Why? Because violence = intrinsically neutral value. If put to moral ends a virtue and to immoral ends a crime. Might Can Make #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 09:03:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721625007709929472
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
A man who does not fight for liberty and morality is a coward and a thief – and
A man who does not fight for liberty and morality is a coward and a thief – and has not earned liberty or morality by his actions. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 05:14:00 UTC
-
Ergo you have no virtue whatsoever if you fail to use violence to suppress paras
Ergo you have no virtue whatsoever if you fail to use violence to suppress parasitism in interpersonal(moral) and political form. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 05:13:00 UTC
-
So it is not that I have some passion for violence, but a passion to prosecute t
So it is not that I have some passion for violence, but a passion to prosecute those who fail to construct liberty while claiming virtues.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 05:10:00 UTC
-
Those who eschew violence seek only to escape the high cost of creating a condit
Those who eschew violence seek only to escape the high cost of creating a condition of personal morality and political liberty. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 05:04:00 UTC
-
Western Social Science: Natural Law: Acquisition, Property, Cooperation, Manners
Western Social Science: Natural Law: Acquisition, Property, Cooperation, Manners, Ethics, Morals, Liberty, Aristocracy. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-15 16:06:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721006918500773889
-
Western Social Science: Natural Law: Acquisition, Property, Cooperation, Manners
Western Social Science: Natural Law: Acquisition, Property, Cooperation, Manners, Ethics, Morals, Liberty, Aristocracy. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-15 12:07:00 UTC
-
Moral = necessity for In-group Cooperation. Not Survival against out-group compe
Moral = necessity for In-group Cooperation. Not Survival against out-group competition. so no.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-13 10:36:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720198911617536000
Reply addressees: @draknats @DJTWMAR
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720190063695409152
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720190063695409152
-
Incremental suppression of parasitism against other’s expenditures in all forms.
Incremental suppression of parasitism against other’s expenditures in all forms. So yes.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-13 08:42:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720170273069248512
Reply addressees: @DJTWMAR
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720169582263017472
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720169582263017472
-
Naturalistic Fallacy Reigns in most fields. Humans choose cooperation or predati
Naturalistic Fallacy Reigns in most fields. Humans choose cooperation or predation. The choice is rational: kill parasites and predators.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-13 08:32:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720167671728365568