Conflict: It’s Impossible to Resolve. Eugenic Meritocratic and Adaptive vs Dysgenic Equalitarian and Static https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/conflict-its-impossible-to-resolve-eugenic-meritocratic-and-adaptive-vs-dysgenic-equalitarian-and-static/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 15:27:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266753164482617344
Jan 29, 2020, 10:42 AM For my followers: The P-constitution provides MATERIAL REWARDS at the cost of the media, financial, and political (unaccountable) sectors that have industrialized rent-seeking and baiting-into-hazard in the 20th century. It ALSO provides status – what Reactionaries really desire. Propaganda, pseudoscience, philo-sophism, and religion can all make people aware of opportunity for gain and provide(moral) justification for seizing it. But people seek to acquire:experience, consumption, capital, associations, status – and so political action requires rewards. Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood). What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both. All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood. The end of the agrarian period also is an end to the agrarian economic,social, political, and military order. The europeans re-united the world and (unfortunately) the races and civilizations while still under the agrarian order. And we no longer have common interests we had under agrarianism. And everything is up for grabs. So we see market demand for re-speciation. And the only way to solve it is to once again, separate and continue to speciate – reversing the promise of the one world order the female, semitic, authoritarian mind seems to desire.
Jan 29, 2020, 10:42 AM For my followers: The P-constitution provides MATERIAL REWARDS at the cost of the media, financial, and political (unaccountable) sectors that have industrialized rent-seeking and baiting-into-hazard in the 20th century. It ALSO provides status – what Reactionaries really desire. Propaganda, pseudoscience, philo-sophism, and religion can all make people aware of opportunity for gain and provide(moral) justification for seizing it. But people seek to acquire:experience, consumption, capital, associations, status – and so political action requires rewards. Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood). What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both. All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood. The end of the agrarian period also is an end to the agrarian economic,social, political, and military order. The europeans re-united the world and (unfortunately) the races and civilizations while still under the agrarian order. And we no longer have common interests we had under agrarianism. And everything is up for grabs. So we see market demand for re-speciation. And the only way to solve it is to once again, separate and continue to speciate – reversing the promise of the one world order the female, semitic, authoritarian mind seems to desire.
Peace Is Just War by Non-Military Means. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/peace-is-just-war-by-non-military-means/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 15:02:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266746898632904705
Jan 29, 2020, 8:17 PM We are always at war. Evolution is warfare. Politics and economics are simply productive means of warfare. Anglos domesticated economic warfare, but the chinese and europeans have broken it. Europeans domesticated military warfare but russians and iranians and muslims have broken it. And the Chinese are in the process of breaking it, so we are back to undomesticated warfare, of man against man huddling in subterranean tunnels trying to escape swarms of automated weaponry that will rapidly replace tanks and artillery. Peace is just war by non-military means.
Jan 29, 2020, 8:17 PM We are always at war. Evolution is warfare. Politics and economics are simply productive means of warfare. Anglos domesticated economic warfare, but the chinese and europeans have broken it. Europeans domesticated military warfare but russians and iranians and muslims have broken it. And the Chinese are in the process of breaking it, so we are back to undomesticated warfare, of man against man huddling in subterranean tunnels trying to escape swarms of automated weaponry that will rapidly replace tanks and artillery. Peace is just war by non-military means.
Prelude to Civil War – Via Washington Himself https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/prelude-to-civil-war-via-washington-himself/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 15:00:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266746339444035584
Fascism https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/fascism/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 14:52:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266744306297077760
Feb 1, 2020, 1:54 PM 1) Fascism was a nationalist(european) reaction to counter global (jewish) communism. 2) Fascism was conceived as french socialism, and the nazis came closest to implementing it – although today’s france is not far off. The period saw the decline of religion (darwin within memory) and rapid change, so in european tradition, fascism was another attempt at a secular theology of state, given the strange european desire for authority that is alien to anglos. 3) China is perhaps the best example of a fascist state practicing monopoly authoritarianism, nationalism, insulation from ‘corrupting’ influences, information control, state corporatism, militarism, and extremely tight coupling between state, finance, and industry. (note that the chinese like the germans are very happy with this situation). In other words, Fascism won the 20th century. Period. 4) I use the term “Market Fascism” in the sense that there is zero tolerance for extra market coercion anywhere under P. This was meant as a tongue in cheek response to Islamic Fascism vs “the white law”, and to cue the audience to the severity with which free riding, rent seeking, baiting into hazard, and all the other leftist techniques would be illegal – leaving only exchanges as a means of cooperating. 5) One of the most contra-jewish-libertarian properties of fascism is that profit at the expense of the commons or people was not permitted. We confuse this with autarky, but it was more that abitrages were not permitted – which is what americans want as well. And if a resource would be short in the country by higher profits out, that sale would be prohibited. The other contra-jewish-libertarian property is that they ended interest for consumers, and that the success of state-private industrial alliances are always beneficial since capital intensive industry is always taking a credit risk that only the state can reduce. This is why I would prefer the USA and UK were investing in battery research and factories and keeping the profits rather than externalizing them to the private sector. This is a principle problem with that is not true elsewhere. We fund all this basic research with public money but it is then privatized. In other words, why is consumer interests and privatization of public research returns handed out to the investment class rather than diminishing tax burdens of the people?
Feb 1, 2020, 1:54 PM 1) Fascism was a nationalist(european) reaction to counter global (jewish) communism. 2) Fascism was conceived as french socialism, and the nazis came closest to implementing it – although today’s france is not far off. The period saw the decline of religion (darwin within memory) and rapid change, so in european tradition, fascism was another attempt at a secular theology of state, given the strange european desire for authority that is alien to anglos. 3) China is perhaps the best example of a fascist state practicing monopoly authoritarianism, nationalism, insulation from ‘corrupting’ influences, information control, state corporatism, militarism, and extremely tight coupling between state, finance, and industry. (note that the chinese like the germans are very happy with this situation). In other words, Fascism won the 20th century. Period. 4) I use the term “Market Fascism” in the sense that there is zero tolerance for extra market coercion anywhere under P. This was meant as a tongue in cheek response to Islamic Fascism vs “the white law”, and to cue the audience to the severity with which free riding, rent seeking, baiting into hazard, and all the other leftist techniques would be illegal – leaving only exchanges as a means of cooperating. 5) One of the most contra-jewish-libertarian properties of fascism is that profit at the expense of the commons or people was not permitted. We confuse this with autarky, but it was more that abitrages were not permitted – which is what americans want as well. And if a resource would be short in the country by higher profits out, that sale would be prohibited. The other contra-jewish-libertarian property is that they ended interest for consumers, and that the success of state-private industrial alliances are always beneficial since capital intensive industry is always taking a credit risk that only the state can reduce. This is why I would prefer the USA and UK were investing in battery research and factories and keeping the profits rather than externalizing them to the private sector. This is a principle problem with that is not true elsewhere. We fund all this basic research with public money but it is then privatized. In other words, why is consumer interests and privatization of public research returns handed out to the investment class rather than diminishing tax burdens of the people?