(FB 1546101347 Timestamp) One BEGS for Liberty by permission. One FORCES sovereignty at the point of a spear, tip of an arrow, blade of a sword, and barrel of a gun. That’s the difference between failed beggars for liberty and successful warriors for sovereignty.
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546125351 Timestamp) Ruling, Governing, and Teaching are three different strategies. Ruling is a military and judicial occupation. Governing a middle class occupation. Teaching an academic occupation. You get a priest, communist, or politician in that distribution ANYWHERE then you’re people are being deceived.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546101347 Timestamp) One BEGS for Liberty by permission. One FORCES sovereignty at the point of a spear, tip of an arrow, blade of a sword, and barrel of a gun. That’s the difference between failed beggars for liberty and successful warriors for sovereignty.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546264291 Timestamp) WALTER RUSSELL MEAD ON 2018’S ENDING OF THE LIBERAL ORDER Now we need to replace it with something much better.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546205702 Timestamp) Lemme’ tell ya’ somthin’. Somthin’ import’nt. There is a reason Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Smith/Hume, Nietzsche, and their kind all write what they do: to remind us that those sensibilities we apply at local scale, and that are so useful at local scale, do not scale to international scale. in other words, in every era some thinker must remind the dominant forces, that morality is a local contrivance for utilitarian purposes and not an intrinsic good. And that in order to maintain those utilitarian properties of our local order, some of us, at least the military, judiciary, and monarchy, must never make the mistake that civility is an advantage outside of the polity any more than socialism is an advantage outside of the family, or democracy outside of the neighborhood. That’s my job for this era.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546205219 Timestamp) NO MORE RINSE AND REPEAT by Bill Joslin A complete breakdown of civility creates the circumstance for the right type of militia to rise and out of that the right type of elites to take over. Anything else is a rinse and repeat of what’s always occurred in the past – revolutions as proxies and vassals of stronger sovereigns.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546201719 Timestamp) Libertarians always think small. War is a profitable exercise. For some of us it is our favorite occupation. The problems arise from ruling, colonizing, and commingling. But the lessons of history are unambiguous: the wholesale removal of people from territory is always and everywhere the optimum business venture.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546264291 Timestamp) WALTER RUSSELL MEAD ON 2018’S ENDING OF THE LIBERAL ORDER Now we need to replace it with something much better.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546195671 Timestamp) THIS IS WHY WE DON’T NEED A MOB. by Bill Joslin With the current state of affairs, in the first world, a total breakdown of civility would occur through spontaneous short term, erratic street violence (riots, looting. Which congregated, then disperses to re-congregate elsewhere) inside the OODA-LOOP of authorities. (See Toronto G20 tactics of black bloc) From a standpoint of cybernetics, this creates a circumstance and action with in third parties. Party one: rioters, party two: law enforcement… Party one renders party two ineffective which results in party three (everyone else) to react. Law enforcement will either up-authoritarian tactics (see kettling of Toronto G20 on day three) which makes life unbearable for party three, or if law enforcement doesn’t ramp up authority, continues to demonstrate their ineffectiveness – which party three then loses faith in law enforcement (i.e. status quo) (see Sons of Odin and block watch groups in the UK around emerging no go zones) In other words, men of action – tradesmen, army, engineers (as Tom laid-out) will take matters into their own hands – no out of political ideology, heroism or profit, but rather to protect their loved one, their community and their property. By establishing small territories of peace and security (neighbourhoods, two or three block radius) – other in surrounding areas will migrate too or join in their tactics. Essentially what they do is create the first two commons – monopoly of violence over an area (territory) and trust. (See “warlords” in eastern Ukraine with community courts and patrols)… Naturally, organically, instinctively – they create the very foundation of of the changes we seek – without any affiliation, central command, ideology, thought leaders. What we need to do is ensure they understand what it is they are doing, why they do it, and why they had to do it(property, reciprocity). This is so they don’t seek to re-establish status quo and hand over their safe zones to the old regime – we must show them WHY THEY MUST LEAD and continue to do so. We dont need a mob, an army etc, because good men, in times of need, will stand and defend their loved ones, their kith and kin and Their property. Our societies are not filled with gun owning, would-be-revolutionaries. They are filled with dad’s, husbands, brothers – sheepdogs, who don’t want to see the commons they spend their days building and maintaining totally destroyed for ideological agendas. In the US these guys tend to be the ones who own guns – they tend to also be cautious (because they have something to lose) and tend to be the last to a fight, and the last stand if it can message to that. (Which is why the state of affairs continues unchallenged as of yet) (I’ll take these guys over well versed, well trained, ideologues any day. Zealots chap my ass)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546218298 Timestamp) ÐРУÐЬЯ Ð ÐÐÐÐÐ ÐÑивеÑ. Ð Ðиеве еÑÑÑ Ð»Ñди, коÑоÑÑе Ñ Ð¾ÑÑÑ Ð¾ÑганизоваÑÑ Ð²ÑÑÑеÑÑ “Propertarian”. Я Ñ Ð¾Ñел бÑ, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ ÑÑо пÑоизоÑло. ÐÑли возможно и желаÑелÑно, Ñ Ð¿ÑиÑоединÑÑÑÑ Ðº ÑобÑÐ°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ ÑÐºÐ°Ð¹Ð¿Ñ (Ñ Ð½Ðµ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ñ Ð±ÑÑÑ Ñам ÑейÑаÑ). Ðам ÑÑо инÑеÑеÑно? СпаÑибо