Category: Politics, Power, and Governance

  • The problems with educational pseudoscience are not less than: 1) Teaching needs

    The problems with educational pseudoscience are not less than:

    1) Teaching needs to be professionalized, and as a second career, with demonstrated life experience, demonstrated parenting, and demonstrated success.

    2) Teaching needs to convert from instruction to game playing, which means ‘automating’, with teachers serving as referee, and coach not instructor. We must automate education in the sense that it is cheap to produce ‘large scale simulations and games’

    3) Developing Harmony under Adversarialism is more important than developing harmony at the cost of adversarialism.

    4) Grooming, Dress, and Manners; grammar, vocabulary, and diction; natural law (ethics and morals) and economics, are as important as math and reading. Most of what is taught today is secular religion and it’s a sick religion.

    5) IQ and Consciousness are equally influential. As surprising as it may seem, the living environment or education has no impact on general intelligence in adulthood. They only way to improve demonstrated intelligence in the absence of IQ is through general knowledge(IQ), and ritual(conscientiousness). Both general knowledge and ritual produce mindfulness. The optimum mindfulness is epicureanism (joy within your means), stoicism (continuous self-authoring), sport (public positive adversarialism), civic projects (public participatory production of commons), and civic festivals (public participatory holidays). (My favorite example is responsibility for the sidewalk and street in front of your home.)

    6) We need to harmonize all knowlege through operationalism and the gramamrs so that we learn all knowledge all action all of the universe is a contiuum of very simple rules. this will ensure that every field is equally accessible to every person, and taht the environment saturates individuals with that knoweldge rather than conflicts with it.

    7) History is the skeleton upon which education is crafted with the clay of knowlege..


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-25 10:10:00 UTC

  • The Clintons are the most corrupt famly in politics. The Clinton foundation inte

    The Clintons are the most corrupt famly in politics. The Clinton foundation intentionally stole 2m from my company alone. It’s just the pursuing them is even more costly.

    NO MORE LEFT LIES. NO MORE BOLSHEVISM IN AMERICA

    Reply addressees: @HKrassenstein

  • The Clintons are the most corrupt famly in politics. The Clinton foundation inte

    The Clintons are the most corrupt famly in politics. The Clinton foundation intentionally stole 2m from my company alone. It’s just the pursuing them is even more costly.

    NO MORE LEFT LIES. NO MORE BOLSHEVISM IN AMERICA


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-24 16:47:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309172629903900673

    Reply addressees: @HKrassenstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309171535291330560

  • Sorry. It doesn’t matter. You (the left) are the ones that started the ‘only pow

    Sorry. It doesn’t matter. You (the left) are the ones that started the ‘only power matters’ philosophy and destroyed our rule of law from within. When the alt-right copies you, and a president exercises discretion like you, and civil war results from you, it was you’re doing.

    Reply addressees: @ReallyAmerican1

  • Sorry. It doesn’t matter. You (the left) are the ones that started the ‘only pow

    Sorry. It doesn’t matter. You (the left) are the ones that started the ‘only power matters’ philosophy and destroyed our rule of law from within. When the alt-right copies you, and a president exercises discretion like you, and civil war results from you, it was you’re doing.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-24 16:45:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309172198817632257

    Reply addressees: @ReallyAmerican1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1308966424950517760

  • “Curt: If how are they able to run a nation (Israel) without imploding?”— How

    —“Curt: If how are they able to run a nation (Israel) without imploding?”—

    How long are the business cycle, the economic cycle, the generational cycle, the political cycle, the state cycle? Israel isn’t 100 years old yet. It’s heavily subsidized by the states. It’s militarily preserved by the states. At present the monarchies have more interest in ethnic alliance between jews and arabs than they have in ethnic alliance with Iran, since iran (ethnic persians), and Turkey (ethnic turks(mongolian) and iranics (kurds)) are the rising powers in the region, in opposition to the arabs and the north africans (proto-iranics). (The more I know about genetics the more I understaand the power of ethnocentrism and that civilzations and states are just expressions of ethnocentrism. And that empires are ethnocentric interests in producing trade.)

    So the question is, can they? How does Israel survive economically and strategically? How much longer will it survive demographically? The Arabs are just waiting them out.

    The only solution for Israel to survive is for all the world’s jews to move there, displace the Arabs, and it would be the Netherlands of the middle east, with about the same population density, same size economy, same extraordinary productivity, and from that position they could, like Rome, civilize the middle east – although through economics and imitation rather than war.

    Under that strategy, they can wait out Arab oil wealth. Islamists continue worldwide to reproduce faster than all other peoples, even if their rates of reproduction are lower. This is because Muslims reproduce and exist with the lowest capital (income) demands, the greatest substitution for family, socialization, and religious devotion for consumption.

    We don’t think of it that way but Islam is a very psychologically rewarding religion (addiction) because it is a very costly addiction. Think of it as Buddhism vs Xianity vs stoicism. How much time and how does each group spend self-regulating (in some ritual that produces mindfulness). Islam does the most with the least cognitive commitment and lowest adaptability cost.

