Feb 7, 2020, 12:10 PM The qualities of a king (christian monarch to be precise) have to do with the entire family, not the king himself. And great kings are not what we’re looking for. That’s a via-positiva. We’re looking for constitutional monarchs that handle exceptions and prevent usurpation of power, not those who govern. Rule of Law Monarchy (Strictly Constructed Natural Law) … Constitutional Monarchy (Traditional Articulated Rights law) … … Christian Monarch (Church Sanctioned Customary Law) … … … King ( Private Property Traditional Customary European Law ) … … … … Imperial Tzar (Military Arbitrary Ruler – Post Mongol Russia ) … … … … … Imperial Caesar (Military Arbitrary Ruler – Pagan Europe) … … … … … … State Dictator – (Military Arbitrary Ruler)
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
A Little Context for When I Use “monarchy”
Feb 7, 2020, 12:10 PM The qualities of a king (christian monarch to be precise) have to do with the entire family, not the king himself. And great kings are not what we’re looking for. That’s a via-positiva. We’re looking for constitutional monarchs that handle exceptions and prevent usurpation of power, not those who govern. Rule of Law Monarchy (Strictly Constructed Natural Law) … Constitutional Monarchy (Traditional Articulated Rights law) … … Christian Monarch (Church Sanctioned Customary Law) … … … King ( Private Property Traditional Customary European Law ) … … … … Imperial Tzar (Military Arbitrary Ruler – Post Mongol Russia ) … … … … … Imperial Caesar (Military Arbitrary Ruler – Pagan Europe) … … … … … … State Dictator – (Military Arbitrary Ruler)
-
Pay People to Accelerate the Big Sort at The Cost of The State, Academy, Finance, Entertainment Industries
Feb 7, 2020, 2:56 PM I (we) hold the position that (a) we should be pursuing rights to self determination, and our way of life, and that requires arms just as others require faith. (b) We are tolerant of those that conform to our traditional group strategy, and are inclusive within that limit, but that integration on a scale of other than middle and upper middle class christians (Black, Hispanic, Asian) has failed, and that we will not leave a window open for repeating the failures of the 20th. Our strategy evolves. My strategy at present is to push rights. Move to the center on those rights, but be intolerant regarding policy and rights, which will drive our better people to us, and cause separation on demand for commons that will happen to be those preferred by our people. My understanding from the historical evidence everywhere is that if we create a separate union on our terms, then the best will depart leaving the blue cities ghettos with an elite that exploits them but cannot exploit the middle, and that new cities will replace the commercial them. As I’ve said, by merely emptying DC as a power center, and gutting new york as a financial center, and disemboweling the media’s income stream, we will achieve our goals. The reason this will work is that we are going to buy off left right and center middle with the returns on redistributing all that wealth. So to repeat the strategy for those that aren’t on board with it, we offer a deal that is full of desirable ideas and then turn the population against the real enemy. At that point they will double down like all humans and give us moral license to us both left and right activists and ‘divide the spoils’.
-
Pay People to Accelerate the Big Sort at The Cost of The State, Academy, Finance, Entertainment Industries
Feb 7, 2020, 2:56 PM I (we) hold the position that (a) we should be pursuing rights to self determination, and our way of life, and that requires arms just as others require faith. (b) We are tolerant of those that conform to our traditional group strategy, and are inclusive within that limit, but that integration on a scale of other than middle and upper middle class christians (Black, Hispanic, Asian) has failed, and that we will not leave a window open for repeating the failures of the 20th. Our strategy evolves. My strategy at present is to push rights. Move to the center on those rights, but be intolerant regarding policy and rights, which will drive our better people to us, and cause separation on demand for commons that will happen to be those preferred by our people. My understanding from the historical evidence everywhere is that if we create a separate union on our terms, then the best will depart leaving the blue cities ghettos with an elite that exploits them but cannot exploit the middle, and that new cities will replace the commercial them. As I’ve said, by merely emptying DC as a power center, and gutting new york as a financial center, and disemboweling the media’s income stream, we will achieve our goals. The reason this will work is that we are going to buy off left right and center middle with the returns on redistributing all that wealth. So to repeat the strategy for those that aren’t on board with it, we offer a deal that is full of desirable ideas and then turn the population against the real enemy. At that point they will double down like all humans and give us moral license to us both left and right activists and ‘divide the spoils’.
