The Revolutionary Spirit Is a Revolt Against Nature by “Undermining” https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/09/19/the-revolutionary-spirit-is-a-revolt-against-nature-by-undermining/
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 22:18:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307444092406767617
THE REVOLUTIONARY SPIRIT IS A REVOLT AGAINST NATURE BY “UNDERMINING”
E Michael Jones is perhaps the best Christian thinker working today. So he frames the Jewish revolt as against Christianity.
So change logos for laws of nature, and Christianity for indo-European discovery adaptation to, and application of laws of nature to accelerate our evolution, and that’s the difference in our positions.
Theological Christianity(Feminine, Submission) vs Scientific Aryanism (Masculine, Dominance).
The secret of European civilization, even above the Iranic and Indian, branches – both of which failed to transcend the superstitious, is the retention of the primacy of man (not god), the primacy of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws (not harmony, or peace, or dysgenics), and the primacy of the industrialization of agency at the cost of those who are unfit.
The difference between Christian and Aryan then is reducible to the Aryan treatment of the underclasses and aliens as another semi-domesticated animal to be used as necessary to transform man into gods – and the Christian treatment of the underclasses as docile workers who generate income for them and the aristocracy.
Christians don’t give up on the bottom.
Aryans do.
Both are right in their way.
The bottom has value to the transcendence of man.
The problem is Christian universalism(globalism) rather than nationalism (kin).
The Jewish spirit isn’t revolutionary it’s devolutionary: the defeat of the Indo-European project to transcend man into gods – and instead to maintain and if possible reverse evolution, so that man is a domesticated animal that can be manipulated and extracted from by priests.
https://www.fidelitypress.org/book-products/the-jewish-revolutionary-spirit?
THE REVOLUTIONARY SPIRIT IS A REVOLT AGAINST NATURE BY “UNDERMINING”
E Michael Jones is perhaps the best Christian thinker working today. So he frames the Jewish revolt as against Christianity.
So change logos for laws of nature, and Christianity for indo-European discovery adaptation to, and application of laws of nature to accelerate our evolution, and that’s the difference in our positions.
Theological Christianity(Feminine, Submission) vs Scientific Aryanism (Masculine, Dominance).
The secret of European civilization, even above the Iranic and Indian, branches – both of which failed to transcend the superstitious, is the retention of the primacy of man (not god), the primacy of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws (not harmony, or peace, or dysgenics), and the primacy of the industrialization of agency at the cost of those who are unfit.
The difference between Christian and Aryan then is reducible to the Aryan treatment of the underclasses and aliens as another semi-domesticated animal to be used as necessary to transform man into gods – and the Christian treatment of the underclasses as docile workers who generate income for them and the aristocracy.
Christians don’t give up on the bottom.
Aryans do.
Both are right in their way.
The bottom has value to the transcendence of man.
The problem is Christian universalism(globalism) rather than nationalism (kin).
The Jewish spirit isn’t revolutionary it’s devolutionary: the defeat of the Indo-European project to transcend man into gods – and instead to maintain and if possible reverse evolution, so that man is a domesticated animal that can be manipulated and extracted from by priests.
https://www.fidelitypress.org/book-products/the-jewish-revolutionary-spirit?
—“Curt: What Does State of Nature Mean?”— https://t.co/tSEkHyMSzV
—“Curt: What Does State of Nature Mean?”— https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/09/19/curt-what-does-state-of-nature-mean/
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 16:51:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307361699041865729
WHAT DOES STATE OF NATURE MEAN?
—“Curt, is “the state of nature” purely allegorical?”–Ryan Michael McDonald @ryanmcdonaldusa
It’s a reference to a presumption human instinctual incentives, and long-standing debate over human nature as moral, amoral, or immoral. The debate is over. Man is amoral (practical). Cooperation is just far more useful (and less stressful)- until conflict, violence, warfare is more useful.
That said, what natural conditions? Given stone, bronze, iron, or steel? On an island, a forest, a plain, or mountains? In the arctic, the temperate, the steppe, or desert? Alone, in a band, a tribe, a nation, or an empire? In the presence of kin, kith, competitors, or enemies?
By asking these questions we expose the bias, presumption, assumption (lie), of others. In my understanding, state of nature means what is necessary to survive at the least risk, lowest cost, greatest return, shortest time, greatest certainty.
ie: it’s all just physics. That is ‘nature’. Reciprocity is the only test of whether when humans act (interact) that we are not engaging in parasitism – a violation of physical laws.
Man is amoral. Even when moral, only as immoral as he can get away wit. Because that’s the cheapest (optimum) strategy. It’s called “efficiency”.
Western man simply suppressed as many parasitisms and falsehoods as possible.
WHAT DOES STATE OF NATURE MEAN?
—“Curt, is “the state of nature” purely allegorical?”–Ryan Michael McDonald @ryanmcdonaldusa
It’s a reference to a presumption human instinctual incentives, and long-standing debate over human nature as moral, amoral, or immoral. The debate is over. Man is amoral (practical). Cooperation is just far more useful (and less stressful)- until conflict, violence, warfare is more useful.
That said, what natural conditions? Given stone, bronze, iron, or steel? On an island, a forest, a plain, or mountains? In the arctic, the temperate, the steppe, or desert? Alone, in a band, a tribe, a nation, or an empire? In the presence of kin, kith, competitors, or enemies?
By asking these questions we expose the bias, presumption, assumption (lie), of others. In my understanding, state of nature means what is necessary to survive at the least risk, lowest cost, greatest return, shortest time, greatest certainty.
ie: it’s all just physics. That is ‘nature’. Reciprocity is the only test of whether when humans act (interact) that we are not engaging in parasitism – a violation of physical laws.
Man is amoral. Even when moral, only as immoral as he can get away wit. Because that’s the cheapest (optimum) strategy. It’s called “efficiency”.
Western man simply suppressed as many parasitisms and falsehoods as possible.
The Barriers to Right Activism https://t.co/qCwOLB2WAm
The Barriers to Right Activism https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/09/19/the-barriers-to-right-activism/
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 16:39:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307358788241043457
—“Identify the barriers and lift them. The problem is obvious but why is it like this? We need data on what these barriers are for the right. Is it the fact that they have to much to lose? Comfort? Security? Or cowardness?”—Bjorn Hocke
The barriers to right activism are:
1 – Boyhood: No intention to do anything, just find shallow dominance expression from the safety and anonymity of being online (these are undesirables);
2 – Cowardice: (lots of Xian’s in this category);
3 – Right Psychology (a) lower agreeableness (b) tendency to over-rely on self-judgment, (c) tendency to demand self-determination, need for control, need for understanding, need for certainty, need for leaders they understand. This leads to atomization and the near panic of ‘just show up and we’ll figure it out. The left ‘just shows up and figures it out. Because they are not concerned with status or hierarchy.
3 – Relative Poverty such that they can’t show up because they’re already disenfranchised; living on marginal income so that they can’t afford the time off or away;
4 – Responsibilities so that they can’t afford being away without serious consequences;
5 – Consequence of doxxing by GSRRM that would hurt them their income or their families;
6 – Wives or girlfriends that would leave them if they did;
7 – and property that they have accumulated that they are unable or willing to expose to risk.
The left is not burdend by these constraints. Why? The right manages vast commons and the left consumes them. This is the difference in our ‘wiring’. Male capitalization (pack territory and resources), female consumption (herd and offspring consumption before others beat them to it.)
This is why only a mass movement will work and ‘resistance’ won’t. It’s because without certain reprisals for the left’s DOXX machine, the right afford to show up.
Hence my strategy. Hence why everyone else’s is a lost cause.