The Point of Demarcation Is Individual vs Political https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/the-point-of-demarcation-is-individual-vs-political-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 04:00:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265855489742692352
Apr 22, 2020, 2:15 PM There are good people in every group. There are bad people in every group. What matters is whether the good or the bad people in every group advance their, and their group’s interest to integrate into our natural law – or whether they resist integration in to our Natural law; or use resistance movements to seek bribes to conform to our natural law; or seek parasitism by taking advantage of our vulnerability – our tolerance – under our natural law. Our Natural Law is empirical and it tells us we aren’t intolerant enough. If it’s interpersonal then exhaust tolerance (christianity). If it’s political then zero tolerance (Doolittle). It’s not a difficult disambiguation, demarcation, distinction, difference. 😉 Be intolerant. Otherwise you’re committing fraud by not paying to cost of maintaining the commons, under pretense your convenience is a conviction. It’s not. It’s fraud. Be intolerant.
Apr 22, 2020, 2:15 PM There are good people in every group. There are bad people in every group. What matters is whether the good or the bad people in every group advance their, and their group’s interest to integrate into our natural law – or whether they resist integration in to our Natural law; or use resistance movements to seek bribes to conform to our natural law; or seek parasitism by taking advantage of our vulnerability – our tolerance – under our natural law. Our Natural Law is empirical and it tells us we aren’t intolerant enough. If it’s interpersonal then exhaust tolerance (christianity). If it’s political then zero tolerance (Doolittle). It’s not a difficult disambiguation, demarcation, distinction, difference. 😉 Be intolerant. Otherwise you’re committing fraud by not paying to cost of maintaining the commons, under pretense your convenience is a conviction. It’s not. It’s fraud. Be intolerant.
Military as Source of Our Strategy vs Being Undermined to Destroy Our Strategy https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/military-as-source-of-our-strategy-vs-being-undermined-to-destroy-our-strategy/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 04:00:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265855324134821889
May 5, 2020, 11:01 AM by Alex Hill 1.) 4GW makes support personnel primary targets. In fact, that’s the entire basis of it. Militias need to have as much self sufficiency and as little logistical needs as possible. The regular military is bogged down as soon as insurgents lay IEDs aimed at logistics convoys. 2.) a militia is not regular military. We can’t afford dedicated specialization in the same fashion as the regular military’s MOS system. Everyone has to be generally skilled much in the same was a Green Beret ODA team works with specific team roles. This also echoes the urban specialized labor versus the rural generalized labor divide. 3.) there is a direct correlation between the rise of feminism and the rise of women in the military, and the military has repeatedly been used as a social experiment because of its top-down nature. Then they’ll want to be able to exercise political suffrage because of service, which then jeopardizes the polity with the politics of Feels. That would be repeating the same mistakes we’ve made and I won’t have any of it.
May 5, 2020, 11:01 AM by Alex Hill 1.) 4GW makes support personnel primary targets. In fact, that’s the entire basis of it. Militias need to have as much self sufficiency and as little logistical needs as possible. The regular military is bogged down as soon as insurgents lay IEDs aimed at logistics convoys. 2.) a militia is not regular military. We can’t afford dedicated specialization in the same fashion as the regular military’s MOS system. Everyone has to be generally skilled much in the same was a Green Beret ODA team works with specific team roles. This also echoes the urban specialized labor versus the rural generalized labor divide. 3.) there is a direct correlation between the rise of feminism and the rise of women in the military, and the military has repeatedly been used as a social experiment because of its top-down nature. Then they’ll want to be able to exercise political suffrage because of service, which then jeopardizes the polity with the politics of Feels. That would be repeating the same mistakes we’ve made and I won’t have any of it.
May 6, 2020, 11:24 AM
—“Plain language that we can all agree on.”—Stephen Wells
I’ve been consistent in my position. (a) I don’t practice equality even among my kinfolk – I practice loyalty and noblesse oblige. (b) researchers in the sciences produce research. activists gain status followers and influence by distributing it. I manufacture intellectual weaponry. it’s “your” (collective) job to figure out how to use it. 😉 (c) this ensures you are leaders and we distribute leadership rather than making me the center of anything at all. I manufacture goods that leaders will use. It’s a natural selection process. And if you can use P you pass. 😉 Now go out and lead. === OR By Noah J Revoy === You don’t have to agree. – Lead if you can understand, agree and can create. – Follow if you can understand and agree. – Or else get out of the way.
May 6, 2020, 11:24 AM
—“Plain language that we can all agree on.”—Stephen Wells
I’ve been consistent in my position. (a) I don’t practice equality even among my kinfolk – I practice loyalty and noblesse oblige. (b) researchers in the sciences produce research. activists gain status followers and influence by distributing it. I manufacture intellectual weaponry. it’s “your” (collective) job to figure out how to use it. 😉 (c) this ensures you are leaders and we distribute leadership rather than making me the center of anything at all. I manufacture goods that leaders will use. It’s a natural selection process. And if you can use P you pass. 😉 Now go out and lead. === OR By Noah J Revoy === You don’t have to agree. – Lead if you can understand, agree and can create. – Follow if you can understand and agree. – Or else get out of the way.
Monarchy as “Everything of Last Resort” https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/monarchy-as-everything-of-last-resort/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:43:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265851284042797056
May 8, 2020, 10:22 AM
2 Above the law (technically she ‘is’ the law.) … 1. No permission: including no license, no passport, no tax. … 2. immunity from inquiry(including Information requests) … 3. immunity from prosecution … 4. immunity from liability … 5. issue passports and pardons 3 – Above Government … 1. Appointment (Confirmation) of Prime Minister (veto) … 2. Appointment of (Confirmation of) Ministers (veto) … 3. Opening and Dismissal of Parliament (Rescinded, we restore) … 4. Appoint Lords 4 – Above The Church … 1. supreme governor of the established Church of England. 5 – Above Status … 1. Appoint Knights, Create knightly orders, … 2. Bestow Honors. … 3. Take Ownership of Chosen Excellence (She owns all the swans in the River Thames and Dolphins in the Sea.) 6 – Above the Civilization (Empire): Queen of the English Speaking Peoples … 1. Queen of Britain … 2. She’s also the Queen of Australia. … 3. Apart from being the Head of State of UK and Australia, she’s also dominion to all these commonwealth realms: Antigua and Barbuda, the Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Canada, Grenada, Jamaica, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Solomon Islands, and Tuvalu. THE BIGGEST MISTAKE IN HISTORY 7. Above Finance … 1. Ownership of the bank of England and the Treasury. or for that matter, the bank of our civilization.. … 2. Insurer of last resort. AND 1. The parliament should have been limited to contracts of the commons.