Rule of Law, Monarchy as Judge of Last Resort (Britain), multi house parliaments, and a universal militia are the optimum form of government.
And you’re distracting from the fact that you claimed arbitrary self judged virtue and ethics were the objection. But we’ll let that go.
Reply addressees: @capedpersuader @MrMatt444 @NonstateA @JesseKellyDC
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Rule of Law, Monarchy as Judge of Last Resort (Britain), multi house parliaments
-
Rule of Law, Monarchy as Judge of Last Resort (Britain), multi house parliaments
Rule of Law, Monarchy as Judge of Last Resort (Britain), multi house parliaments, and a universal militia are the optimum form of government.
And you’re distracting from the fact that you claimed arbitrary self judged virtue and ethics were the objection. But we’ll let that go.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-11 20:50:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271182974093066240
Reply addressees: @capedpersuader @MrMatt444 @NonstateA @JesseKellyDC
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271163920531759107
-
Parents must love their children, Priests their flock, Generals their men, State
Parents must love their children, Priests their flock, Generals their men, Statesmen their People, and Monarchs all.
“Love thy people” isn’t a complicated instruction.
Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins -
Parents must love their children, Priests their flock, Generals their men, State
Parents must love their children, Priests their flock, Generals their men, Statesmen their People, and Monarchs all.
“Love thy people” isn’t a complicated instruction.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-11 18:49:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271152528487591937
Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271106075798827008
-
RT @XantippiS: @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump I hope you are reading his work M
RT @XantippiS: @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump I hope you are reading his work Mr. President. @curtdoolittle has the only way to fix this…
-
RT @XantippiS: @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump I hope you are reading his work M
RT @XantippiS: @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump I hope you are reading his work Mr. President. @curtdoolittle has the only way to fix this…
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-11 15:32:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271103019275386880
-
Sure. I’ll debate an anarchist. What’s the topic?
My debate with any anarchist would consist of a series of asks for the content of a constitution (contract) of terms, how such a polity could be brought into being; and how it would survive competition for trade, population, territory, and control. This invariably results in the anarchist avoiding the questions, making false or wishful claims about human nature and behavior, and counterfactual claims about history. I don’t need ‘exposure’. So would this involve wasting my time, and require me to back a naive, intellectually dishonest opponent into a corner, thus only exacerbating my reputation as ‘a meanie’, or would, once (deterministically) falsified the opponent retreated into ‘well it would be nice’, or ‘one can hope at sometime it’s a possibility’?
-
Upcoming Debate with Walter Block
Upcoming Debate with Walter Block https://t.co/Q43CGQzd5y
-
Upcoming Debate with Walter Block
Upcoming Debate with Walter Block https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/11/upcoming-debate-with-walter-block/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-11 15:00:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271095052144709635
-
Upcoming Debate with Walter Block
Apparently Walter Block and I are going to have a debate, arranged by Patrick Smith (the moderator and host of Anarchast.com MY SUGGESTED TOPIC: Justificationary Anarcho Capitalist Rational Philosophy versus Adversarial(falsificationary) Empirical Rule of Law of Reciprocity (natural law) (its really a continuation of the eternal debate between Plato vs Aristotle) This is the underlying question that divides the libertarian community, and frankly we’re the only two people living and competent to have that discussion. BUT WALTER’S TOPIC: “Is a state necessary for a just society” (The very title of which explains the problem) I don’t care the subject since no matter the framing the debate is the same. USUALLY THESE DEBATES ARE CANCELLED Usually the ANCAP community rallies to stop any MI engagement with me (out of justifiable fear). So I’ll keep y’all informed, but I pretty much expect the same.