Guaranteed Retaliation. Romans insured one another. We must again insure one another.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-14 03:09:00 UTC
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
Why?Because the first question of ethics and politics,is ‘If I can, why don’t I
Why?Because the first question of ethics and politics,is ‘If I can, why don’t I just kill you and take it?’
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-13 16:14:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/764495332424179712
Reply addressees: @ontologicalepi @SanguineEmpiric
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/764493929509027840
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/764493929509027840
-
Where what is transferred was obtained by the same, or by ‘creation’ (first use)
Where what is transferred was obtained by the same, or by ‘creation’ (first use).
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-13 16:13:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/764495116862164993
Reply addressees: @ontologicalepi @SanguineEmpiric
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/764493929509027840
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/764493929509027840
-
No political action may be taken that is not reversible. Or framed alternatively
No political action may be taken that is not reversible.
Or framed alternatively: no action may be taken that one cannot pay restitution for the consequences.
Or framed alternately: no government had the right to pursue immigration.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-13 15:36:00 UTC
-
but are we sufficiently different that natural law does not serve as perfectly d
http://time.com/91081/what-science-says-about-race-and-genetics/Yes but are we sufficiently different that natural law does not serve as perfectly decidable in matters of cooperation and conflict?
That we differ enough in some ways does not mean we are incompatible.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-12 09:44:00 UTC
-
Untitled
http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/25/q-what-is-your-position-on-slavery/
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-11 15:51:00 UTC
-
This is what you can do with Propertarianism: perfect, analytic, argument
This is what you can do with Propertarianism: perfect, analytic, argument. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/763668539836358656
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-11 09:30:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/763668892220784641
-
is what you can do with Propertarianism: perfect, analytic, argument
https://t.co/PUaFEltGolThis is what you can do with Propertarianism: perfect, analytic, argument.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-11 05:30:00 UTC
-
Why do we have rights?
Why do we have rights? https://www.quora.com/Why-do-we-have-rights/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=2b818d3f
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-11 04:49:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/763598286410379264
-
do we have rights?
https://t.co/W7x1jOtfpmWhy do we have rights?
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-11 00:50:00 UTC