-
They Don’t Want Our Rule
Feb 7, 2020, 7:46 PM
They want proximity to us but they don’t want our rule. Well, great, we don’t want to rule them, but we won’t tolerate their rule either.
-
They Don’t Want Our Rule
Feb 7, 2020, 7:46 PM
They want proximity to us but they don’t want our rule. Well, great, we don’t want to rule them, but we won’t tolerate their rule either.
-
Testimony
Feb 8, 2020, 9:39 AM
—“Lots of pro-boogaloo folks and others are looking for solutions. It starts with being pro-second Amendment. Then they identify the enemy.. Then they start looking for Solutions. Only Propertarianism actually offers solutions. For the price that is going to be paid for a chance to fix this wreck, it had better work.”—Rick Tavi
-
Testimony
Feb 8, 2020, 9:39 AM
—“Lots of pro-boogaloo folks and others are looking for solutions. It starts with being pro-second Amendment. Then they identify the enemy.. Then they start looking for Solutions. Only Propertarianism actually offers solutions. For the price that is going to be paid for a chance to fix this wreck, it had better work.”—Rick Tavi
-
“THE OVERTON WINDOW IS TAKING ABUSE”
Feb 8, 2020, 9:42 AM by Brandon Hayes Curt: The Overton window is taking abuse. We push on it from the inside so it expands. There are also people on both fringes pulling the edges of discourse from the outside. We’re breaking the window frame; and we ought to. Discourse is all acceptable; it’s certain action that isn’t. So, we’re crushing a concept. As the window opens more perspective frames break. I’ve been attempting to frame the conversation around the edges so previous frames of for sense-making that offered clarity become obsolete. (Say capitalism/socialism… the frame is false; we’re forcing the issue). Your timeline has always been money from what I could tell. The future has events that provide clarity/turning points. (2020 election for instance) At this point anything that alters the emotional underlay of the populace suites us because emotional breakdowns are perspective altering. The detractors, those that look to minimize emotional fluctuations only work to create emotional fragility and unstable frames (as they are emotionally based). [All chaos suites those that can reinstitute order. We’re the only ones offering anything fair] No one can survive sanely inside themselves searching for happiness. The recent JBP breakdown proves the solid open individualist frame [the one JBP purports as paramount] doesn’t hold up under pressure to change the whole world. It crumbles and falls apart because it’s more than anyone can do. See I believe it’s ok to need others. It’s necessary. I’ve been lucky to have those I can lean and depend on. I have been blessed with those I can trust. And now I have a system to vet everyone and can teach it to everyone else. (Thank you) We’re winning and people join winning teams. It’s a matter of getting them to put their money where their mouth is. And since money is abundant and it’s time that’s scarce; they have every reason.
-
“THE OVERTON WINDOW IS TAKING ABUSE”
Feb 8, 2020, 9:42 AM by Brandon Hayes Curt: The Overton window is taking abuse. We push on it from the inside so it expands. There are also people on both fringes pulling the edges of discourse from the outside. We’re breaking the window frame; and we ought to. Discourse is all acceptable; it’s certain action that isn’t. So, we’re crushing a concept. As the window opens more perspective frames break. I’ve been attempting to frame the conversation around the edges so previous frames of for sense-making that offered clarity become obsolete. (Say capitalism/socialism… the frame is false; we’re forcing the issue). Your timeline has always been money from what I could tell. The future has events that provide clarity/turning points. (2020 election for instance) At this point anything that alters the emotional underlay of the populace suites us because emotional breakdowns are perspective altering. The detractors, those that look to minimize emotional fluctuations only work to create emotional fragility and unstable frames (as they are emotionally based). [All chaos suites those that can reinstitute order. We’re the only ones offering anything fair] No one can survive sanely inside themselves searching for happiness. The recent JBP breakdown proves the solid open individualist frame [the one JBP purports as paramount] doesn’t hold up under pressure to change the whole world. It crumbles and falls apart because it’s more than anyone can do. See I believe it’s ok to need others. It’s necessary. I’ve been lucky to have those I can lean and depend on. I have been blessed with those I can trust. And now I have a system to vet everyone and can teach it to everyone else. (Thank you) We’re winning and people join winning teams. It’s a matter of getting them to put their money where their mouth is. And since money is abundant and it’s time that’s scarce; they have every reason.