|PROCESS|Traditional Law (Constitutionalism) > Utility > Postwar Morality > Economics > Obama-chaos > Decline > Civil War. [W]e didn’t have a ‘bible’ of western civ beyond which no man may tread. That’s the beginning of the problem: tradition vs articulation of the science under our tradition. We didn’t organize against neoliberalism. We had no scientific answer to neo-liberalism (neo-marxism). We won against marxism simply by its demonstrated failure. We didn’t organize against immigration like we did against communism. That’s the problem first problem. We didn’t organize to achieve against islamic fundamentalism as we organized against communism. That’s the problem. Without immigration we would have won (a) Rule of law (b) economics, (c) social norms (d) religion and education. The only reason we lost so far is women voting, that suppressed the ability of men to defend against women’s voting patterns.
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
The American Postwar Failure Financed by American Debt
|PROCESS|Traditional Law (Constitutionalism) > Utility > Postwar Morality > Economics > Obama-chaos > Decline > Civil War. [W]e didn’t have a ‘bible’ of western civ beyond which no man may tread. That’s the beginning of the problem: tradition vs articulation of the science under our tradition. We didn’t organize against neoliberalism. We had no scientific answer to neo-liberalism (neo-marxism). We won against marxism simply by its demonstrated failure. We didn’t organize against immigration like we did against communism. That’s the problem first problem. We didn’t organize to achieve against islamic fundamentalism as we organized against communism. That’s the problem. Without immigration we would have won (a) Rule of law (b) economics, (c) social norms (d) religion and education. The only reason we lost so far is women voting, that suppressed the ability of men to defend against women’s voting patterns.
-
Why Universal Nationalism vs Globalism
Why Universal Nationalism vs Globalism https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/why-universal-nationalism-vs-globalism/
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 22:45:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179890255123668992
-
Why Universal Nationalism vs Globalism
WHY UNIVERSAL NATIONALISM VS GLOBALISM by Curt Doolittle
—“I do universal nationalism. Why? Because natural law judges it as the only not-immoral means of cooperation. But that doesn’t tell you much. Instead it’s because “all men are distant relations cooperating to raise their people by the production of commons information, goods, and services, best suited to doing so despite our differences in rate of development bias in temperament and bias in distribution of abilities.” And if we construct states as extensions of the family, household, clan, tribe, and nation, we have elites who serve the interests of their people on their terms, and the smallest proximity-to-influence-and power that is possible. And we ameliorate our differences not through politics, power, and commons, but through trade of information, goods, and services. If we do otherwise, under globalism, we put those people into competition, where there is one small global elite with interest in one another, and a host of common people suffering their rule. So there is no system of rule superior to universal nationalism, with tolerance for migration of elites for trade purposes – but prohibiting them from local political enfranchise and social involvement, and public speech.”–
-
Western Tripartism Made Quadripartism
Western Tripartism Made Quadripartism https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/western-tripartism-made-quadripartism/
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 21:32:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179871773317369870
-
Western Tripartism Made Quadripartism
ARISTOCRACY: WESTERN TRIPARTISM MADE QUADRIPARTISM “THOSE WHO FIGHT” (Military, Judiciary, Sheriffs) Those Who Enforce The Natural Law “THOSE WHO PRAY” (Academy) Those Who Teach The Natural and Physical Laws “THOSE WHO ORGANIZE” (Middle Class) Those Who Organize Those Who Labor Under the Natural and Physical laws “THOSE WHO LABOR” (Lower middle, Working, Laboring) Those Who Labor Under The Natural and Physical Laws
-
Western Tripartism Made Quadripartism
ARISTOCRACY: WESTERN TRIPARTISM MADE QUADRIPARTISM “THOSE WHO FIGHT” (Military, Judiciary, Sheriffs) Those Who Enforce The Natural Law “THOSE WHO PRAY” (Academy) Those Who Teach The Natural and Physical Laws “THOSE WHO ORGANIZE” (Middle Class) Those Who Organize Those Who Labor Under the Natural and Physical laws “THOSE WHO LABOR” (Lower middle, Working, Laboring) Those Who Labor Under The Natural and Physical Laws
-
Can We Create A New Federalist Papers?
TO: John Mark 1) I have the ‘last 30 day’ plan ready. It’s going to blow people away. But we can’t do it until next spring at the earliest. Just letting you know that it’s going to surprise people, it will bring in the people to act, and that combined with ‘hitting the road’ is going to work. I’m not going to talk about it until the last minute. 2) Is there a chance you would be willing to do a video per article of the constitution over the winter so that we get into a discussion like the federalist papers? i mean, interview style we walk through the constitution and we cover law and policy. This is what people will be interested in. I think this is waaaay too much to ask of you. So I’ll try to find someone else if you can’t, but I think a series of shorter videos on each article of teh constitution, including the declaration, preamble, man, and law is worth doing. it’ll end up being federalist papers set two and it might be the means by which we hit even more mainstream people.
FROM John Mark [Y]es. I think it’s a fantastic idea. It would really help people understand it and drive home to them how advanced a stage it’s in (“this is real”). Doing short (or even, say 1-hr) videos with you interview/conversation style is actually way easier and much less time consuming than my normal style videos because there’s so much less video/image editing required (that’s the time-consuming part). If I can get my sound setup sorted out so that I don’t even have to adjust sound levels afterward, it’s easy.
-
The Constitution of Political Conspiracies
The Constitution of Political Conspiracies https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/the-constitution-of-political-conspiracies/
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 21:18:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179868232297123841
-
The Constitution of Political Conspiracies
THE CONSTITUTION OF POLITICAL CONSPIRACIES
—“The purpose of policy is to destroy the family?”— A Twitter Critic
[I] think you, like most victims of 20th C pseudoscience attribute greater agency to our intentions, and stated intent over external consequence. Conspiracies of common cognitive bias, common interest are endemic even if common intent isn’t – outside of those with such agency. Learn the technique of false promise, baiting into moral hazard, pilpul (via positiva), critique (via negativa), and its common thread in the three monotheistic religions, marxism, pomo, feminism, and political correctness – but insightfully, the female strategy of undermining. To say its a conspiracy of intent would require intentionality of female anti-social expression (psychosis, promiscuity, undermining, reputation destruction). Instead, social super-predation (undermining) is instinctual for most; a political strategy some & deliberate for others. Useful idiots constitute the vast majority of the population (I know, I have iffy followers too.) For whom the portfolio of sentiments need be satisfied, not the central object of stated policy. Humans account for calories(consumption), and status(opportunity) almost exclusively. Just as economic policy consists of pulling a small number of levers to produce externalities by design, social and political policy consists of many more levers which produce direct objective and external objectives. Rarely if ever is the stated policy the central objective. This is why the declaration, constitution, and bill of rights are an adequate attempt to restate norman,anglo-saxon, germanic traditional law as natural law, expressed in specific rights. But lacking strict construction from the foundations of that law, the constitution was weak. The anglo constitutions from which our prosperity originates were written for people of shared moral and ethical intuition, with a shared history of means of dispute resolution,with limited power distance,and limited difference in means of production of family, goods, & services. The industrialization of lying by sophism and pseudoscience, denialism, and deceit using new media in the 19th 20th, and the capture of ‘preaching’ in school, academy, and media by profiting from use of this technique has left the 20th a repeat of the first-second century. Hayek and Poincare were right: the 20th will be remembered as a repeat of christianization and islamization of the ancient world – this time with sophism, pseudoscience and denial,instead of sophism, supernaturalism and denial:false promise of reversing the consequences of genes. I don’t err. It’s my job not to. -Cheers.