Too late at night. 😉 Thought leaders can contribute and parties can coalesce on strategy fairly easily. It’s not like there is a central committee, but a consensus forms across a body of people. Carter, Regan era. Not much ‘thought’ since collapse communism. Just the opposite
Reply addressees: @BeebopSkidat @TheMigh10299553 @razibkhan
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
Too late at night. 😉 Thought leaders can contribute and parties can coalesce on
-
Opposite. Carter era. Favor biz until, like marxism-socialism, democratic social
Opposite. Carter era. Favor biz until, like marxism-socialism, democratic socialism and postmoderns and denial of human nature also failed, b/c conflict between demographics, revenues, and impossibility of endless growth.
So wait. But Immigration voided the lesson of failure.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-27 09:06:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276804064097873920
Reply addressees: @BeebopSkidat @TheMigh10299553 @razibkhan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276759161381027840
-
Opposite. Carter era. Favor biz until, like marxism-socialism, democratic social
Opposite. Carter era. Favor biz until, like marxism-socialism, democratic socialism and postmoderns and denial of human nature also failed, b/c conflict between demographics, revenues, and impossibility of endless growth.
So wait. But Immigration voided the lesson of failure.
Reply addressees: @BeebopSkidat @TheMigh10299553 @razibkhan -
No leverage. Russia isnt worth taking seriously. Texas has a bigger economy
No leverage. Russia isnt worth taking seriously. Texas has a bigger economy.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-27 02:56:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276710926020939777
Reply addressees: @steven_metz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276677742155743235
-
No leverage. Russia isnt worth taking seriously. Texas has a bigger economy
No leverage. Russia isnt worth taking seriously. Texas has a bigger economy.
Reply addressees: @steven_metz -
I say it more directly: It was a mistake because it taught people that political
I say it more directly: It was a mistake because it taught people that political activism gained one privileges NOT TO INTEGRATE. As such we have an integration problem. That’s our fundamental problem.
Reply addressees: @JSStudios2 -
I say it more directly: It was a mistake because it taught people that political
I say it more directly: It was a mistake because it taught people that political activism gained one privileges NOT TO INTEGRATE. As such we have an integration problem. That’s our fundamental problem.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-27 01:40:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276691769565028352
Reply addressees: @JSStudios2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276690092707495937
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JSStudios2 I know of it. I’ve read the TOC and the intro, and I understand the thesis. I talk about the algorithm. Caldwell the experience. The ideas more accessible from him.More explanatory of the cycle of history from me.Caldwell is right and accessible as always – and a graceful author.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1276690092707495937
-
His policy of repatriation, escalation, and forcing Europe to carry its internat
His policy of repatriation, escalation, and forcing Europe to carry its international weight was succeeding. His investment in infrastructure was blocked. No one is handling the benefits problem because it’s politically impossible. He was doing pretty well all things considered.
Reply addressees: @bdquinn @karlbykarlsmith @razibkhan -
His policy of repatriation, escalation, and forcing Europe to carry its internat
His policy of repatriation, escalation, and forcing Europe to carry its international weight was succeeding. His investment in infrastructure was blocked. No one is handling the benefits problem because it’s politically impossible. He was doing pretty well all things considered.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-27 01:23:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276687471464583168
Reply addressees: @bdquinn @karlbykarlsmith @razibkhan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276649897719214082
-
The state, unlike the military (and intel) does not run ‘war game’ simulations.
The state, unlike the military (and intel) does not run ‘war game’ simulations. The military always loses, but at least they learn from them. Health, Emergency, Commerce, and Treasury don’t run war games. So they suffer from bureaucratic rent seeking.
Reply addressees: @chriswheelerWA @orthonormalist @karlbykarlsmith @razibkhan