Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

( Apologies for letting me rant a bit on the primary subject of my work. 😉 Let’

( Apologies for letting me rant a bit on the primary subject of my work. 😉 Let’s fix the constitution with a third american revolution…. )

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 21:43:36 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174076460866441216

Reply addressees: @JoshMBlackman @CatoInstitute

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174076257140649985

IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@JoshMBlackman @CatoInstitute It’s exasperating that a hole in our constitution that neither demands ascent of the supreme court, nor demands warranty by its legislators, nor provides means of returning an undecidable case to the state, is obfuscated by discussions of independence instead.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174076257140649985

IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@JoshMBlackman @CatoInstitute It’s exasperating that a hole in our constitution that neither demands ascent of the supreme court, nor demands warranty by its legislators, nor provides means of returning an undecidable case to the state, is obfuscated by discussions of independence instead.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174076257140649985

September 17, 2019
Who is “They”?

Who is “They”? https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/17/who-is-they/

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 21:18:54 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174070247453802496

September 17, 2019
Who is “They”?

Those who seek to destroy sovereignty, rule of law by reciprocity, the intergenerational family as the purpose of policy, the compromise between the genders and classes, the markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, nations.

Reductively, “Parasites.”

“You”

😉

September 17, 2019
Who is “They”?

Those who seek to destroy sovereignty, rule of law by reciprocity, the intergenerational family as the purpose of policy, the compromise between the genders and classes, the markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, nations.

Reductively, “Parasites.”

“You”

😉

September 17, 2019
Those who seek to destroy sovereignty, rule of law by reciprocity, the intergene

Those who seek to destroy sovereignty, rule of law by reciprocity, the intergenerational family as the purpose of policy, the compromise between the genders and classes, the markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, nations.

“You.” 😉

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 21:16:16 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174069584036544512

Reply addressees: @Brian_Alford @sarahfranks2120 @DineshDSouza

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174066673499770880

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174066673499770880

September 17, 2019
state against the people (See Benjamin Ginsberg), against the people, inability

… state against the people (See Benjamin Ginsberg), against the people, inability to create commons of their own, dependence on higher trust moral polities. Match this with differences in rates of mental illness and sexual dimorphism (cognitive, sexual, behavioral, criminal),

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 20:24:05 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174056452677353472

Reply addressees: @Simon_Whitten

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174055900363067394

IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@Simon_Whitten Specializing in unproductive (parasitic) income sources, especially those that privatize the commons, especially the moral, using the profits to seek rents, baiting into moral hazard, justification by Pilpul, undermining by Critique, Non argument by GSRRM, alliance with the …

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174055900363067394

IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@Simon_Whitten Specializing in unproductive (parasitic) income sources, especially those that privatize the commons, especially the moral, using the profits to seek rents, baiting into moral hazard, justification by Pilpul, undermining by Critique, Non argument by GSRRM, alliance with the …

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174055900363067394

September 17, 2019
Uniting Conservatives with Understanding of One Another

Uniting Conservatives with Understanding of One Another https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/17/uniting-conservatives-with-understanding-of-one-another/

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 19:34:34 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174043991068819456

September 17, 2019
Abortion? Ok. One Immoral Trade for Another

Abortion? Ok. One Immoral Trade for Another. https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/17/abortion-ok-one-immoral-trade-for-another/

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 18:50:48 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174032975882850310

September 17, 2019
So, net net is that you want to end leftism’s attack on symbols in the commons?

So, net net is that you want to end leftism’s attack on symbols in the commons?

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 13:38:18 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173954332531789825

Reply addressees: @Semiogogue

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173717263200993280

IN REPLY TO:

@Semiogogue

@curtdoolittle Consciously and intentionally return non-linguistic environmental, resource and territorial marks to the commons.

Our cooperative behavior evolved around their reliability. Their reliability is now in question. This strikes at the heart of all our cooperative behavior.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173717263200993280

September 17, 2019
Because the right has reached consensus that there is no other choice. Without i

Because the right has reached consensus that there is no other choice. Without immigration they would have won the scientific, intellectual and political battle of the 20th century. Because of it we lose democracy. And you did it.

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 13:37:09 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173954040968990721

Reply addressees: @Brian_Alford @DineshDSouza

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173818423110815744

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173818423110815744

September 17, 2019