Category: Personal Reflections and Diary
-
(quote of the day) —“Generally speaking, I find I have more fun with my pants
(quote of the day) —“Generally speaking, I find I have more fun with my pants off.”— (some actor) -
(quote of the day) —“Generally speaking, I find I have more fun with my pants
(quote of the day)
—“Generally speaking, I find I have more fun with my pants off.”— (some actor)
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-29 09:51:00 UTC
-
Grumbly
(It bothers me when someone interrupts me when I’m concentrating. It bothers me more when I’m writing. It bothers me far more when I’m programming. Now, if the house is burning down. Or someone is injured. You know, that’s an exception. But – wth – why do you think it’s ok? And the fact that I or anyone else works all the time doesn’t mean anything other than … you don’t.) -
Grumbly
(It bothers me when someone interrupts me when I’m concentrating. It bothers me more when I’m writing. It bothers me far more when I’m programming. Now, if the house is burning down. Or someone is injured. You know, that’s an exception. But – wth – why do you think it’s ok? And the fact that I or anyone else works all the time doesn’t mean anything other than … you don’t.) -
GRUMBLY (It bothers me when someone interrupts me when I’m concentrating. It bot
GRUMBLY
(It bothers me when someone interrupts me when I’m concentrating.
It bothers me more when I’m writing.
It bothers me far more when I’m programming.
Now, if the house is burning down.
Or someone is injured.
You know, that’s an exception.
But – wth – why do you think it’s ok?
And the fact that I or anyone else works all the time doesn’t mean anything other than … you don’t.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-27 15:17:00 UTC
-
The Etiquette Of Singing
I have a “singy” family. I’m a “singy” person. No shower is safe. No empty house or apartment. No vacant sidewalk, or hiking trail. Bluesy rock preferably. The more complicated the better. Singing more than a few notes to remind others of a theme, violates etiquette during conversation, whether at the table or in the round. (You can look it up.) The reason being, that with a captive audience, one forces attention upon one’s self and interrupts conversation amongst others. It’s a dominance expression. It’s a form of aggression. Because singing is a form of soliloquy – internal voice – that is fine alone, or when it won’t interrupt anyone’s thoughts or speech, or while working together, or at invitation, or when organized by a group, or when that is the purpose of the forum. In other words, when it is not a dominance expression. Most of us would like to share our emotions by sharing the songs that remind us of evoking them – except that few if any of us share those emotions via the same melody. And among musicians it’s not uncommon to hum or sing a few notes as a part of a conversation. But there is a difference between sharing our emotions and imposing them. Music is precognitive. Myself, I am extremely intolerant of dominance expressions and I have an OCD problem in that I can only tolerate so much ‘stupid’ or ‘mundane’ speech, or ‘pretentious sentimentality’ before I subconsciously dominate conversations as a self defense measure – especially if I cannot use comedy to interrupt them. I know this. I struggle to control it. I control it when I can by leaving the room, if not the venue. As an autist it is a constant struggle against a profoundly intense impulse. I usually ask people “Am I talking too much?”, or say “It’s ok to tell me to stop talking.” There is absolutely no way I will be aware of disinterest or incomprehension, and highly unlikely aware of offense. It’s an autist thing. We just have no idea unless that is all we are looking for. We all have impulses in conversation that we must suppress. We all succeed or fail to varying degrees. It’s all very human. So all of us struggle to maneuver the flow of conversation into safe, familiar, or at least interesting content. And away from unsafe, unfamiliar, frustrating, conflict-creating or offensive content. We all seek to impose order on a kaleidic universe such that we can find a satisfactory way through our lives. So this bit of etiquette is another example of why we spend too much time with televisions and not enough time socializing – and then we wonder why the internal voice we share with close family, the television, and the walls is unwelcome in broader group context: we live lifestyles that gives us freedom to be anti-social in many subtle ways, then wondering why we don’t fit in to social situations, and end up lonely. Ergo, norms protect us from this. And we have no norms…. -
The Etiquette Of Singing
I have a “singy” family. I’m a “singy” person. No shower is safe. No empty house or apartment. No vacant sidewalk, or hiking trail. Bluesy rock preferably. The more complicated the better. Singing more than a few notes to remind others of a theme, violates etiquette during conversation, whether at the table or in the round. (You can look it up.) The reason being, that with a captive audience, one forces attention upon one’s self and interrupts conversation amongst others. It’s a dominance expression. It’s a form of aggression. Because singing is a form of soliloquy – internal voice – that is fine alone, or when it won’t interrupt anyone’s thoughts or speech, or while working together, or at invitation, or when organized by a group, or when that is the purpose of the forum. In other words, when it is not a dominance expression. Most of us would like to share our emotions by sharing the songs that remind us of evoking them – except that few if any of us share those emotions via the same melody. And among musicians it’s not uncommon to hum or sing a few notes as a part of a conversation. But there is a difference between sharing our emotions and imposing them. Music is precognitive. Myself, I am extremely intolerant of dominance expressions and I have an OCD problem in that I can only tolerate so much ‘stupid’ or ‘mundane’ speech, or ‘pretentious sentimentality’ before I subconsciously dominate conversations as a self defense measure – especially if I cannot use comedy to interrupt them. I know this. I struggle to control it. I control it when I can by leaving the room, if not the venue. As an autist it is a constant struggle against a profoundly intense impulse. I usually ask people “Am I talking too much?”, or say “It’s ok to tell me to stop talking.” There is absolutely no way I will be aware of disinterest or incomprehension, and highly unlikely aware of offense. It’s an autist thing. We just have no idea unless that is all we are looking for. We all have impulses in conversation that we must suppress. We all succeed or fail to varying degrees. It’s all very human. So all of us struggle to maneuver the flow of conversation into safe, familiar, or at least interesting content. And away from unsafe, unfamiliar, frustrating, conflict-creating or offensive content. We all seek to impose order on a kaleidic universe such that we can find a satisfactory way through our lives. So this bit of etiquette is another example of why we spend too much time with televisions and not enough time socializing – and then we wonder why the internal voice we share with close family, the television, and the walls is unwelcome in broader group context: we live lifestyles that gives us freedom to be anti-social in many subtle ways, then wondering why we don’t fit in to social situations, and end up lonely. Ergo, norms protect us from this. And we have no norms…. -
THE ETIQUETTE OF SINGING I have a “singy” family. I’m a “singy” person. No showe
THE ETIQUETTE OF SINGING
I have a “singy” family. I’m a “singy” person. No shower is safe. No empty house or apartment. No vacant sidewalk, or hiking trail. Bluesy rock preferably. The more complicated the better.
