(FB 1551967924 Timestamp) THE DOCTRINE OF FASCISM (via @[100010386694913:2048:Richard Heathen] ) “Or ‘you don’t know it, but you’re a fascist – and it’s a good thing” Fascism advocates the organization of the state in the interests of the nation (people, race). Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Doctrine_of_Fascism The Essay: http://library.flawlesslogic.com/fascism.htm Overview “The Doctrine of Fascism” (Italian: “La dottrina del fascismo”) is an essay attributed to Benito Mussolini. In truth, the first part of the essay, entitled “Idee Fondamentali” (Italian for “Fundamental Ideas”) was written by philosopher Giovanni Gentile, while only the second part (“Dottrina politica e sociale”) is the work of Mussolini himself. It was first published in the Enciclopedia Italiana of 1932, as the first section of a lengthy entry on “Fascismo” (Italian for Fascism). The entire entry on Fascism spans pages 847รขยย884 of the Enciclopedia Italiana, and includes numerous photographs and graphic images. The Mussolini entry starts on page 847 and ends on 851 with the credit line “Benito Mussolini.” All subsequent translations of “The Doctrine of Fascism” are from this work. A key concept of the Mussolini essay was that fascism was a rejection of previous models: “Granted that the 19th century was the century of marxism, liberalism, democracy, this does not mean that the 20th century must also be the century of marxism, liberalism, democracy. Political doctrines pass; nations remain. We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the Right, a Fascist century. If the 19th century was the century of the individual (liberalism implies individualism) we are free to believe that this is the ‘collective’ century, and therefore the century of the State.”
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551966596 Timestamp) The smoke of war drifts on the horizon.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551980123 Timestamp) —“When the next fascist movement rises again we need to ensure that sophists are dealt with accordingly. Never again can we allow this to happen again because of these sophists and bullshitters The coming generation of europeans will either perish or reach the stars. Lets hope they reach the stars.”—Phill Knyspel
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552059201 Timestamp) We oughtta just buy russian military equipment. They are organized as a civilization to produce better military products than we are, and they have a superior military strategy. What they don’t have is rule of law, a high trust polity, and sufficient wealth and numbers to compete in the production of those weapons. If they supplied the west with weapons there would be symbiosis the same way that there is manufacturing symbiosis with Germany.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552057171 Timestamp) DIVISIVE? DIVISIVE? STUPIDITY IS WHAT’S DIVISIVE (the answer to the right) I worked to save my people from that false promise of liberty, and its baiting into moral hazard, by our ancestral enemy, under rothbardian libertinism. I was divisive in attacking rothbard and less so mises and hoppe. But I didn’t punch right unless someone punched me first. Although, I have to confess when I felt the fascists were going to continue to us down after C-ville, I more than considered it – and rightly so. Next, the New Right Wing Postmodernists came after me – seeking attention. Then Spencer came out with a quip, and then The Woo Woo Christians felt emboldened and rallied, and now the fascists are laying ground once again. There is zero reason to talk about me. There is zero reason for infighting between: – Fascists (rule of man by inspiration), – Nomocrats: Rule of Law by science, and; – Christians (Rule of Priests by woo woo). If you want to criticize rule of law, rule of man, or rule of ‘religion’ then do so. I do. But then, if you personalize that attack by taking on ‘one of the right’ rather than the general rule, you’re just a click-seeking attention-whore, doing the right a disservice. These are the three ancestral classes of our elites:
- Warriors, Soldiers (Masculine Defense),
“Those who Fight (Father)”
-and- Judges and Governors(Cooperation), Burghers, Business, Farmers
“Those who Work (Brother)”
-and-
- Priests and Public Intellectuals (Feminine Consumption)
“Those Who Pray (Educate, Mother)”
And we use our three classes of elites to our advantage and we keep them incompetition to ensure that we can use each as needed. At present all three classes: Fascists (Dominant Force ), Nomocrats (Practical Trade) and the Religious (Submissive Resistance) all all searching for a solution given that the Right Has Failed. Now, I’m pretty sure that y’all got nuthin, because (a) there is no fascist leader of any ability and there won’t be until fascism is re-articulated in adult language, (b) religion of the christian type only survived as a wife to the aristocracy – and islam is winning the war of ‘monopolies’, And at present, christianity is past its expiration date – because without operational means of governing an educated population it’s irrelevant and relegated to either the bible belt, or providing comfort to the outcast and underclass in the rest of the country. So only a fascist or a group of nomocrats are possible, and christianity has to simply pick one or both to bet on because christians have no answer – and frandkly appear ‘cucked’ and perhaps the source of current ‘cuckery’. So as far as I know we need a fascist (strong man leader), nomocracy (rule of law by which to govern a complex polity), and christians as a block to move the body faithful out of a condition of failure. It takes all three. However, the only means of governing a polity is and always will be law and economic information, because they are the ONLY POSSIBLE MEANS of operating a polity of greater scale than a village congregation.
