One more time. Three means of human coercion or more gently, weapons of influence. The Physical: Body and Movement Using Force or Violence The fear of harm or promise of defense. By the Dominant or Established Male The Material: Resources and Opportunity Using Bribe or Trade The fear of loss of gains, or promise of gains By the Brother, Ally, or Ascendant Male The Social: Cooperation and Insurance Using Undermining or Advocacy The fear of ostracization or promise of inclusion By the female and especially dominant female Personality: Big5/6 Personality Traits with 10/12 Personality facets. Where One Traits differs Dominance Expression. Where all Facets differ by Gender Bias. Where all personalities cluster by three types: Dominant or Established Male. Ascendant Male. Female. Gender: Where sex is genetically determined and either male or female. Where the brain evolves a dominant lateral, female, associative (wide association in the present) and longitudinal male a narrow, association over time and space). Where the resulting brain structure favors temporal interpersonal emotion in the female necessary for child rearing, and intertemporal political analytic in the male necessary for holding territory, resources, females, and children from capture by competing males. Where sexual preference is for the opposite sex, either male, female, but a small percentage of the population is subject to developmental defect in utero and can express almost any gender distribution. Conflict: Where developmental defect can cause failure to produce sufficient agency for self control. Where genders demonstrate differences in self control by antisocial, disruptive or hostile behavior. Where females demonstrate sexual, psychological(interpersonal), social(group), antisocial behavior, by continuous undermining and manipulation. Where males demonstrate sexual and physical antisocial behavior by continuous harm to self, others, and property.
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Three means of human coercion or more gently, weapons of influence.
One more time. Three means of human coercion or more gently, weapons of influence. The Physical: Body and Movement Using Force or Violence The fear of harm or promise of defense. By the Dominant or Established Male The Material: Resources and Opportunity Using Bribe or Trade The fear of loss of gains, or promise of gains By the Brother, Ally, or Ascendant Male The Social: Cooperation and Insurance Using Undermining or Advocacy The fear of ostracization or promise of inclusion By the female and especially dominant female Personality: Big5/6 Personality Traits with 10/12 Personality facets. Where One Traits differs Dominance Expression. Where all Facets differ by Gender Bias. Where all personalities cluster by three types: Dominant or Established Male. Ascendant Male. Female. Gender: Where sex is genetically determined and either male or female. Where the brain evolves a dominant lateral, female, associative (wide association in the present) and longitudinal male a narrow, association over time and space). Where the resulting brain structure favors temporal interpersonal emotion in the female necessary for child rearing, and intertemporal political analytic in the male necessary for holding territory, resources, females, and children from capture by competing males. Where sexual preference is for the opposite sex, either male, female, but a small percentage of the population is subject to developmental defect in utero and can express almost any gender distribution. Conflict: Where developmental defect can cause failure to produce sufficient agency for self control. Where genders demonstrate differences in self control by antisocial, disruptive or hostile behavior. Where females demonstrate sexual, psychological(interpersonal), social(group), antisocial behavior, by continuous undermining and manipulation. Where males demonstrate sexual and physical antisocial behavior by continuous harm to self, others, and property.
-
The Left and The Right Have Common Interests and The Financial and State Sector
The Left and The Right Have Common Interests and The Financial and State Sector Is Our Mutual Enemy https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/the-left-and-the-right-have-common-interests-and-the-financial-and-state-sector-is-our-mutual-enemy/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 20:42:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232405637914677255
-
The Left and The Right Have Common Interests and The Financial and State Sector Is Our Mutual Enemy
I don’t think the Finance / Media / Academy / State “Cathedral” complex understands: The left and right agree that the finance and state complex is counter to our interests. That’s simply true. Otherwise we just want to sort into heterogeneous consumptive quantity (left), and homogenous conservative quality (right), The totalitarian state is preventing us from achieving our desired means of self determination. Without the federal government’s unconstitutional dominion over the social organization of the states, we could, as did the original colonies, and the many many states of the holy roman empire (german empire’s historical european organization) go our own way, and have diversity of states to suit the diversity of our interests. We aren’t proposing that anyone win the monopoly. We’re proposing the restoration of local control of self determination that is the origin of the constitution, the British empire, the Holy Roman Empire, and all of European history: small homogenous states with different cultures competing for population, production, and trade by the production of different commons. So you know, both left and right win by burning the financial and State sectors at the virtual stake so to speak, and then we return to what we seem to demand: a loosely federated states of european civilization with a material judicial ‘priesthood’ of the constitution, instead of a supernatural religious priesthood of the church. So you know, between the right and the left and the rewards of peaceful life and choice for the center, the only loser of this revolutionary reformation restoring the constitutional structure to its original intent as a federation of states combining arms into a single military for continental defense, and a supreme court to resolve conflicts over property and trade. Between the left in the cities and the right in the ‘red sea’ those who have abused us by financialization will easily pay the price. And propertarianism tells them how.
