Evil: costs imposed on others for the purpose of causing suffering and loss rather than for purposes of personal gain.
There is evil in this world.
George Soros.
Serial Killers.
Barak Obama.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-11 11:02:00 UTC
Evil: costs imposed on others for the purpose of causing suffering and loss rather than for purposes of personal gain.
There is evil in this world.
George Soros.
Serial Killers.
Barak Obama.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-11 11:02:00 UTC
DEFINITIONS OF MORAL, ETHICAL, CRIMINAL
Moral: costs imposed by externality.
Ethical: costs imposed interpersonally.
Criminal: costs imposed physically
Evil: costs imposed for the purpose of imposing costs and causing suffering rather than for personal gain.
Objective morality: necessary/natural law. (think physical law, and natural law.)
Normative morality : evolved morality – includes normative contractual provisions. If a moral norm requires the bearing of a cost, and one violates that norm, one imposes a cost upon those who bear the cost. (think contract law)
Traditional Moral Commands: Religious contract traditions that may or may not be in fact moral. Since a religion requires a contract of one sort or another that causes mass behavior that is usually costly to members, it is a violation of that normative contract that imposes costs upon others to fail to observe it. (think legislation)
Declining Traditional, Religious, and normative moral rules: changing circumstance has eliminate the value of the prior order’s demand for to forgo an opportunity or bear a cost. Some continue to pay and others do not, but objectively the value of the behavior has declined. (think outdated legislation)
Abnormal Moral Rules: signal traditions that are objectively immoral but have not been eradicated through competition. (Think ancient traditions that actually cause harm.)
This is pretty much how it works world ’round.
Curt
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-11 10:54:00 UTC
#libertarian #conservative #altright #NRx #propertarianism To testify (speak) without due diligence is to engage in fraud. Argument=promise.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-10 07:24:00 UTC
—“What benefit is there, in protecting liars from retaliation, if they can be shown to be liars? Why do you want to protect liars, unless you should be one yourself?”— Eli Harman
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-09 03:41:00 UTC
[I] will insure the liberty of any man of any race in any territory, by use of art and arms, who will insure my liberty in return by use of art and arms. This is Paternalism. Sovereignty. Nobility. Aristocracy. To raise mankind from beast to god – one generation, one father, at a time.
[I] will insure the liberty of any man of any race in any territory, by use of art and arms, who will insure my liberty in return by use of art and arms. This is Paternalism. Sovereignty. Nobility. Aristocracy. To raise mankind from beast to god – one generation, one father, at a time.
The way you solve lying is by duel.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 08:47:00 UTC
I will insure the liberty of any man of any race in any territory, by use of art and arms, who will insure my liberty in return by use of art and arms.
This is nobility. Paternalism. Sovereignty. To raise mankind from beast to god – one generation, one father, at a time.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 05:53:00 UTC
if you can voluntarily exchange that is fine. If both that is fine. If parasitic then kill them. It’s not complicated.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-06 21:11:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/706588141491261440
Reply addressees: @Wasian_NRx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/702711185385398272
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/702711185385398272
I would rather invest in a moral man regardless of his abilities than invest in intelligent men regardless of his morality.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-04 16:24:00 UTC