Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • ( I don’t get involved in ‘***gates’. Rallying and shaming is for common folk. S

    ( I don’t get involved in ‘***gates’. Rallying and shaming is for common folk. Sorry. The substantive problem is the lack of rule of law under natural law with which we can prosecute by violence acts of harm, theft, fraud, and deceit. Everything else is just monkeys hooting at one another across territories. So either pull out your weapons and beat, break, kill, and burn, or look in the mirror at the monkey. It’s about that effective. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-07 11:43:00 UTC

  • DOES PROPERTARIANISM’S NATURAL LAW REQUIRE THAT MUCH IQ? It doesn’t take all tha

    DOES PROPERTARIANISM’S NATURAL LAW REQUIRE THAT MUCH IQ?

    It doesn’t take all that high an iQ to learn Propertarianism: Natural Law. The difference is that we live the existing anglo law and we don’t live Propertarianism’s Natural Law. So while there is more content to the study of the existing law, there is more novelty in the study of Propertarianism. So it’s not that you need to LEARN so much in Propertarianism, it’s that you have to RELEARN quite a bit.

    We humans rely heavily on intuition and overestimate our reason. So learning a lot of confirmations like the existing law, is much easier than learning a lot of reformations like Natural Law.

    The reason we invest the time in learning something reforming like Propertarianism’s Natural Law, is the additional explanatory power, coercive power, and justification for violence that it gives us.

    So yes, it is somewhat hard to learn if you want to prosecute, less so if you want to persuade, and less so if you want to know what to fight for, and less so if you just want justification to fight.

    Learn only what you need to.

    A few us of us need to be prosecutors, a few more lawyers, a few more sheriffs, but a whole lot of warriors. Warriors just need to know the objective, and to fight. The rest of us just administrate the result.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 11:55:00 UTC

  • Most philosophies, religions train advocates, or judges. We train prosecutors, a

    Most philosophies, religions train advocates, or judges. We train prosecutors, and give moral license to executioners.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 10:27:00 UTC

  • FUNDAMENTALIST NATURAL LAW (important piece) If many promote fundamentalist isla

    FUNDAMENTALIST NATURAL LAW

    (important piece)

    If many promote fundamentalist islam, fundamentalist marxism, fundamentalist judaism, fundamentalist christianity, fundamentalist political correctness, surely there is room for fundamentalist NATURAL LAW?

    I suppose it wouldn’t occur to people that we could treat Physical Law, Natural Law, and Testimonial Law (truth) as the word of the gods? And that we need no ‘prophet’. We’ve been slowly discovering the word of god as written in the universe, the record of man’s behavior, and the means of speaking god’s language of truth, for thousands of years. (so what has everyone else been doing?)

    I suppose it wouldn’t occur to people that if expansionary fundamentalist islam, like expansionary fundamentalist marxism before it, like expansionary fundamentalist christianity, like expansionary fundamentalist equalitarian social democracy, can be imposed by idea, propaganda, rebellion, terrorism, and seizure of the academy, of the media, and of the state, then another minority could rely on Truth instead of mysticism, pseudo-rationalism, pseudoscience, and outright lying to evolve from idea, propaganda, rebellion, terrorism, and seizure of the academy, of the media, and of the state. It’s been done before by violence. It can just as easily if not more easily be done again.

    I suppose it wouldn’t occur to people that if zealots, soldiers, lawyers, judges, propagandists, politicians, and imperial bureaucracies can impose rule over societies using other forms of fundamentalism, why we can’t also use the same range of personnel to impose Fundamentalist Natural Law.

    I suppose it wouldn’t occur to people that just as each prior era was unimaginable and unpredictable to all but a few.

    Revolutions require tinder to burn.

    And the centuries of lies have left deadfall everywhere.

    We need only light the match.

    It starts with one act, by one man.

    then two acts by two men.

    Then twenty acts by one hundred men.

    Then a hundred acts by ten thousand men

    Then on transformation by one million men.

    The future belongs to those who take it.

    There is no place in history for the weak.

    There is no substitute for action.

    And there is no equal to violence.

    There is but one word of god: Truth.

    There is but one rule of god: Natural Law.

    All those who disobey the rule of god,

    Deny man transcendence into gods.

    Every lie blocks the way to godhood.

    Every liar piles blocks in our way.

    Every institution of lies creates a fortress in our way.

    Purge the lies

    Purge the liars

    Purge the fortresses of lies.

    —————————

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 10:09:00 UTC

  • Ethics of cooperative and sentient creatures capable of choosing between opportu

    Ethics of cooperative and sentient creatures capable of choosing between opportunities, must develop both objective morality (ethics of ‘natural law’) and group competitive ethics (moral norms), and individual competitive ethics (personal moral judgements). The principle conflicts in the study of manners, ethics, morality, and group evolutionary strategy (law of cooperation), are caused by (a) differences in male and female reproductive strategy, (b) differences in the desirability of the classes (associative, reproductive, economic, political, and military), and (c) differences in distributions of abilities between groups (tribes), and (d) necessities of territorial adaptation. Ergo while ethics(and morals) are objectively decidable across any group, because objectively decidable ethics exist, individuals, groups, and very large groups each construct portfolios of more complex normative and personal ethics(morals) so that they can successfully compete against other peers, genders, classes, tribes, nations, and civilizations. This does not mean that we cannot say one civilization’s nation’s, tribe’s, class’, gender’s person’s are decidability more moral than another’s. But then, these things we call ethics (morals) are tools of evolution. And both prey, parasite, and predator exist between organisms in nature, and prey, parasite and predator exist within organisms as well.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-04 17:37:00 UTC

  • 1/3 We don’t need institutionalize positive beliefs if we have sufficient negati

    1/3 We don’t need institutionalize positive beliefs if we have sufficient negative prohibitions. #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-04 00:32:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/805208084838838272

  • 2/3 Natural Law Nomocracy Provides Sufficient Prohibitions to replace the need f

    2/3 Natural Law Nomocracy Provides Sufficient Prohibitions to replace the need for institutionalized positive beliefs. #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-04 00:31:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/805207906765381632

  • Natural Law Nomocracy of Sovereign Men is technically correct. But ‘Market Fasci

    Natural Law Nomocracy of Sovereign Men is technically correct. But ‘Market Fascism’ feels better when you say it. #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-04 00:29:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/805207338663743488