Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • “I love the smell of bloody revolution in the morning”– At least that’s the fut

    –“I love the smell of bloody revolution in the morning”–

    At least that’s the future turn of phrase….

    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-31 21:08:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796649922202091976

  • No. And having worked in that world a bit I find both the idea and the right win

    No. And having worked in that world a bit I find both the idea and the right wing’s search for conspiracy where there is just logical incentive rather silly. He’s a centrist to center leftist and he’s been consistent.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-31 20:56:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796647049657504148

    Reply addressees: @AWKleinheksel @PeterZeihan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796639750712930681

  • RT @Geiger_Capital: The first felony conviction of a former US President wasn’t

    RT @Geiger_Capital: The first felony conviction of a former US President wasn’t for the Iraq or Afghanistan wars, illegal CIA coups, drone…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-31 14:52:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796555395676459467

  • Unlikely. They assisted us against the taliban. That was enough of a reason

    Unlikely. They assisted us against the taliban. That was enough of a reason.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-31 05:13:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796409729318789607

    Reply addressees: @ToujoursFidale @TheHammurabi

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796408688288411809

  • “Q: What did the US achieve in invading Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Libya?”– S

    –“Q: What did the US achieve in invading Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Libya?”–

    Suppression of the funding of terrorism – which is a means of warfare. The fact that he middle east is a low trust low competency civilization not capable of producing the trust and trustworhty behavior necessary to produce sale organizations of social, economic, political, and strategic success, and therefore has to resort to terrorism, which these untrusting and untrustworthy and demonstrably incompetent people demonstrate, is no different from the conduct of war.

    So these countries warred by either aggressive conquest (Iraq) repetition of aggression (Iraq), fostered terrorism (Afghanistan and Libya – for some reason Pakistan get’s a pass), or constraining the principle financier of terrorism in the world, Iran, and it’s efforts to destabilize the region (syria), and Iranian participation in the collapse of the only mertious country in the middle east (Lebanon), by taking advantage of lebanese tolerance for islamic activism.

    There are three bad actors left in the word: Iran, Russia, and China. They are the remaining countries that seek to restore the age of empires and reverse the western innovation of the production of the sovereign nation states defended by federations around a core state.

    These revisionists seeking to restore empires where the elites can prey upon the people (because that’s what all three countries do).

    The anglo-american mistake was not letting Macarthur in China and Patton in Russia end both empires permanently, which let them attempt to capture Iran, which in turn we placed the Shah, who was then overthrown by these primitive barbarians that are a threat to the Iranian people, their neighbors and the peace and prosperity of the world.

    No more empires
    No more world wars
    No more subject peoples.
    Everyone carries their own weight.
    Everyone free, engaged in peaceful trade, and the production of goods, services, information and commons for the people.

    No more immorality making excuses for primitivism.

    (BTW: I notice you didn’t mention the USA saving of muslims in europe when slavic europeans and in particular russians sought to exterminate the muslims in the balkans.)

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @TheHammurabi

    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-31 03:20:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796381247641403393

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796377464912167057

  • “World View” is not an opinion. It’s a fact. Sorry. Criminals always make excuse

    “World View” is not an opinion. It’s a fact. Sorry. Criminals always make excuses for their behavior. People who do not stop criminals always make excuses for their behavior. But the universe, and the world do not make excuses for such behavior. The only natural law that produces peace and prosperity is ‘self determination by self determined means, by reciprocal defense of sovereignty in demostrated assets, and reciprocity in display word and deed.
    Sorry. That’s just evolution. We just stop people from violating that law. And we are the first people to do so since the romans.

    Reply addressees: @TheHammurabi

    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-31 03:06:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796377808601554944

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796360667374706699

  • No, once again you’ve created the means by which everyone else can do the same.

    No, once again you’ve created the means by which everyone else can do the same. The only reason jews thrive in the west is that we don’t suppress their criminal behavior (as thoroughly as do the muslims). And as we’ve demonstrated, it’s not difficult to do so.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-31 01:01:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796346199177314557

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @TheHammurabi

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796338606090698771

  • Q: WHAT ABOUT THE MORALITY OF US MILITARY ACTION AND EVEN INVASION? For what rea

    Q: WHAT ABOUT THE MORALITY OF US MILITARY ACTION AND EVEN INVASION?
    For what reason did the US invade the countries it invaded? I’ve answered this question a few hundred times.

