Climate Change vs Demographic Change – Simple problem, Simple Solution: Stop underclass reproduction. Cause? Women in politics.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 08:21:00 UTC
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
the purpose the ancap movement is to justify ((())) separatism using sophisms th
the purpose the ancap movement is to justify ((())) separatism using sophisms that obviate the moral demand for contribution to commons.
Ancap fails the canary test: blackmail.
It’s ghetto ethics
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 01:58:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214365537758781440
Reply addressees: @HliosX @LoremEXP @dokidokipicnic @VarangianThe @NOTaWEEBiSWEAR @AnglishHund
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214358160695287808
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214358160695287808
-
We aren’t looking for a mainstream following. That’s a strategy for democracy. D
We aren’t looking for a mainstream following. That’s a strategy for democracy. Democracy is over.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-06 21:16:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214294802780569601
Reply addressees: @relocateromania @probiotical @JohnMarkSays @baconbkk
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1213969279571419136
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1213969279571419136
-
CONVENIENT CLASSIFICATIONS by James Dmitro Makienko If 4GW is done by state acto
CONVENIENT CLASSIFICATIONS
by James Dmitro Makienko
If 4GW is done by state actors it’s called “hybrid war”
If 4GW is done by non-state actors it’s called “terrorism”
Same violence.
Different benefactors
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-06 15:59:00 UTC
-
UNDERSTANDING A little frustrated with the conservative vox populi. The liberals
UNDERSTANDING
A little frustrated with the conservative vox populi. The liberals think you are evil for requiring meritocracy, and you think they have your agency. You’re both wrong. If you think people know what they’re doing then you tend to hate them. If you think all but a few of us are gene-machines and barely domesticated animals following genetic, traditional, cultural, and institutional programming, you just hate the programming that enables the irreciprocal bias in genes. I say this all the time but (a) I am pretty certain even those of us with cognitive agency are gene machines, (b) people have no idea what they’re doing, they’re just poorly trained animals,( c) that those of us with agency must create institutions, education, and rules (laws) to train and constrain the barely domesticated animals from falsehood an irrecirocity – even if it is against their will, and even if it requires force. (d) So I don’t hate people, (e) and I realize that words do not work when depriving people of their parasitism, rent seeking, and free riding, so (f) the poorly trained animals need those of us with agency to ‘do what we must’ to design, create, and enforce institutions, positive education, and negative rules (laws) that constrain them to truth, reciprocity, and therefore cooperation via exchange, and as a consequence the limiting of reproduction to self sufficiency – largely of the underclasses.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-06 15:32:00 UTC
-
UNDERSTANDING A little frustrated with the conservative vox populi. The liberals
UNDERSTANDING
A little frustrated with the conservative vox populi. The liberals think you are evil for requiring meritocracy, and you think they have your agency. You’re both wrong. If you think people know what they’re doing then you tend to hate them. If you think all but a few of us are gene-machines and barely domesticated animals following genetic, traditional, cultural, and institutional programming, then you just hate the programming that enables the irreciprocal bias in genes and not people. I say this all the time but (a) I am pretty certain even those of us with cognitive agency are also gene machines, (b) people have no idea what they’re doing, they’re just poorly trained animals,( c) that those of us with agency must create institutions, education, and rules (laws) to train and constrain the barely domesticated animals from falsehood an irrecirocity – even if it is against their will, and even if it requires force. (d) So I don’t hate people, (e) and I realize that words do not work when depriving people of their parasitism, rent seeking, and free riding, so (f) the poorly trained animals need those of us with agency to ‘do what we must’ to design, create, and enforce institutions, positive education, and negative rules (laws) that constrain them to truth, reciprocity, and therefore cooperation via exchange, and as a consequence the limiting of reproduction to self sufficiency – largely of the underclasses.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-06 15:31:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81849894_179172566814238_43690627875
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81849894_179172566814238_4369062787595370496_o_179172563480905.jpg Yes I am in favor of this war – for purely strategic reasons. And no I’m not wrong. It is to our advantage in every way possible – and very likely to Iran’s as well.
