Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

Republicans claim to be a populist movement, not the Right. The right claims to

Republicans claim to be a populist movement, not the Right. The right claims to be a NATIONALIST movement. Republicans still live under the illusion that civic nationalism is possible. It’s isn’t. It’s just the last stage before reverse extermination of host peoples.

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 18:49:47 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190702559729725440

Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190673703740354563

IN REPLY TO:

@StefanMolyneux

The Right claims to be a populist movement, yet refuses to reflect the populist view – a significant majority – that legal immigration needs to be severely curtailed.

GOP, repeat after me:

You CANNOT be a leader if you are afraid of the media. https://t.co/v6alGnPfuy

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190673703740354563

November 2, 2019
WIthin a year, there shall be no ‘media’ to fear

WIthin a year, there shall be no ‘media’ to fear.

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 18:46:15 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190701670608584704

Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190673703740354563

IN REPLY TO:

@StefanMolyneux

The Right claims to be a populist movement, yet refuses to reflect the populist view – a significant majority – that legal immigration needs to be severely curtailed.

GOP, repeat after me:

You CANNOT be a leader if you are afraid of the media. https://t.co/v6alGnPfuy

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190673703740354563

November 2, 2019
“A republic will always end up run by an aristocracy or an oligarchy. In the cas

—“A republic will always end up run by an aristocracy or an oligarchy. In the case of the (originally) aristocratic republic of the US, incremental democratization (esp. after 1828), mass… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=497750404155188&id=100017606988153

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 01:10:49 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190436063808040962

November 2, 2019
Everyone always underestimates here. She is a fabulous campaigner, has built an

Everyone always underestimates here. She is a fabulous campaigner, has built an exceptional organization, and she is excellent under pressure. I think everyone thinks biden will win, and most people think he’s waiting out the field, and that the others will move up and get eaten.

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 23:56:25 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190417338677571584

Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190413122198278148

IN REPLY TO:

@FullAccountant

@curtdoolittle I still think Biden will win, and I’m on an island by myself apparently. He is leading by significant margins in most polls. He has a very strong boomer base and African American base. Warren can win, but he will be difficult to beat. Especially in the south.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190413122198278148

November 1, 2019
Not that I care but it looks like we are left with pocahontas, biden, and bernie

Not that I care but it looks like we are left with pocahontas, biden, and bernie, wit it being very difficult to imagine anyone other than pocahontas at this point, although bernie won’t give… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=497699160826979&id=100017606988153

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 22:35:38 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190397011125788673

November 1, 2019
“A republic will always end up run by an aristocracy or an oligarchy. In the cas

—“A republic will always end up run by an aristocracy or an oligarchy. In the case of the (originally) aristocratic republic of the US, incremental democratization (esp. after 1828), mass lower class immigration and democratic control of the popular media (industrialization of propaganda)was the means by which a largely foreign oligarchy was able to supplant the formerly ruling WASP aristocracy in the 20th c. to the detriment of us all.”—Scott De Warren

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 21:10:00 UTC

November 1, 2019
“Politicide” Eliminate all of the enemy as well as traitors. And ending doing bo

“Politicide” Eliminate all of the enemy as well as traitors. And ending doing both saves us a few centuries of eugenic suppression of outliers. 😉

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 20:14:12 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190361416726908928

Reply addressees: @papaalejandro3 @EmperorInvictus @realjoshneal

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186978582687469568

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186978582687469568

November 1, 2019
“Believing” in force doesn’t tell us much. Demanding we organize to produce forc

“Believing” in force doesn’t tell us much. Demanding we organize to produce force to defend ourselves from the enemy; to produce commons by common investment by a central state; by private industry; by individuals; with zero tolerance for harms to our people is a good thing.

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 20:11:42 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190360790089523202

Reply addressees: @EmperorInvictus @SandraLeeKoeni2

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187137014359085056

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187137014359085056

November 1, 2019
Hmmm. I ‘believe’ in the use of force, to create a natural hierarchy (aristocrac

Hmmm. I ‘believe’ in the use of force, to create a natural hierarchy (aristocracy) with zero tolerance for imposition upon the interests of our (or any) people, when we are organized into nation states.

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 20:10:17 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190360432575483905

Reply addressees: @EmperorInvictus @SandraLeeKoeni2

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187137014359085056

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187137014359085056

November 1, 2019
I would happily debate Andrew because I am not aware of anyone else living who u

I would happily debate Andrew because I am not aware of anyone else living who understands issues of modernity as well as I do. Because some of his desire can be produced by moral rather than immoral means. But really, he’s not very smart he just says ‘free stuff!’ for attention.

Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:44:53 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190354038006730752

Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190353978216927238

IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard.
Unfortunately we let them vote into a single house of representatives, creating rule by majority-of-fools best deceived by false promise.
When if we had created houses for commoners, and women we could debate and trade.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190353978216927238

IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard.
Unfortunately we let them vote into a single house of representatives, creating rule by majority-of-fools best deceived by false promise.
When if we had created houses for commoners, and women we could debate and trade.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190353978216927238

November 1, 2019