Singing more than a few notes to remind others of a theme, violates etiquette during conversation, whether at the table or in the round. (You can look it up.) The reason being, that with a captive audience, one forces attention upon one’s self and interrupts conversation amongst others. It’s a dominance expression. It’s a form of aggression. Because singing is a form of soliloquy – internal voice – that is fine alone, or when it won’t interrupt anyone’s thoughts or speech, or while working together, or at invitation, or when organized by a group, or when that is the purpose of the forum. In other words, when it is not a dominance expression.
Most of us would like to share our emotions by sharing the songs that remind us of evoking them – except that few if any of us share those emotions via the same melody. And among musicians it’s not uncommon to hum or sing a few notes as a part of a conversation. But there is a difference between sharing our emotions and imposing them. Music is precognitive.
Myself, I am extremely intolerant of dominance expressions and I have an OCD problem in that I can only tolerate so much ‘stupid’ or ‘mundane’ speech, or ‘pretentious sentimentality’ before I subconsciously dominate conversations as a self defense measure – especially if I cannot use comedy to interrupt them. I know this. I struggle to control it. I control it when I can by leaving the room, if not the venue. As an autist it is a constant struggle against a profoundly intense impulse.
I usually ask people “Am I talking too much?”, or say “It’s ok to tell me to stop talking.” There is absolutely no way I will be aware of disinterest or incomprehension, and highly unlikely aware of offense. It’s an autist thing. We just have no idea unless that is all we are looking for.
We all have impulses in conversation that we must suppress. We all succeed or fail to varying degrees. It’s all very human. So all of us struggle to maneuver the flow of conversation into safe, familiar, or at least interesting content. And away from unsafe, unfamiliar, frustrating, conflict-creating or offensive content.
We all seek to impose order on a kaleidic universe such that we can find a satisfactory way through our lives.
So this bit of etiquette is another example of why we spend too much time with televisions and not enough time socializing – and then we wonder why the internal voice we share with close family, the television, and the walls is unwelcome in broader group context: we live lifestyles that gives us freedom to be anti-social in many subtle ways, then wondering why we don’t fit in to social situations, and end up lonely. Ergo, norms protect us from this. And we have no norms….
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-27 09:23:00 UTC
-
Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline
Eric Danelaw wrote on a timeline.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-27 08:24:00 UTC
-
Movies Of 2017
All in all a terrible year. (really.) Recommend that you might not have seen: 1 – A Ghost Story (very indy) My Fave. 2 – Get Out (a little indy) Loved it. (Steppford Wives) 3 – Free Fire (very indy) (british + hong kong + LA) I liked but …eh: 1 – Life. (Really.) A production on B movie. Good. 2 – American Made. (Really) Enjoyed it. I wanted to like, but didn’t. 1 – Blade Runner 2049 – omfg lame plot line – horrible. 2 – Alien covenant…. ruined the mythos. 3 – It… Weak. 4 – Dunkirk… He did nothing wrong, sorry. 5 – Dark Tower. Lost Opportunity of the year. Lame. I expected to be horrible and was ok. 1 – Atomic Blonde 2 – The Snowman 3 – Shot Caller 4 – Good Time 5 – You were never really here 6 – A cure for wellness 7 – Wind River 8 – Unlocked I expected to be weak and they were bad: 1 – John Wick … ok. failure to combine western action with hong kong – seems to be a theme of late. Great gun moves, otherwise ridiculous. 2 – Ghost in the shell. a) she isn’t attractive even with the plastic surgery, b) the … oh forget it. it’s horrible. 3 – Valerian. a) casting. b) story. And from Luc Besson? omfg. 4 – Resident Evil …. the undead need to die, and so does every movie after the first. 5 – King Arthur. Ok Interesting actors – absolutely sh–t script, by a director who should know better. 6 – Murder on the Orient Express. 7 – The Circle 8 – Split 9 – Raw I expected to be horrible and didn’t bother: 1 – everything and anything comic-book. Sorry. We had Conan, Epic, Creepy. Superhero Comics were for … well. Criticism earned. 2 – All the usual postmodern character-study dramas…. sorry. Most were unwatchable. I haven:t seen: 1 – disaster whatever 2 – daniel day lewis’ last movie. LESSON OF THE YEAR 1 – Ridley Scott needs to retire. Like, five years ago. 2 – Postmodernism is over when myth returns. They hate myth. Myth requires sacrifice by heroes.