- Warriors, Soldiers (Masculine Defense),
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552041503 Timestamp) SOMEONE COMPLAINED ABOUT ME ELSEWHERE …. (I thought I was promoting their ideas….) From the Rules….
- No Fed posting. It’s fine to want revolutionary change, but we don’t need to bring unwanted attention to yourself and the group. If you want to talk about that, for the love of God(s) don’t do it on Facebook, they can see everything you do.
- Keep it civil. Do you think of yourself as pillar standing above the ruins of modernity? Prove it by acting like a higher man, and not some uppity snivelling modern. This is a place for building unity and community.
- Confidentiality, no unauthorized screenshots. That’s an immediate ban.
- I don’t want to do the Christian v Pagan thing here. I’ve got my opinions of Christianity, and I know some of you have your opinions on Paganism. It’s a pointless debate that will do nothing, but sowing division. I’ll say it again, this is a place for building unity and community.
… Yep, that’s me. … Yep, that’s me. … Yep, that’s me. … Yep, that’s me. My goal with this group is to build fellowship, and that many of us will come to eventually see ourselves as brothers in arms. … I think maybe I should just leave the group. ๐ … I mean, they could have just ASKED me. … So….. I left the group. No axe to grind. We all fight the good fight as best we know how.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552059201 Timestamp) We oughtta just buy russian military equipment. They are organized as a civilization to produce better military products than we are, and they have a superior military strategy. What they don’t have is rule of law, a high trust polity, and sufficient wealth and numbers to compete in the production of those weapons. If they supplied the west with weapons there would be symbiosis the same way that there is manufacturing symbiosis with Germany.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552057171 Timestamp) DIVISIVE? DIVISIVE? STUPIDITY IS WHAT’S DIVISIVE (the answer to the right) I worked to save my people from that false promise of liberty, and its baiting into moral hazard, by our ancestral enemy, under rothbardian libertinism. I was divisive in attacking rothbard and less so mises and hoppe. But I didn’t punch right unless someone punched me first. Although, I have to confess when I felt the fascists were going to continue to us down after C-ville, I more than considered it – and rightly so. Next, the New Right Wing Postmodernists came after me – seeking attention. Then Spencer came out with a quip, and then The Woo Woo Christians felt emboldened and rallied, and now the fascists are laying ground once again. There is zero reason to talk about me. There is zero reason for infighting between: – Fascists (rule of man by inspiration), – Nomocrats: Rule of Law by science, and; – Christians (Rule of Priests by woo woo). If you want to criticize rule of law, rule of man, or rule of ‘religion’ then do so. I do. But then, if you personalize that attack by taking on ‘one of the right’ rather than the general rule, you’re just a click-seeking attention-whore, doing the right a disservice. These are the three ancestral classes of our elites:
- Warriors, Soldiers (Masculine Defense),
“Those who Fight (Father)”
-and- Judges and Governors(Cooperation), Burghers, Business, Farmers
“Those who Work (Brother)”
-and-
- Priests and Public Intellectuals (Feminine Consumption)
“Those Who Pray (Educate, Mother)”
And we use our three classes of elites to our advantage and we keep them incompetition to ensure that we can use each as needed. At present all three classes: Fascists (Dominant Force ), Nomocrats (Practical Trade) and the Religious (Submissive Resistance) all all searching for a solution given that the Right Has Failed. Now, I’m pretty sure that y’all got nuthin, because (a) there is no fascist leader of any ability and there won’t be until fascism is re-articulated in adult language, (b) religion of the christian type only survived as a wife to the aristocracy – and islam is winning the war of ‘monopolies’, And at present, christianity is past its expiration date – because without operational means of governing an educated population it’s irrelevant and relegated to either the bible belt, or providing comfort to the outcast and underclass in the rest of the country. So only a fascist or a group of nomocrats are possible, and christianity has to simply pick one or both to bet on because christians have no answer – and frandkly appear ‘cucked’ and perhaps the source of current ‘cuckery’. So as far as I know we need a fascist (strong man leader), nomocracy (rule of law by which to govern a complex polity), and christians as a block to move the body faithful out of a condition of failure. It takes all three. However, the only means of governing a polity is and always will be law and economic information, because they are the ONLY POSSIBLE MEANS of operating a polity of greater scale than a village congregation.
