Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • “The purpose of power is to deny people power and to force them in to agency ins

    –“The purpose of power is to deny people power and to force them in to agency instead.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 16:41:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811440575989850161

  • Jonathan is too kind. The left pushes for irresponsibility and the right pushes

    Jonathan is too kind. The left pushes for irresponsibility and the right pushes for responsibility. That’s the correct take. It’s the cause of sex and class differences.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 01:44:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811214839764709672

    Reply addressees: @MarioNawfal @JonHaidt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811214095841943735

  • I don’t think he WON’T win, I think the numbers are not that good at the moment.

    I don’t think he WON’T win, I think the numbers are not that good at the moment. Independents aren’t charged for him. And there are conservatives who might not vote at all. So unless people show up, what we saw among radical rightists in 2020 will be the same in 2024 but in…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 23:15:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811177398651539577

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811173664886542833

  • RT @Steve_Sailer: Here’s a funny/horrifying story from the Washington Post about

    RT @Steve_Sailer: Here’s a funny/horrifying story from the Washington Post about how the federal government hands out lucrative racial priv…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 20:28:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811135308131705303

  • @zarathustra5150 YES. Trifunctionalism: 1) Faith in youth (Morals, Social), 2) M

    @zarathustra5150
    YES.
    Trifunctionalism:
    1) Faith in youth (Morals, Social),
    2) Military in maturity (Duty, Political),
    3) Law in achievement (Economics, Rule)
    We need all three or else the ‘bad people’ creep through the cracks. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 20:25:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811134725089542272

  • Q: “WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE BLUE STATES OF THE NORTHEAST?” Let’s start with Connec

    Q: “WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE BLUE STATES OF THE NORTHEAST?”

    Let’s start with Connecticut:
    The Good: if you live in the non-urban green zones in CT that are still remnants of the pre-war economy, or if you live in Fairfield county, which is a tax haven for NYC, it’s a beautiful countryside in all four seasons.

    The Bad: However, other than that, there is a lot of bad. Connecticut is effectively bankrupt. The state employee pensions are unfunded, unfundable and unpayable. The Government has driven every business out of the state that isn’t military. The tax policy alone, the power of the unions, the decline of the cities made it impossible to recruit talent combined with failure to produce enough housing that drove up the cost of living, combined with exhaustively open immigration that drove down wages, combined with the general failure of post 1970 education drove not only business but people out of the state as well. The most valuable people, those who are able to obtain a STEM education, or employment under a higher quality of life, leave Connecticut at the first opportunity. The people are generally considered nihilistic. Connecticut is the second worst state for Starting businesses, and tech biz is almost impossible. (Otherwise I would have built not one company in CT and eleven in other states). Everyone who CAN leave DOES leave. Every business that can leave does leave.

    Fairfield county is the only reason the state economically survives. Otherwise the state would fiscally collapse. Everything along 91 and 95 for three miles around it is a slum all the way down to Fairfield County. The most dangerous cities in Connecticut are Hartford, New Haven, Waterbury, New Britain, and Plainville. Hartford’s overall crime rate is 81% above the national average, with a violent crime rate 180% over the national average. Other dangerous cities in Connecticut are Bloomfield, Derby, New London, East Windsor, and East Hartford.

    The Connecticut river valley until WW2 was one of the best places to live in human history – comparable only to the Loire Valley in France.

    Why? Because Yale, Trinity, and Wesleyan, combined with New England Women as the origin of Progressivism, were at least positive movements, but combined with the pre and postwar labor movement, and especially the 1960s leftist movements, adopted more soviet policy than any other state in the union.

    But unlike MA, which had to reform because of the shock of losing the technology industry to california, CT did not reform. And the public keeps doubling down. And demographically, and because of demographics, economically, and because of economically, politically, there is no chance it can be corrected.

    So until the Federal Government creates the possibility for States to go Bankrupt and renegotiate their contracts and debts (particularly with state employee unions), CT will follow other dying regions. With the top most indebted states being In order (Mass, CT, RI, NY NJ, NH, VT, Illinois, Maryland, Delaware).
    In other words Blue = Debt.

    So all the northeast’s blue states are dying. If so then why don’t they know it? What’s wrong with the people of the northeast?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 20:16:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811132299506802688

  • Not a consideration given that for all intents and purposes distances are irrele

    Not a consideration given that for all intents and purposes distances are irrelevant when considering nuclear weapons.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 19:27:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811120068018983201

    Reply addressees: @William68332190

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811115870241890396

  • Only because RU wants direct access over land through the sowalki gap. We should

    Only because RU wants direct access over land through the sowalki gap. We should not have let RU keep that once great german territory at the end of the war. If they have that, then they have a port that is much less likely to freeze in the baltic. I don’t think we need to do anything with “Koenigsberg”. The population is already turning toward europe, and as russia weakens it will seek independence/

    Reply addressees: @William68332190


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 18:16:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811102226556850176

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811098038372286638

  • Part two. Turkey can control the black sea becase it owns the bosphorus straight

    Part two. Turkey can control the black sea becase it owns the bosphorus straight. Turkey is in nato. Turkey is not a good nato ally. But it would love to control the reset of the blacksea without concern for russia. Without the black sea, russia has only polar ports closed to passage in winter. While it is hard to close the eastern ports, it’s trivial to close the western ports and the black sea.
    Russia is preserving her air power in case of escalation. But her land power is almost done.

    Reply addressees: @hbd_orbiter


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 17:50:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811095717546708993

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811092685907808636

  • Putin miscalculated because he is so afraid of technology that he only accepts p

    Putin miscalculated because he is so afraid of technology that he only accepts paper and verbal reports. He foolishily believed what he was being told byhis people – which is evidence of the failure of despotism. Are his actions otherwise rational? Of course. Given he believed the nonsense from his generals, his intelligence service, and his miltary suppliers. Given our previous reactions to his expansionary militarism in the caucuses. Given our reaction to his taking of donbas and crimea. Given the election of Biden not trump. He made a calculation based on bad information. And now he’s stuck. Because he’s going to be murdered if he loses power. The US strategy has been consistent, which is to wear down russia’s military, economy, and political legitimacy – which is taking far longer than we’d hoped or expected, but it’s working. So as long as the Ukrainian’s are willing to fight, russia will continue to bleed out until they must come to the table. And hopefully, if russia falls far enough we can integrate them rather than have them fall to china and minorities in the east, and islam from the center and south.
    I’m not ‘special’. I’m just someone sympathetic to the extreme right wing, and in return some of them tend to listen to. As far as I know all geostrategic thinkers (most of whom I know) understand this.
    The variable isn’t russia. The variable isn’t europe. Europe is doing what trump wanted them to. The variable is the potential evolution int he USA which could turn the whole world into chaos. Or the triggering of war with china which would mean we might not pay enough attention to russia over ukraine and the baltics.

    Reply addressees: @hbd_orbiter


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 17:47:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811095009875099649

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811092685907808636