LIBERTY IS LIKE TRUTH
Liberty is like truth : there is infinitely more of it than you have, no matter how much you have at present. Liberty is not a state. It’s a pursuit.
(repost) (worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-08 06:31:00 UTC
LIBERTY IS LIKE TRUTH
Liberty is like truth : there is infinitely more of it than you have, no matter how much you have at present. Liberty is not a state. It’s a pursuit.
(repost) (worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-08 06:31:00 UTC
Click for video: videos/10539961_10152564978272264_1472034547_n_10152564962362264.mp4 Short video on my work on Propertarianism.

Source date (UTC): 2014-07-07 03:52:00 UTC
[P]ropertarianism can be used to describe, compare, and advocate any political system in rigidly logical, universally commensurable form. While one can surely advocate liberty with it, its primary purpose is to suppress error, fallacy and deception. Its the logic of cooperation. The logic of ethics and politics. Aristocratic Egalitarianism can be argued with it. Which I do every day. And AE is the most ethical political model yet developed. But propertarianism only allows me to argue in favor of it logically and truthfully – to construct proofs. But preference for any given political order is still one if choice.
[P]ropertarianism can be used to describe, compare, and advocate any political system in rigidly logical, universally commensurable form. While one can surely advocate liberty with it, its primary purpose is to suppress error, fallacy and deception. Its the logic of cooperation. The logic of ethics and politics. Aristocratic Egalitarianism can be argued with it. Which I do every day. And AE is the most ethical political model yet developed. But propertarianism only allows me to argue in favor of it logically and truthfully – to construct proofs. But preference for any given political order is still one if choice.
[P]ropertarianism can be used to describe, compare, and advocate any political system in rigidly logical, universally commensurable form. While one can surely advocate liberty with it, its primary purpose is to suppress error, fallacy and deception. Its the logic of cooperation. The logic of ethics and politics. Aristocratic Egalitarianism can be argued with it. Which I do every day. And AE is the most ethical political model yet developed. But propertarianism only allows me to argue in favor of it logically and truthfully – to construct proofs. But preference for any given political order is still one if choice.
[P]ropertarianism can be used to describe, compare, and advocate any political system in rigidly logical, universally commensurable form. While one can surely advocate liberty with it, its primary purpose is to suppress error, fallacy and deception. Its the logic of cooperation. The logic of ethics and politics. Aristocratic Egalitarianism can be argued with it. Which I do every day. And AE is the most ethical political model yet developed. But propertarianism only allows me to argue in favor of it logically and truthfully – to construct proofs. But preference for any given political order is still one if choice.
PROPERTARIANISM IS A OF LOGIC OF COOPERATION, NOT A PHILOSOPHICAL PREFERENCE.
Propertarianism can be used to describe, compare, and advocate any political system in rigidly logical, universally commensurable form.
While one can surely advocate liberty with it, its primary purpose is to suppress error, fallacy and deception.
Its the logic of cooperation. The logic of ethics and politics.
Aristocratic Egalitarianism can be argued with it. Which I do every day.
And AE is the most ethical political model yet developed.
But propertarianism only allows me to argue in favor of it logically and truthfully – to construct proofs.
But preference for any given political order is still one if choice.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 19:19:00 UTC
[M]any immoral things are convenient. The reason we refrain from them despite their convenience, is that when we agree to cooperate with others, we agree to avoid exporting costs onto them as individuals, and we agree not to pollute the commons and therefore export costs onto them as a group. There is no difference between polluting a stream, and composing and publishing a theory in non-operational (particularly experiential) language. Both are immoral.
[M]any immoral things are convenient. The reason we refrain from them despite their convenience, is that when we agree to cooperate with others, we agree to avoid exporting costs onto them as individuals, and we agree not to pollute the commons and therefore export costs onto them as a group. There is no difference between polluting a stream, and composing and publishing a theory in non-operational (particularly experiential) language. Both are immoral.
UTILITY DOES NOT SANCTION IMMORALITY
Many immoral things are convenient. The reason we refrain from them despite their convenience, is that when we agree to cooperate with others, we agree to avoid exporting costs onto them as individuals, and we agree not to pollute the commons and therefore export costs onto them as a group.
There is no difference between polluting a stream, and composing and publishing a theory in non-operational (particularly experiential) language. Both are immoral.
Source date (UTC): 2014-07-02 01:35:00 UTC