- Warriors, Soldiers (Masculine Defense),
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552149827 Timestamp) VALUE: Markets (LAW) vs Dictators (DISCRETION) And this is the value of strong men – change to what is known from what is unknown when one is not current but behind. The value of markets is in changing from current and known to future that is unknown. Efficient organization to produce a known by eliminating competition vs efficient organization to produce an unknown by competition.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552145789 Timestamp) —“What did you mean by articulating fascism in an adult manner? What would that require?”— Fascism is very close to (and mussolini said so) a religion. And IMO the final step in eradicating evil religions. And the germans french and italians came close to eradicating it. But without fascism(kin worship) to replace christianity, the bottom fell into the trap of marxism and universalism thereby simply revising christianity(judaism v2) into pseudoscience. There is no false promise to nation-worship. It’s the optimum strategy for any and every non-parasitic polity. The problem is that it’s not articulated operationally (performatively) or in law (programmatically), and as such it’s not possible to resolve conflicts over not only its meaning but what it would mean for people day to day, month to month, year to year – and why they wouldn’t be put on the same path to failure that hitler and mussolini put us on. I mean, everyone tried to universalize. The bolsheviks probably are the ones at fault. and the jews at fault in broader europe. But the fact that ‘continentals’ still take from the church, rousseau, kant, hegel et all with their secular moralistic romantic prose means they are still failing just as the new right in europe has failed. The end result has to be inspiring. But it has to be inspiring because it is POSSIBLE to run a complex defense, polity, economy and kin group with some set of limits beyond which a leader is only masking failure to be able to do so. I mean, in the end you run out of revolutionary energy by which to bring people together. You have to eventually ‘govern’. No fascist has succeeded in ‘governing’ other than China. And china does it because of a vast specialized bureaucracy in doing it. And even they needed to hand over most of production to the middle class to prevent universal corruption that happens under arbitrary rule. So how do we produce a system of government encoded in rules (law) for a fascist government? Well. My work is pretty fucking fascist. And I think ethnocentrism is a message that will increasingly sell. And it doesn’t require an emergent leader. And I prefer monarchy over dictator for hoppeian reasons. So the problem remains how to create a ‘religion’ of fascism (inspiration), among american (or anglo in general) people for whom continental submission is not only unnatural but antithetical? The only answer is to embody that ‘discretion’ in a monarchy whose only reason for existence is what we call fascist: the nation as an army. Napoleon invented total war, and the nation state. But the fascists invented the total state as a continuous war of genetics, culture, economics, politics, and violence against other cultures in defense of the nation (people). I DO understand most people need to learn by doing, learn by experience, learn by instruction, and function by following rules – but one must have something to instruct them in that is relatively free of ‘appropriation’ and ‘floating’. Ergo, one needs to own the means of introducing each of those demands for learning: religion (experience), doing (ritual), instruction (School), and what to instruct them in a literature, and the means of operating that system (rules), and means of limiting ‘float’ in that system (law). I don’t quite know how to ‘sell’ fascism but I know how to sell monarchy, discretionary rule in the production of commons, and ethnocentrism and soft eugenics, so that we continue our history.