–“What is Rule of Law by the natural law, but altruistic punishment?”– Martin Stepan
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-28 15:59:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651979345961811974
–“What is Rule of Law by the natural law, but altruistic punishment?”– Martin Stepan
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-28 15:59:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651979345961811974
(core) (sex differences)
Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉
P-Law requires we cognitively switch to the use of series (measures) rather than sets (ideals). So you can’t reduce everything to single test as (archaic) philosophical “set-morons” do. Mathiness, Verbalism, Ideals, and Sets are what prevented and still resist evolution into computation, operations, original measures, and ordinal tests.
But because you’ve been indoctrinated by religion, philosophy, and moral reasoning into ‘doing it wrong’ – simply because doing it wrong is simpler and requires less knowledge, it’s harder for you to learn how to ‘do it right’.
Everything we do: disambiguation into a system of measurement, by enumeration serialization and operationalization, producing ordinal measures, from which we produce tests by a series of ordinal measures.
So, Instead, we test the entire spectrum of sex differences in cognition just as we test the entire spectrum of testimony, reciprocity, and demonstrated interests, and the hierarchy of ternary logic at physical scale to trifunctional behaviors at macro scale.
So just as we have checklists for testimony(truth), reciprocity(morality), and demonstrated interests (facts), we have checklists for male and female differences – but the list is quite large, and this is only the first order of that list:
Masculine: Supply: predator, systematizing, over time, physical(outcomes), empirical thinking, political, loyal, harming, productive status via accumulation of responsibility for capital (capitalizing).
-versus-
Feminine: Demand: prey, empathizing, in time, emotional(experiential), magical thinking, social, devoted, undermining, parasitic, status via accumulating irresponsibiilty for capital (hyperconsumption).
Whenever you’re making a comparison between ‘left (feminine) and right (masculine) cognitive and moral biases, then you must run the entire list, lest you misapply causality.
Fast Focused Predator over time vs Reactive General Prey in time is just the beginning of the sex differences in brain organization that we too often reduce to ‘reals vs feels’.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-28 13:59:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651949376405753860
(core) (sex differences)
Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉
P-Law requires we cognitively switch to the use of series (measures) rather than sets (ideals). So you can’t reduce everything to single test as (archaic) philosophical “set-morons” do. Mathiness, Verbalism, Ideals, and Sets are what prevented and still resist evolution into computation, operations, original measures, and ordinal tests.
But because you’ve been indoctrinated by religion, philosophy, and moral reasoning into ‘doing it wrong’ – simply because doing it wrong is simpler and requires less knowledge, it’s harder for you to learn how to ‘do it right’.
Everything we do: disambiguation into a system of measurement, by enumeration serialization and operationalization, producing ordinal measures, from which we produce tests by a series of ordinal measures.
So, Instead, we test the entire spectrum of sex differences in cognition just as we test the entire spectrum of testimony, reciprocity, and demonstrated interests, and the hierarchy of ternary logic at physical scale to trifunctional behaviors at macro scale.
So just as we have checklists for testimony(truth), reciprocity(morality), and demonstrated interests (facts), we have checklists for male and female differences – but the list is quite large, and this is only the first order of that list:
Masculine: Supply: predator, systematizing, over time, physical(outcomes), empirical thinking, political, loyal, harming, productive status via accumulation of responsibility for capital (capitalizing).
-versus-
Feminine: Demand: prey, empathizing, in time, emotional(experiential), magical thinking, social, devoted, undermining, parasitic, status via accumulating irresponsibiilty for capital (hyperconsumption).
Whenever you’re making a comparison between ‘left (feminine) and right (masculine) cognitive and moral biases, then you must run the entire list, lest you misapply causality.
Fast Focused Predator over time vs Reactive General Prey in time is just the beginning of the sex differences in brain organization that we too often reduce to ‘reals vs feels’.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-28 13:59:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651949376602767362
RT @LukeWeinhagen: You can only cooperate where you retain the option to not cooperate.
Expand those options as widely as possible for you…
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-27 17:34:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651640938073038882
–“the existence of a common law made of rules and principles in conformity with nature and which are imposed on all without discrimination. In Rhetoric, Aristotle asserts: “Universal law is the law of Nature.”–
Natural Law = Laws of Man that Conform to the Laws of Nature
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-26 23:28:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651367689351200770
Reply addressees: @CrackerYakub
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651365129278091264
–“the existence of a common law made of rules and principles in conformity with nature and which are imposed on all without discrimination. In Rhetoric, Aristotle asserts: “Universal law is the law of Nature.”–
Natural Law = Laws of Man that Conform to the Laws of Nature
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-26 23:28:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651367689246367745
Natural Law’s basis is purely empirical (now). Religion as a set of rituals that produce social weights and measures (commensurability) must produce mindfulness. That is not to say that religions must be supernatural whatsoever (stoicism, and early buddhism). Or that fictional characters are needed (shinto), or that we must lie that we know the words of supernatural entities (hinduism, abrahmamic religions). Can we make a religion free of lies? Sure.
Reply addressees: @CrackerYakub
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-26 23:26:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651367139389964294
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651365129278091264
Natural Law’s basis is purely empirical (now). Religion as a set of rituals that produce social weights and measures (commensurability) must produce mindfulness. That is not to say that religions must be supernatural whatsoever (stoicism, and early buddhism). Or that fictional characters are needed (shinto), or that we must lie that we know the words of supernatural entities (hinduism, abrahmamic religions). Can we make a religion free of lies? Sure.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-26 23:26:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651367139524190210
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651365129278091264
That’s why we require self determination, self determined means, AND sovereignty and reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-22 21:06:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1649882302183350276
Reply addressees: @StevePender
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1649881035134365697
Sure. One can self determine by raiding, r*aping, looting, and pillaging just fine. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-22 21:05:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1649882026412064771
Reply addressees: @StevePender
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1649881035134365697