Yeah, sorry. I think things thru.
Iran has lots of ballistic missiles, conducts war through proxies (terrorist militias), has access to the saudi fields via the south, and the ability to disrupt world oil prices in the gulf. Wants to take over Iraq and Syria and have access to both gulf and Mediterranean. From their they will take the Saudis and the princedoms if the Turks, Saudis, Egyptians and Israelis don’t resist them. So they will have a corridor from the mediterranean to the Caucuses to Afghanistan and the indian ocean.
However, Iran has an antiquated military. And we are far beyond their ability to project power.
And you’re missing the point that global peace is no longer in our domestic interests either strategically or economically.
I hate quoting fiction other than the occasional Herbert, but “Chaos is a Ladder” of opportunity.
We want chaos this year and as much of it as possible.
Revolution comes.
—
Legend:
99th = World Military Rank
Country Name
Population / GDPYes I am in favor of this war – for purely strategic reasons. And no I’m not wrong. It is to our advantage in every way possible – and very likely to Iran’s as well.
Yeah, sorry. I think things thru.
Iran has lots of ballistic missiles, conducts war through proxies (terrorist militias), has access to the saudi fields via the south, and the ability to disrupt world oil prices in the gulf. Wants to take over Iraq and Syria and have access to both gulf and Mediterranean. From their they will take the Saudis and the princedoms if the Turks, Saudis, Egyptians and Israelis don’t resist them. So they will have a corridor from the mediterranean to the Caucuses to Afghanistan and the indian ocean.
However, Iran has an antiquated military. And we are far beyond their ability to project power.
And you’re missing the point that global peace is no longer in our domestic interests either strategically or economically.
I hate quoting fiction other than the occasional Herbert, but “Chaos is a Ladder” of opportunity.
We want chaos this year and as much of it as possible.
Revolution comes.
—
Legend:
99th = World Military Rank
Country Name
Population / GDP
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 16:54:00 UTC
-
I DUNNO. NETANYAHU? Charges appear political to me, not criminal. In other words
I DUNNO. NETANYAHU?
Charges appear political to me, not criminal. In other words they’re within the limits access buying, but there isn’t any evidence of quid pro quo.
Same with Trump really.
Compare with Obama giving 150M to a publisher for writing up the education standards, and getting 50M for his book rights from the same publisher on exit.
That’s quid pro quo.
The semblance of, or possibility of influence (corruption) is not the same as the demonstrated evidence of direct or indirect quid pro quo.
Obama shouldn’t have used that publisher. That was quid pro quo. I haven’t seen a single instance of anything of that nature with Trump or Netanyahu.
So the left uses a double standard benefitting their members but not applying the same standard to the opposition’s members.
This double standard within a group is a crime under P-Law.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 10:44:00 UTC
-
MARKETS NOT MAJORITARIANISM by Martin Štěpán Why do people keep assuming we only
MARKETS NOT MAJORITARIANISM
by Martin Štěpán
Why do people keep assuming we only want to make slight changes to universal suffrage? The optimum outcome is scraping the whole thing and putting in several houses for classes with different interests that have to negotiate.
They have been indoctrinated into the fallacy of the good of democracy’s majoritarian tyranny, and made ignorant of the market as a means of calculating optimums despite differences.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-04 12:07:00 UTC
-
“confusing friend and enemy -the current state of the dissident right”—Thorin
—“confusing friend and enemy -the current state of the dissident right”—Thorin Moriaz
There is nothing new about factions on any side, it’s just that the masculine resistance to verbal cooperation (disagreeableness) is higher than the feminine, but the feminine resistance to physical cooperation is higher than the masculine.
We don’t need to agree on words, we only need to agree to fight.
We are men. 😉
At least those who will fight are men. 😉 lol
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-03 12:42:00 UTC