    What immorality, injustice, aggression, violence, or war has caused the US to conduct a policing action against any country? List them all. Go ahead.

    They are always policing actions for the simple reason that we DON’T want to conquer and rule others. We only want to create prosperity and human rights by preventing others from conquest and rule of others.

    My only criticism of US and NATO postwar policy is that we tell people we’re prohibiting the production of empires that have been the source of thousands of years of human war poverty and suffering, and promoting national sovereignty, democracy, economic prosperity, and human rights.

    But we don’t tell people that if you allow a government of your people to aggress against you or especially against others, the that violates those principles under which we protect world prosperity trade, finance, and law, which has made the world wealthier and more secure and more healthy than ever before, and more so than mankind ever dreamed possible.

    So if you as a people violate those principles necessary for the prosperity of humanity in industrial and technological modernity, that not only will your government pay, but your people will pay for tolerating such a government.

    No excuses. Because the consequences are too great. And it is that statement of the carrot of prosperity but the failure to state the stick of punishment that allows for the misrepresentation of the purpose.

    You may not be a moral enough person, family, clan, tribe, nation, religion, and civilization to try to advance humanity even if only out of self defense against those who would use aggression rather than cooperation – but europeans, or at least anglo and germanic europeans are so.

    And that is the greatest moral ambition available to mankind.

    Even if, for some reason, we have tolerated the evils of Jewish parasitic financialism and jewish seditious leftism, to capture western education, academy, media, and government, to spread degenerate incentive for destructive anti-social, ant-familial, anti-national hedonism that under democracy is advanced by women, who are the most hedonistic and consumptive creatures evolution and the gods have ever made.

    We can however stop that. And you an help us stop that. But it’s not by the primitive means that the countries we have taken military policing action against.

    Affections for you and all mankind.
    CD

    Reply addressees: @TheHammurabi

    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-30 23:22:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796321385905557504

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796314326640497026

  • correct. and we are not necessarily weak so much as we have a tragic weakness, c

    correct. and we are not necessarily weak so much as we have a tragic weakness, christian tolerance combined with postwar jewish capture of institutions, plus a body of women easily sold their ‘nonsense’.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-30 04:31:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796036775434977460

    Reply addressees: @BanninYaqoobi

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796004107167105484

  • The feeling at the time has little impact on the understanding over time. I have

    The feeling at the time has little impact on the understanding over time.
    I have three opinions.
    1. First, everyone wants the Palestinians to ‘go away’ because no one wants them or they’d take them in. They have their opportunity to create a viable polity and they don’t – instead they live on various international charities, and entertaining themselves with terrorism. While it’s one thing to fight and use terror it’s another to use islamic brutality. And Palestinians show no interests in doing otherwise. Israel must occupy both territories and end the threat or between reproductive differences and costs of producing a jew vs an arab mean Israel, especially with the large number of fundamentalist ‘parasites’ on the rest of the population, mean israel is unsustainable. As such I see Israel continuing until the west bank at least is under full control and settlement driving out the Palestinians. I can see them allowing the gaza strip. I see the USA continuing to wait out russia, iran, and china. I see israel giving the USA cause for attacking Iran. The USA won’t do that until israel gives it no choice.
    2. Second, strategically it is valuable to maintain Israel as the only high tech economy, with a strong education system, and a good government in the region. This is akin to china being threatened by a democratic hong kong and Taiwan, to Russia being threatened by a democratic Ukraine, and Iran being threatened by a democratic and successful Israel – because their success brings into question the legitimacy of the governments of China, Russia, and Iran for their populations.
    3. Third, by and large, the world hates the jews like the Palestinians and the Jews hate each other. So no one wants the jews or the Palestinians. In fact, most countries would love it if they could deport Jews to Israel without fear of international demonization. So, I don’t expect anyone to allow the collapse of Israel for the simple reason that it’s both strategically valuable and no one wants them to move elsewhere.

    Reply addressees: @hyperlambda

    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 22:30:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795945805607505921

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795942346766553135