Curt Doolittle

Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • Q: Where Do You Stand on Imperialism

    Feb 2, 2020, 10:49 AM

    —-“Where do you stand on imperialism?”—

    I stand as always on empirical evidence and operational possibility. Depends on what we define as imperial. The holy roman empire or the han chinese empire, or the roman empire or the middle eastern empires? DIMENSION ONE – HOMOGENEITY VS HETEROGENEITY The holy roman (german continental) was homogenous; the chinese made theirs homogenous through slow forcible integration; the roman empire failed when insufficiently homogenous; the greek empire never could consilidate becasue it was heterogeneous; and the middle eastern empires were pretty totalitarian and continuously in termoil because they existed to resist heterogeneity. Now what about an empire of rule of law over teh english speaking or germanic speaking peoples? Well that is just a federation with a judge of last resort between that resolves differences between the princes (monarchs) of different poliites. What about an empire of rule by degree over a forcibly integrated and relatively homogenous empire of limited mobility like china? Well, that is just a way to manage primitive people by bureaucratic corporatism and corporate accountability(via positiva) rather than european sovereignty and rule of law (via negativa). What about the roman empire under roman law? Well, that is a way of suppressing parasitism and facilitating trade so that the upper classes can profit and the lower classes live better than they would otherwise. What about the middle eastern empires? Well that is little more than preventing any of the other tribes from rising up and profiting at the expense of the suppressed tribes. DIMENSION TWO – RULE VS REPLACEMENT Now, let’s ask about conquest and rule (europe); vs conquest, colonization and rule (africa); vs conquest, colonization, and integration; vs conquest, colonization and replacement? (Americas). DIMENSION THREE – INCENTIVES And whether you’re doing so in defense or for assets or for taxation and plunder. ANSWER We can make a table of what works and does’t work. 

    .................Homogenous <-----------Limited-----> Heterogeneous
Rule
|................Yes.......................No....................No
|................Yes.......................Yes...................No
|................N/A.......................Yes...................Yes
v
Replacement

    And we can make a simple statement out of incentives.

    Defense : Yes regardless Markets : Yes and integrate Assets:….Yes and only if you Rule Plunder:…No … only to raid to conquer. malincentives build. So that is my answer on Imperialism.

    Homogeneous populations only. Rule only in exchange for returns. Exploit only to further replacement. Conquest and Genocide are the most consequential and successful entrepreneurial ventures in human history.

  • China’s Fascism Shows Its Ends

    China’s Fascism Shows Its Ends https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/chinas-fascism-shows-its-ends/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 20:36:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264656442893746182

  • China’s Fascism Shows Its Ends

    Feb 2, 2020, 11:14 AM China’s Response to disaster vs America’s: This is the value of a Fascist State (Where fascist means Ethnonationalist, Authoritarian, State Capitalist, Mandatory Conformist.) And people prefer it. China demonstrated that Fascism won the 20th. Heterogeneous Immigration demonstrated that Democracy lost the 20th.

    — REGARDING THIS ARTICLE FROM CHINA—- Huoshenshan Hospital has been completed in #Wuhan on Sunday. Only 10 days to build. 4,000+ workers. 1000s of equipment. days and nights of work. 34,000-square-meter. 1000 beds available on Monday. —-END—

    —“Fascism isn’t state capitalist. it doesn’t take sides on economics, it applies pressure on markets as the situation demands. If you want to read anything about Fascist Economics, I’d recommend, The Economic Foundations of Fascism by Paul Enzig And Hitler’s Revolution by R. Tedor”– A ( Intelligent and Informed) Friend

    Hitler wasn’t the only fascist – he was just the last. So yes, the state:

    (a) prevents contra-autarkic arbitrage for profit and exploitation of state resources (the same thing); (b) biases production to commons by use of state financing; (c) overrides market incentives when needed. So we can fuss around with terms. But the bias in private capitalism is non interference in markets except by treating the state as just another customer, while state capitalism places higher priority on state as a customer than the market – particularly international market.

