WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT by Micah Pezdirtz 1) Confidence in transparency (warranted or not) 2) Consent to policy as comprehended 3) Satisfaction with perceived outcome. (CD: That is constitutional quality. I have to put that in there somewhere. Well done.) === in response to === In the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety for the future. In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER. Trust is a synonym for predictability over time.
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
What Do People Mean by Trust in Their Government
WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT by Micah Pezdirtz 1) Confidence in transparency (warranted or not) 2) Consent to policy as comprehended 3) Satisfaction with perceived outcome. (CD: That is constitutional quality. I have to put that in there somewhere. Well done.) === in response to === In the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety for the future. In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER. Trust is a synonym for predictability over time.
-
What Do People Mean by Trust in Their Government
WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT by Micah Pezdirtz 1) Confidence in transparency (warranted or not) 2) Consent to policy as comprehended 3) Satisfaction with perceived outcome. (CD: That is constitutional quality. I have to put that in there somewhere. Well done.) === in response to === In the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety for the future. In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER. Trust is a synonym for predictability over time.
-
What Do People Mean by Trust in Their Government
WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT by Micah Pezdirtz 1) Confidence in transparency (warranted or not) 2) Consent to policy as comprehended 3) Satisfaction with perceived outcome. (CD: That is constitutional quality. I have to put that in there somewhere. Well done.) === in response to === In the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety for the future. In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER. Trust is a synonym for predictability over time.
-
Truth Before Face
Truth Before Face https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/truth-before-face/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 23:28:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267599030839738370
-
Truth Before Face
TRUTH BEFORE FACE (sensitive but true topic warning) (this is advanced political theory, read at your own risk) Postmodernism(Political Correctness, Denial of Cultural Racial and Class Differences) and Feminism(Denial of Gender Differences) are attempts to undermine the uniqueness of western civilization’s MALES. Males who speak Truth before Face, Truth Regardless of Status, Truth Regardless of offense; Truth regardless of the Competence Hierarchy, Truth regardless of the Dominance Hierarchy. The entirety of our way of life, Rule of Law, Sovereignty, Reciprocity and Jury and the reason, science, and technology that arose from it, are dependent upon the ond thing western men do that no other people do: and that is to report and report alone by speaking martial, empirical, testimonial, truth before face – anyone’s face – regardless of cost to self or others. This is the highest cost an individual can pay for his civilization. And institutionalizing it has only been done once: at the origins of western civilization, thousands of years ago. Why the change: women cannot bear it, that is why they are easy victims and practitioners of feminism and postmodernism. Women fight one another by undermining with words. So among women, because they have had so little time in the public sphere, truth before face has not been institutionalized. And just as women were sold christianity in the ancient world, they have been sold postmodernism and feminism in the modern world. And because they (a) spend 80% of the income (b) spend the majority of money (on unscientific non-STEM courses) in university, (c) consume 80% of tax revenues, (d) white women are the only group that defects against their males, and vote against truth before face, against meritocracy, and against defense of the commons from consumption. They have the entire Cathedral Complex (State, Academy, Media, Finance) working to cater to their denial, and doing so by degradation of men, truth before face, rule of law, and the entire western edifice that has made women’s freedom from labor and servitude possible. We spent millenia outlawing male anti-social behavior, but we have ceased outlawing female anti-social behavior, and face before truth, denial, and undermining are anti-social behaviors that must, like violence, be equally suppressed. That’s what our Natural Law did, and that’s what it must do again. It’s a test of Reciprocity: If men may not undermine by violence and force, women may not undermine by denial, gossiping, rallying, shaming, psychologizing, moralizing, ridiculing, and will limit themselves to truthful reciprocal speech, not disapproval and undermining as a substitute for truthful speech. If not then men will return the favor with their method of undermining, and then both genders lose.
-
Truth Before Face
TRUTH BEFORE FACE (sensitive but true topic warning) (this is advanced political theory, read at your own risk) Postmodernism(Political Correctness, Denial of Cultural Racial and Class Differences) and Feminism(Denial of Gender Differences) are attempts to undermine the uniqueness of western civilization’s MALES. Males who speak Truth before Face, Truth Regardless of Status, Truth Regardless of offense; Truth regardless of the Competence Hierarchy, Truth regardless of the Dominance Hierarchy. The entirety of our way of life, Rule of Law, Sovereignty, Reciprocity and Jury and the reason, science, and technology that arose from it, are dependent upon the ond thing western men do that no other people do: and that is to report and report alone by speaking martial, empirical, testimonial, truth before face – anyone’s face – regardless of cost to self or others. This is the highest cost an individual can pay for his civilization. And institutionalizing it has only been done once: at the origins of western civilization, thousands of years ago. Why the change: women cannot bear it, that is why they are easy victims and practitioners of feminism and postmodernism. Women fight one another by undermining with words. So among women, because they have had so little time in the public sphere, truth before face has not been institutionalized. And just as women were sold christianity in the ancient world, they have been sold postmodernism and feminism in the modern world. And because they (a) spend 80% of the income (b) spend the majority of money (on unscientific non-STEM courses) in university, (c) consume 80% of tax revenues, (d) white women are the only group that defects against their males, and vote against truth before face, against meritocracy, and against defense of the commons from consumption. They have the entire Cathedral Complex (State, Academy, Media, Finance) working to cater to their denial, and doing so by degradation of men, truth before face, rule of law, and the entire western edifice that has made women’s freedom from labor and servitude possible. We spent millenia outlawing male anti-social behavior, but we have ceased outlawing female anti-social behavior, and face before truth, denial, and undermining are anti-social behaviors that must, like violence, be equally suppressed. That’s what our Natural Law did, and that’s what it must do again. It’s a test of Reciprocity: If men may not undermine by violence and force, women may not undermine by denial, gossiping, rallying, shaming, psychologizing, moralizing, ridiculing, and will limit themselves to truthful reciprocal speech, not disapproval and undermining as a substitute for truthful speech. If not then men will return the favor with their method of undermining, and then both genders lose.
-
Access to Long Game via Explicit Strategy
Access to Long Game via Explicit Strategy https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/access-to-long-game-via-explicit-strategy/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 23:26:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267598414658887682
-
Access to Long Game via Explicit Strategy
Access to Long Game via Explicit Strategy https://t.co/wfRgMDcbsZ
-
Access to Long Game via Explicit Strategy
ACCESS TO LONG GAME VIA EXPLICIT STRATEGY by Patrick Smyth (via Alain Dwight)
“Leftists have been playing the long game for the past century, slowly insinuating themselves into powerful positions, and the right wing has been largely ignorant of it until roughly the past decade. In other words, leftist have been led by an explicit strategy (Marxism), while the right is only just formulating theirs (Propertarianism).”