-
The Left and The Right Have Common Interests and The Financial and State Sector Is Our Mutual Enemy
I don’t think the Finance / Media / Academy / State “Cathedral” complex understands: The left and right agree that the finance and state complex is counter to our interests. That’s simply true. Otherwise we just want to sort into heterogeneous consumptive quantity (left), and homogenous conservative quality (right), The totalitarian state is preventing us from achieving our desired means of self determination. Without the federal government’s unconstitutional dominion over the social organization of the states, we could, as did the original colonies, and the many many states of the holy roman empire (german empire’s historical european organization) go our own way, and have diversity of states to suit the diversity of our interests. We aren’t proposing that anyone win the monopoly. We’re proposing the restoration of local control of self determination that is the origin of the constitution, the British empire, the Holy Roman Empire, and all of European history: small homogenous states with different cultures competing for population, production, and trade by the production of different commons. So you know, both left and right win by burning the financial and State sectors at the virtual stake so to speak, and then we return to what we seem to demand: a loosely federated states of european civilization with a material judicial ‘priesthood’ of the constitution, instead of a supernatural religious priesthood of the church. So you know, between the right and the left and the rewards of peaceful life and choice for the center, the only loser of this revolutionary reformation restoring the constitutional structure to its original intent as a federation of states combining arms into a single military for continental defense, and a supreme court to resolve conflicts over property and trade. Between the left in the cities and the right in the ‘red sea’ those who have abused us by financialization will easily pay the price. And propertarianism tells them how.
-
The Future of Macro City States
The Future of Macro City States https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/the-future-of-macro-city-states/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 20:42:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232405448344702983
-
The Future of Macro City States
by Francesco Principi Love you Curt. Free cities have always represented the enemy of the tyrant state. Within a few years, world politics will be dominated by macro-cities – the influential megacities. And they are so connected to each other that they no longer have to bend to the concept of state and border. City-states are efficient on the model of the old ones: therefore not necessarily independent but with an autonomy such as to be able to engage in global relationships from which the surrounding area will benefit. I am sure this is the future. CD: Of course, although my understanding is that these macro states will crash with the bottom, and that the middle will escape them. So I just see a future of city-ghettos, and suburban and rural manor-states. In other words, the current wealth of cities is due to population migration made possible by financialization that was only sustainable until the end of the 20th century.
-
The Future of Macro City States
by Francesco Principi Love you Curt. Free cities have always represented the enemy of the tyrant state. Within a few years, world politics will be dominated by macro-cities – the influential megacities. And they are so connected to each other that they no longer have to bend to the concept of state and border. City-states are efficient on the model of the old ones: therefore not necessarily independent but with an autonomy such as to be able to engage in global relationships from which the surrounding area will benefit. I am sure this is the future. CD: Of course, although my understanding is that these macro states will crash with the bottom, and that the middle will escape them. So I just see a future of city-ghettos, and suburban and rural manor-states. In other words, the current wealth of cities is due to population migration made possible by financialization that was only sustainable until the end of the 20th century.
-
There will be no United States without Adapting to it
There will be no United States without Adapting to it. https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/there-will-be-no-united-states-without-adapting-to-it/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 20:40:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232405101668708354
-
What have you done to be worthy of leaders you seek?
“We need leadership!”— The Right
“What have you done to be worthy of leaders?”