Category: Personal Reflections and Diary

  • (diary) broke my brain today. I cannot afford to take the time to dive even deep

    (diary) broke my brain today. I cannot afford to take the time to dive even deeper into the topology of meaning. And even if I do, I think that is a completely different project. As far as I know, I will not make a meaningful improvement upon operational grammar by getting down into the geometry of that level of complexity. So even though that evil machine in my head obsesses over it, I’m at the point of diminishing returns. The end result of going deeper will be contributing the the development of artificial intelligence, and not law. And while I really want to explore that problem, all I will do is justify operational grammar. and I really don’t think it requires justification. I am better off working at the level of programming languages than mathematics, because that is the lowest level that is applicable to the outcomes. And frankly, I don’t think anyone gives a damn if I go deeper. So, at least today, I am going to fight my autistic machine and just say that I’m leaving that level of detail for later work. And I can spend my old age working on it if I want to – unless someone gets there first. Ergo, I am going to try to complete the work now using this level of precision and bear the criticism of any formalists by saying that I just can’t take another two or three years to work through that level of detail.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-13 20:45:00 UTC

  • (diary) broke my brain today. I cannot afford to take the time to dive even deep

    (diary) broke my brain today. I cannot afford to take the time to dive even deeper into the topology of meaning. And even if I do, I think that is a completely different project. As far as I know, I will not make a meaningful improvement upon operational grammar by getting down into the geometry of that level of complexity. So even though that evil machine in my head obsesses over it, I’m at the point of diminishing returns. The end result of going deeper will be contributing the the development of artificial intelligence, and not law. And while I really want to explore that problem, all I will do is justify operational grammar. and I really don’t think it requires justification. I am better off working at the level of programming languages than mathematics, because that is the lowest level that is applicable to the outcomes. And frankly, I don’t think anyone gives a damn if I go deeper. So, at least today, I am going to fight my autistic machine and just say that I’m leaving that level of detail for later work. And I can spend my old age working on it if I want to – unless someone gets there first. Ergo, I am going to try to complete the work now using this level of precision and bear the criticism of any formalists by saying that I just can’t take another two or three years to work through that level of detail.
  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-13 19:45:00 UTC

  • For Newbs

    —“You always go in hard and soften up. It is fascinating to watch.”— Andy Curzon Andy has been a partner in my investigations for years now. And while I wasn’t going to call this out, I think its important for newbies to understand why I am such a relentless critic of some of our most cherished ideas. He means that the way I investigate the truth and value of an idea is by attempting to exhaustively falsify it. And the veracity of my attacks on any given subject are continued evidence of my commitment to falsification. Meaning, that I do not treat anything as a truth candidate unless *I have no other alternative*. There is a grain of truth in almost anything. But finding that potential needle in any given haystack generally requires burning the haystack to the ground so that only the metal remains. Truth is unforgiving. But once I have discovered that grain of truth – for example, the secret of western adaptive velocity, or the secret of christianity – or in the failure of the 20th century philosophers to discover operational epistemology – then I no longer need to attack the subject and can then be forgiving of our many mortal failures. This is important since it takes a great deal of intellectual honesty to perform this kind of work – few of us are emotionally able to – and it takes a great deal of character and intellectual honest to follow such investigations. Investigations that dismantle your cherished values. So if you are going to come along on this journey, it might help to understand, that there is an extremely important method to my antagonisms. But that once an investigation is done, we move on.
  • FOR NEWBS —“You always go in hard and soften up. It is fascinating to watch.”-

    FOR NEWBS

    —“You always go in hard and soften up. It is fascinating to watch.”— Andy Curzon

    Andy has been a partner in my investigations for years now. And while I wasn’t going to call this out, I think its important for newbies to understand why I am such a relentless critic of some of our most cherished ideas.

    He means that the way I investigate the truth and value of an idea is by attempting to exhaustively falsify it.

    And the veracity of my attacks on any given subject are continued evidence of my commitment to falsification. Meaning, that I do not treat anything as a truth candidate unless *I have no other alternative*.

    There is a grain of truth in almost anything. But finding that potential needle in any given haystack generally requires burning the haystack to the ground so that only the metal remains.

    Truth is unforgiving.

    But once I have discovered that grain of truth – for example, the secret of western adaptive velocity, or the secret of christianity – or in the failure of the 20th century philosophers to discover operational epistemology – then I no longer need to attack the subject and can then be forgiving of our many mortal failures.

    This is important since it takes a great deal of intellectual honesty to perform this kind of work – few of us are emotionally able to – and it takes a great deal of character and intellectual honest to follow such investigations. Investigations that dismantle your cherished values.

    So if you are going to come along on this journey, it might help to understand, that there is an extremely important method to my antagonisms. But that once an investigation is done, we move on.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-13 15:11:00 UTC

  • THE STRONG DO

    THE STRONG DO.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 20:45:00 UTC

  • Updated Nov 12, 2017, 1:10 PM

    Updated Nov 12, 2017, 1:10 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 13:10:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23472984_10155876860832264_23623081

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23472984_10155876860832264_23623081

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23472984_10155876860832264_2362308116803873718_n_10155876860832264.jpg RAISE POST PRIORITY FOR FOLLOWERSRAISE POST PRIORITY FOR FOLLOWERS


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 12:54:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23473059_10155876771817264_85709393

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23473059_10155876771817264_85709393

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23473059_10155876771817264_8570939338002079009_n_10155876771817264.jpg HOW TO RAISE POST PRIORITY FOR YOUR FEED.Curt DoolittleNov 12, 2017 12:28pmRob RandallI click on Follow and then See First and your posts always get priority in my feed.Nov 12, 2017 12:37pmCurt DoolittleAdded.Nov 12, 2017 12:54pmCurt Doolittlethx. ;)Nov 12, 2017 12:54pmHOW TO RAISE POST PRIORITY FOR YOUR FEED.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 12:27:00 UTC