    —“A fascist wouldn’t consider the state as anything as reductive as a customer. Or anything of the sort. The state is the arbiter of the people, it IS the people. “All within the state, Nothing outside the State, Nothing against the State” the state comes before all else.”—Hauptgefreitersiege @Hauptgefreiter1

    This is a secular theological, or philosophical, rather than scientific or operational description. I understand the “strange’ continental obsession with restoring the theology of the church with some secular theology – from Rousseau to Kant to Marx to present – Europe is ‘stuck’. But this point of view is one of an anglo who descends from the minor aristocracy, and the puritanical, empirical, common law tradition. We can understand the continent but the continent cannot understand us. We escaped even secular theology – I just don’t know if it was good. Hugs brother. Thanks for letting me riff on your comment.

  • China’s Fascism Shows Its Ends

    Feb 2, 2020, 11:14 AM China’s Response to disaster vs America’s: This is the value of a Fascist State (Where fascist means Ethnonationalist, Authoritarian, State Capitalist, Mandatory Conformist.) And people prefer it. China demonstrated that Fascism won the 20th. Heterogeneous Immigration demonstrated that Democracy lost the 20th.

    — REGARDING THIS ARTICLE FROM CHINA—- Huoshenshan Hospital has been completed in #Wuhan on Sunday. Only 10 days to build. 4,000+ workers. 1000s of equipment. days and nights of work. 34,000-square-meter. 1000 beds available on Monday. —-END—

    —“Fascism isn’t state capitalist. it doesn’t take sides on economics, it applies pressure on markets as the situation demands. If you want to read anything about Fascist Economics, I’d recommend, The Economic Foundations of Fascism by Paul Enzig And Hitler’s Revolution by R. Tedor”– A ( Intelligent and Informed) Friend

    Hitler wasn’t the only fascist – he was just the last. So yes, the state:

    (a) prevents contra-autarkic arbitrage for profit and exploitation of state resources (the same thing); (b) biases production to commons by use of state financing; (c) overrides market incentives when needed. So we can fuss around with terms. But the bias in private capitalism is non interference in markets except by treating the state as just another customer, while state capitalism places higher priority on state as a customer than the market – particularly international market.

    —“A fascist wouldn’t consider the state as anything as reductive as a customer. Or anything of the sort. The state is the arbiter of the people, it IS the people. “All within the state, Nothing outside the State, Nothing against the State” the state comes before all else.”—Hauptgefreitersiege @Hauptgefreiter1

    This is a secular theological, or philosophical, rather than scientific or operational description. I understand the “strange’ continental obsession with restoring the theology of the church with some secular theology – from Rousseau to Kant to Marx to present – Europe is ‘stuck’. But this point of view is one of an anglo who descends from the minor aristocracy, and the puritanical, empirical, common law tradition. We can understand the continent but the continent cannot understand us. We escaped even secular theology – I just don’t know if it was good. Hugs brother. Thanks for letting me riff on your comment.

  • The Retreat and Regroup Strategy

    The Retreat and Regroup Strategy https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/the-retreat-and-regroup-strategy/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 20:28:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264654404256436224

  • The Retreat and Regroup Strategy

    Feb 2, 2020, 6:58 PM by Jake Anders Gotbanned I’m going to start by saying I do not advocate violence and I myself am not planning on doing so . That being said we are already a minority amongst gen z and we have millions of legal and illegal immigrants poring over our borders every year. We will never win by voting and the people that can be red pulled already are . What we have to do now is move into the areas that are already white dominated and start electing our own people Curt Doolittle would be a good choice. It’s perfectly legal and nothing they can legally do about it. Obviously this will spur on some kind of conflict but we stand a chance at winning if we have governance over our own cities towns states etc. We will have state money and weapons. The problem with the proper who dreams of civil war is the fact that he is all by himself. Training by yourself is better than nothing at all but not much if you don’t have a team of men who are also trained with you then you don’t stand a chance at all if the unfortunate event of civil war did happen. You need to be meeting irl not just for prepper shoot em up tactics but building businesses with each other starting homesteading growing your own food there is an estimated 40 million of white nationalist in America think of what we can do if we all moved to the Pacific northwest and apalachicola mountains region and had our small little tightknit tribes who were self sufficient? And all of this can be done in small steps and its perfectly legal look into harold Covington of north west front and shield wall balkanization seems to be the only way forward and again I’m not advocating violence etc I’m advocating preparing for the possibility of violence being done to us

