Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • The Left confuses PROGRESS with CONSUMPTION. And OPPRESSION with DOMESTICATION.

    The Left confuses PROGRESS with CONSUMPTION. And OPPRESSION with DOMESTICATION. We evolved Property, Law, Markets and resulting Eugenics to limit Hyper-Consumption, and Impose domestication upon semi-human animals by constraining the reproduction of both genders to what they could produce. One can spend increases in production but if one just spends down accumulated genetic capital, one is not engaging in progress, but burning the winter stores for an endless fall feast. Only far east and far west produced majority genetic middle class civilizations. And Redistribution under ‘democracy’ reversed five thousand years of western civilization’s domestication of human polities in just a century.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-18 10:46:00 UTC

  • “The way I think about it is; only a pre-existing state is capable of preventing

    —“The way I think about it is; only a pre-existing state is capable of preventing people from forming a new state, so libertarianism is less “doomed to fail” than it is a complete nonstarter.”—James Brittingham

    MONARCHY = PRIVATE PROPERTY STATE

    It’s also doomed to fail, since the balance of commons vs private consumption isn’t possible unless the monarchy owns the territory, collects rents on it, and produces commons from the rent, thereby making all parties, including the state, private property owners.

    P-MONARCHY

    In P I argue that a monarchy can only survive corporally in the age of gunpowder b/c it’s dependent upon the militia and military rather than an alliance of land-holding families of professional warriors – with the relationship between militia and monarchy governed by rule of law. I prefer income taxes over land taxes, and I prefer rental income be limited to the monarchy or ‘the church’, just as I prefer consumer credit be handled by the monarchy, and the privatization of all bureaucracy as customer service organizations – thus preventing rent-seeking across the spectrum. Unions then serve as insurers of relations, and insurers fulfill their functions of insurers of property, and families return to insurers of kin, and we, incrementally wipe all rent seeking off the map, driving all capital into longer and longer and larger and larger investment and return cycles. It is possible to restore responsibility and accountability because the economy will be purged of innumeracy and itself returned ot ‘accountability’. ie: no more financial and economic lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-18 10:38:00 UTC

  • QUESTION: —“Curt I have a question for you. Do you think that there is any pos

    QUESTION: —“Curt I have a question for you. Do you think that there is any possibility of a tyrant getting in charge of the USA should it descend into civil war for separation? Or do we think this can be done by democratic processes in place? The latter one I think realistically doesn’t have a chance.”—

    There is a possibility of democratic process *IF* we propose a solution that is a superior alternative to certain conflict. This is what I hope to do. But the public won’t accept that until the conflict is certain. Which will happen soon.

    Any democrat is by definition a tyrant, because any rule by legislation rather than rule by law of reciprocity is by definition despotism.

    My hope, and most probable is a military takeover of the government. The problem is that the military needs something to enforce. So we must provide them with the market demand (up rising), moral license (to prevent chaos and civil war), and solution (that they can enforce to maintain the peace).

    We will need to act before the election. That’s all I can tell you. And that is why I’m working so hard to get enough done to provide that solution – at the last minute.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 17:21:00 UTC

  • TRUMP HAS GONE FULL PROPERTARIAN —“The word ‘reciprocity’ is probably my favor

    TRUMP HAS GONE FULL PROPERTARIAN

    —“The word ‘reciprocity’ is probably my favorite word’— Trump

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 08:07:00 UTC

  • RT @MattPirkowski: If you want to go fast, choose authoritarianism. If you want

    RT @MattPirkowski: If you want to go fast, choose authoritarianism.

    If you want to go far, choose democracy.

    Impatience is the hobgoblin…


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:24:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184565842303954945

  • (De politicization is attractive. It is also desirable. Tyranny is just an means

    (De politicization is attractive. It is also desirable. Tyranny is just an means of depoliticization that produces many negative externalities.)

    Love your posts. Underlying organization of thought also consistent. And it’s rare. Awesome to find you. -cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:22:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184565395405070336

    Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182349096104783872


    IN REPLY TO:

    @MattPirkowski

    There exists an attractiveness to tyranny, a certain aesthetic that, siren-like, lures many into the arms of the absolute with the promise of defining one’s own unstable identity in the presumptively stable axioms of the tyrant.

    Yet like all siren songs, to succumb is to die.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182349096104783872

  • (via positiva figures are unhelpful, but via-negativa (judge of last resort, or

    (via positiva figures are unhelpful, but via-negativa (judge of last resort, or monarchy with veto) provide excellence defense against the breakdown into folly of decision making processes, due to malinvestment by coalitions.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:18:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184564278851964928

    Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183825116435644416


    IN REPLY TO:

    @MattPirkowski

    That being said, I still prefer solutions that don’t require the election of centralized figureheads, and instead favor ways of aggregating competence-weighted representation using the tools of the information age rather than those of the equestrian age.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183825116435644416

  • Nationalism is a taboo in the jewish identitarian movement. Immigration empowers

    Nationalism is a taboo in the jewish identitarian movement. Immigration empowers their block. Socialism is always an objective b/c jews are cognitively/strategically female (undermining). Jewish financial governance weak european rule of law, and large consumer base is optimum.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 20:33:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184205800585211905

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184121649890758657


    IN REPLY TO:

    @StefanMolyneux

    Only 26% of Jewish Americans approve of the job that Trump is doing as president (lowest of any religious group), while a staggering 71% disapprove.

    Why is that do you think?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184121649890758657

  • 7) I don’t make errors. Don’t bother trying to refute it. Try to understand it.

    7) I don’t make errors. Don’t bother trying to refute it. Try to understand it. Belt Tightening will come either by the restoration of nationalism, capital accumulation, and economic and political eugenics or it will come from collapse.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 14:01:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184107076148191233

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @EveningStandard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184106639416287232


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 6) And in doing so created scarcity of the very goods you seek to hyper-consume. Humans are not insulated from the laws of physics and our productivity, particularly by the consumption of hydrocarbons, not as the liberals presumed – infinite. Welcome to consequences you created.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184106639416287232


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 6) And in doing so created scarcity of the very goods you seek to hyper-consume. Humans are not insulated from the laws of physics and our productivity, particularly by the consumption of hydrocarbons, not as the liberals presumed – infinite. Welcome to consequences you created.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184106639416287232

  • 4) But cooperative necessity in social orders, like gravity in physical orders,

    4) But cooperative necessity in social orders, like gravity in physical orders, is inescapable – and resistance is expected but ultimately futile. Your mistake is confusing PROGRESS with CONSUMPTION. And confusing OPPRESSION with DOMESTICATION.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 13:56:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184105849666584577

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @EveningStandard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184105414046162946


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 3) The left is by demonstrated preference cognitively feminine: consumptive, reproductive, maternal, the right masculine: conservative, capital producing, paternal. And women resist tightening the belt more than men do. So you will continue to tighten your belt and resist it all.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184105414046162946


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JonHaidt @EveningStandard 3) The left is by demonstrated preference cognitively feminine: consumptive, reproductive, maternal, the right masculine: conservative, capital producing, paternal. And women resist tightening the belt more than men do. So you will continue to tighten your belt and resist it all.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184105414046162946