What moral position were they arguing for, to what demographic and leadership?
What moral position are we arguing for to what demographic and leadership?
Reply addressees: @_Indirection
Category: Politics, Power, and Governance
-
What moral position were they arguing for, to what demographic and leadership? W
-
Every one of the above other than Gandhi is an offensive revolutionary movement,
Every one of the above other than Gandhi is an offensive revolutionary movement, with Gandhi useful in eliminating populist resistance.
Conversely, the union era example is a defensive resistance movement. There is no defensive strategy that will work.
Reply addressees: @_Indirection -
Every one of the above other than Gandhi is an offensive revolutionary movement,
Every one of the above other than Gandhi is an offensive revolutionary movement, with Gandhi useful in eliminating populist resistance.
Conversely, the union era example is a defensive resistance movement. There is no defensive strategy that will work.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-18 15:30:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1295744936126619648
Reply addressees: @_Indirection
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1295743932391985155
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@_Indirection Optimums
1. Germans – Imperial and Social Oder
2. English – Political Order
3. Founders – Legal Order
4. Gandhi – Populist High Ground – Slowest
5. IRA – Political High Ground – Slow
6. Mao – Restoration Solution – Fast
7. French – “Purge” Solution
7. ISIS – Destroying – FastestOriginal post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1295743932391985155
-
Optimums 1. Germans – Imperial and Social Oder 2. English – Political Order 3. F
Optimums
1. Germans – Imperial and Social Oder
2. English – Political Order
3. Founders – Legal Order
4. Gandhi – Populist High Ground – Slowest
5. IRA – Political High Ground – Slow
6. Mao – Restoration Solution – Fast
7. French – “Purge” Solution
7. ISIS – Destroying – Fastest
Reply addressees: @_Indirection -
Optimums 1. Germans – Imperial and Social Oder 2. English – Political Order 3. F
Optimums
1. Germans – Imperial and Social Oder
2. English – Political Order
3. Founders – Legal Order
4. Gandhi – Populist High Ground – Slowest
5. IRA – Political High Ground – Slow
6. Mao – Restoration Solution – Fast
7. French – “Purge” Solution
7. ISIS – Destroying – Fastest
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-18 15:26:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1295743932391985155
Reply addressees: @_Indirection
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1295740228074901504
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@_Indirection Political window passed. Choice: Political(French) > Mixed(IRA) > Revolutionary(Mao) > Replacement(ISIS, Isam). I chose Mixed b/c strategic utility: to go either way. My use of political is to reduce resistance to a revolutionary movement. The only hole is me as frontman & Time.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1295740228074901504
-
Political window passed. Choice: Political(French) > Mixed(IRA) > Revolutionary(
Political window passed. Choice: Political(French) > Mixed(IRA) > Revolutionary(Mao) > Replacement(ISIS, Isam). I chose Mixed b/c strategic utility: to go either way. My use of political is to reduce resistance to a revolutionary movement. The only hole is me as frontman & Time.
Reply addressees: @_Indirection -
Political window passed. Choice: Political(French) > Mixed(IRA) > Revolutionary(
Political window passed. Choice: Political(French) > Mixed(IRA) > Revolutionary(Mao) > Replacement(ISIS, Isam). I chose Mixed b/c strategic utility: to go either way. My use of political is to reduce resistance to a revolutionary movement. The only hole is me as frontman & Time.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-18 15:11:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1295740228074901504
Reply addressees: @_Indirection
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1295736638040047618
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@_Indirection I didn’t recommend those tactics, I stated that if you were going to show up in small numbers and win that you’d need to use them.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1295736638040047618
-
No weapons needed. Demands, messaging, power, and fire. That’s how. “Every flame
No weapons needed. Demands, messaging, power, and fire. That’s how. “Every flame is twenty men”. The military, at least in Germanic countries, will solve the problem.
Reply addressees: @cavaller_humil -
No weapons needed. Demands, messaging, power, and fire. That’s how. “Every flame
No weapons needed. Demands, messaging, power, and fire. That’s how. “Every flame is twenty men”. The military, at least in Germanic countries, will solve the problem.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-17 15:33:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1295383367547060224
Reply addressees: @cavaller_humil
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1295382242957590528
-
RT @VDAREJamesK: Every election since the 1965 Immigration Act is illegitimate.
RT @VDAREJamesK: Every election since the 1965 Immigration Act is illegitimate. Good night.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-17 15:23:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1295380654327246848