    How much time does a protestant spend on competitive expression and materialism instead? How does a stoic do it? We all spend time somehow. We all spend our time somehow. All groups direct that time to something.

    Otherwise, the jews will continue to use the USA like they used Russia, and the pale, Spain, Germany, England, and Rome, and continue their bolshevik revolution here.

    I don’t see the Jewish identity as strong enough to form a nation when their group strategy is better satisfied by riding within and on host peoples.

    If for no other reason than they don’t produce enough people in the military caste (laboring and lower middle class) to create an army of at least 200K necessary to compete in the region.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-24 10:44:00 UTC

  • IQ, ignorance, religion, bravado. Conservatism is anti intellectual, romantic,me

    IQ, ignorance, religion, bravado. Conservatism is anti intellectual, romantic,meaning religious or secular religious, and working class. There is no market for conservative intellectuals in the aryan tradition like Jefferson or the founders. Libertarianism as intended ended them.

    Reply addressees: @bot3685

  • IQ, ignorance, religion, bravado. Conservatism is anti intellectual, romantic,me

    IQ, ignorance, religion, bravado. Conservatism is anti intellectual, romantic,meaning religious or secular religious, and working class. There is no market for conservative intellectuals in the aryan tradition like Jefferson or the founders. Libertarianism as intended ended them.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-23 18:35:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1308837485015953411

    Reply addressees: @bot3685

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1308759815229829120

  • Look. Simple. The postwar jewish intellectuals brought the bolshevik revolution

    Look. Simple. The postwar jewish intellectuals brought the bolshevik revolution to the states, and transformed it first into neo-marxism, then finally into postmodernism-feminism-libertarianism in order to reverse the demonstration of the darwinian revolution that european civ, not only in the modern, but ancient world, was eugenic. And that this bolshevism, like french moralism, and german phenominalism, is simply a more AGGRESSIVE counter-revolution against the restoration of europeanism (aristotle), and the restoration of germany (the holy roman empire, greater germania, western europe), to it’s historical trejectory as a west indo european aristocrxatic eugenic civilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-23 06:54:00 UTC

  • —-”Q: Curt: Was communism ever a good idea in Russia?”—- (a) Russia practice Sta

    —-”Q: Curt: Was communism ever a good idea in Russia?”—-

    (a) Russia practice State Socialism, with a central economy, and it was never possible to achieve communism. (It never will be). And using the communist-to-socialist (platonic) frame of reference confuses the issue. Instead, Russia created a fully militarized State, and ran the country as **an industrial age military organization**.

    (b) A military doesn’t use the market process. It creates a command economy. It organizes to produce strategic goals. The benefit of a militarized society with a command economy, is that without a market process it does not need to pay market wages. Everyone has a ‘rank’ with prescribed benefits. In this sense, Russia took Napoleonic ‘total war’ to the extreme, as a permanent political, economic, social, and familial order. Her only mistake was in attempting to ideologically expand. She made the same mistake as Hitler: ideology over empiricism.

    (c) So the **benefit** of a military order over a market order is that the savings from not having to pay market wages (wages always consume profits), could be invested in the production of commons. It’s this massive production of commons that allowed Russia to modernize.

    (d) the **drawback** is i) the problem incentives, ii) the problem of economic calculation, iii) the problem of skill atrophy, iv) the problem of creating a market for corruption, v) the problem of creating a black market, vi) the (severe) externalites that are caused by policing the problem of incentives, economic calculation, skill atrophy, corruption, and black markets. Unfortunately, Soviets (Russians) did not know how to transition out of a military economy. Observing the consequences, the Chinese copied the americans instead of the Russians and used debt and cheap labor to indusrialize at the rest of the world’s expense just as america did to europe in the 1800’s.

    (e) **Consequences**: The russians have escapted the degredation of culture since the 1960’s brought about by the ewish postwar migration of insurgency from germany to america, and the conversion of the marxist program to the neo-marxist, postmodernist, anti-male feminist program (culminating in the 2020 attempt to repeat the Bolshevik revolution here in america using BLM/Antifa).

    The west may not survive the next few decades. Russia will – and she will very likely pick up the pieces ‘for cheap’.

    In retrospect, the Fascists created a corporate state, as defense against communists that created a military state. The British and Americans failed to grasp the seriousness of the threat of communism, as a repeat of the christian destructino of rome, and the muslim destruction of the ancient world. The Chinese are not christian and not idealistic: they have adopted fascism: intolerant, ethnocentric, state corporatism, and total war. But they have used credit (the anglo invention of scale finance) to achieve what the Soviets failed to, and in doing so demonstrated that the fascists were not unique, they were simply practicing the norm in history. And chinese in doing so have restored history to it’s regular state now that the european age of optimism is ended.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-22 19:40:00 UTC