Fascism
The Essay:
http://library.flawlesslogic.com/fascism.htm
Overview
“The Doctrine of Fascism” (Italian: “La dottrina del fascismo”) is an essay attributed to Benito Mussolini. In truth, the first part of the essay, entitled “Idee Fondamentali” (Italian for “Fundamental Ideas”) was written by philosopher Giovanni Gentile, while only the second part (“Dottrina politica e sociale”) is the work of Mussolini himself.
It was first published in the Enciclopedia Italiana of 1932, as the first section of a lengthy entry on “Fascismo” (Italian for Fascism).
The entire entry on Fascism spans pages 847–884 of the Enciclopedia Italiana, and includes numerous photographs and graphic images. The Mussolini entry starts on page 847 and ends on 851 with the credit line “Benito Mussolini.” All subsequent translations of “The Doctrine of Fascism” are from this work.
A key concept of the Mussolini essay was that fascism was a rejection of previous models: “Granted that the 19th century was the century of marxism, liberalism, democracy, this does not mean that the 20th century must also be the century of marxism, liberalism, democracy. Political doctrines pass; nations remain. We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the Right, a Fascist century. If the 19th century was the century of the individual (liberalism implies individualism) we are free to believe that this is the ‘collective’ century, and therefore the century of the State.”
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 09:12:00 UTC
-
WATCH. SHARE. GET ANGRY. GET READY
WATCH. SHARE. GET ANGRY. GET READY
https://twitter.com/TeaBoots/status/1103262942496215047
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 08:57:00 UTC
-
The smoke of war drifts on the horizon
The smoke of war drifts on the horizon.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 08:49:00 UTC
-
“If you won’t fight, you don’t matter.”— It’s not complicated
–“If you won’t fight, you don’t matter.”—
It’s not complicated.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-06 19:24:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103375743013154816
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53439770_10157032235317264_607085794
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53439770_10157032235317264_6070857949872390144_n_10157032235312264.jpg PATCH STRATEGY: UNITY
1. THE NATURAL LAW
2. THE RELIGION
3. THE NATIONJWarren PrescottI like the Knights of natural law and the impending, unforeseen consequences of a black swan. It’s like an open threat 😁Mar 6, 2019, 2:59 PMJWarren PrescottI wonder if Hugo Boss would still accept a commission for uniforms… 😁Mar 6, 2019, 3:04 PMEamon O’NeillMeh for the St George’s Cross in Europes. Could he solved with making one with erins harp for Ireland. 😂Mar 6, 2019, 3:19 PMAndy Ujku-DardaniaWhat is the significance of the Black Swan?Mar 6, 2019, 3:22 PMMartin ŠtěpánOriginally from Hume. You can’t ever say black swans don’t exist just because you’ve never seen one. You’d have to be certain that you’ve seen every single swan. Funnily enough, black swans have actually been found later.
Black swan event is the one you don’t believe could realistically arise. And then it does.Mar 6, 2019, 3:49 PMIvar Diederik(If you’re going to have actual badges printed, move the S a little to the right, so that it doesn’t touch the outer circle.)Mar 6, 2019, 4:14 PMZach QuarryOh yeah!!! How do I get both?Mar 6, 2019, 7:01 PMMark Di RussoShardMar 6, 2019, 8:56 PMTom BielerPVC with Velcro pleaseMar 6, 2019, 9:40 PMFrancesco PrincipiI prefer “Unus sid leo” (Esopo)Mar 7, 2019, 7:51 AMCurt DoolittleFixed. Thank you for catching it. The “S” was the wrong font size.Mar 7, 2019, 9:51 AMPATCH STRATEGY: UNITY
1. THE NATURAL LAW
2. THE RELIGION
3. THE NATION
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-06 14:39:00 UTC
-
“If you won’t fight, you don’t matter.”— It’s not complicated
–“If you won’t fight, you don’t matter.”—
It’s not complicated.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-06 14:23:00 UTC
-
by Rosenborg Predmetsky Something I’ve been considering: A forceful imposition o
by Rosenborg Predmetsky
Something I’ve been considering: A forceful imposition of obscenity laws that criminalizes and censors pornography and public display of sexually arousing material, because the catastrophic psychological insecurity created in women by such media is precisely what motivates them to so profoundly resent men that they engage in their sociopathic revaluation of values that privileges the morbidly obese, the ugly, the mutilated, the masculinized, etc.
Men exist not only to protect women from other men, but also from the ruthlessness of intra-sexual competition between women, and we protect women from other women, because the female underclass lashes out at males when they are made to feel worthless.
Women have a need to be desired, seen and recognized, and being sexually desirable is one of their main means of doing so. On the one hand, the unnatural supra-normal stimulus generated by the ubiquity of fattening food and a sedentary lifestyle, has caused women to become monstrously ugly, and on the other hand, totally unrealistic portrayals of female beauty causes even the more attractive women to be extremely insecure. So the situation we’re in is *profoundly* unnatural.
Women need to test men to feel safe and desired, to test their loyalty and desire. But they can never feel safe or desired in our current context, and their reaction to this despair is the kind of despairing rage that is the rough equivalent of a mass incel shooting among men. I think even 2nd wave feminists are actually on to something when they argue that women shouldn’t have to shave their bodies or face.
Some women will complain that men are stifling their sexual expression. And they are right. But men need to learn to say “no” to women. Cultivating a healthy limiting impulse would lead to much happier men and women alike. Patriarchy, properly understood and implemented, is a necessary precondition for a healthy society because female sexuality is always already as aggressive and dominating as men, just in different ways.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-06 10:42:00 UTC