  • The Retreat and Regroup Strategy

    Feb 2, 2020, 6:58 PM by Jake Anders Gotbanned I’m going to start by saying I do not advocate violence and I myself am not planning on doing so . That being said we are already a minority amongst gen z and we have millions of legal and illegal immigrants poring over our borders every year. We will never win by voting and the people that can be red pulled already are . What we have to do now is move into the areas that are already white dominated and start electing our own people Curt Doolittle would be a good choice. It’s perfectly legal and nothing they can legally do about it. Obviously this will spur on some kind of conflict but we stand a chance at winning if we have governance over our own cities towns states etc. We will have state money and weapons. The problem with the proper who dreams of civil war is the fact that he is all by himself. Training by yourself is better than nothing at all but not much if you don’t have a team of men who are also trained with you then you don’t stand a chance at all if the unfortunate event of civil war did happen. You need to be meeting irl not just for prepper shoot em up tactics but building businesses with each other starting homesteading growing your own food there is an estimated 40 million of white nationalist in America think of what we can do if we all moved to the Pacific northwest and apalachicola mountains region and had our small little tightknit tribes who were self sufficient? And all of this can be done in small steps and its perfectly legal look into harold Covington of north west front and shield wall balkanization seems to be the only way forward and again I’m not advocating violence etc I’m advocating preparing for the possibility of violence being done to us

  • No you aren’t going to take away our guns. 😉

    No you aren’t going to take away our guns. 😉 https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/no-you-arent-going-to-take-away-our-guns/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 20:27:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264654307405824000

  • No you aren’t going to take away our guns. 😉

    Feb 2, 2020, 7:00 PM

    —“Time to TAKE AWAY your fucking guns”—(((Gamhard McCoy)))

    It’s time to take away your citizenship, benefits, rights to property, free speech, and add 30% taxation above and beyond. Which one of those options do you think is more likely? 😉 Gonna happen this year. End Birthright Citizenship. End Migration Citizenship. Roll immigration back to pre 65 act. End all H1B, and all Non-European academic visitation. Require economic means of ongoing support Revoke citizenship to 65 Immigration Act Revoke citizenship for any and all individuals and their familes who have voted for, promoted, written raised money, written legislation for, violation of the constitution. Exit of miltiary, state, federal employment, and political positions of those people and their families. Monopolize military, state, federal employment, and political positions by pre-65. Forcible repatriation of all post 90′ immigrants. All will happen this year or next. Why? And it isn’t even hard.

  • No you aren’t going to take away our guns. 😉

    Feb 2, 2020, 7:00 PM

    —“Time to TAKE AWAY your fucking guns”—(((Gamhard McCoy)))

    It’s time to take away your citizenship, benefits, rights to property, free speech, and add 30% taxation above and beyond. Which one of those options do you think is more likely? 😉 Gonna happen this year. End Birthright Citizenship. End Migration Citizenship. Roll immigration back to pre 65 act. End all H1B, and all Non-European academic visitation. Require economic means of ongoing support Revoke citizenship to 65 Immigration Act Revoke citizenship for any and all individuals and their familes who have voted for, promoted, written raised money, written legislation for, violation of the constitution. Exit of miltiary, state, federal employment, and political positions of those people and their families. Monopolize military, state, federal employment, and political positions by pre-65. Forcible repatriation of all post 90′ immigrants. All will happen this year or next. Why? And it isn’t even hard.