Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Learning Propertarianism (Natural Law)

    How Can I Learn About Propertarianism (Natural Law)

    Our Advice

    • Read the Overview – The Overviews page discusses key concepts and then refers  you to our ‘short courses’ or collections of posts on the novel concepts.
    • Watch The Videos – The Videos present hour long discussions of the novel concepts.
    • Take the Courses – The Propertarian Institute is Offering Courses (Spring 2017) in Natural law.

    What Else?

    • Read the posts in the “Core” – The Core contains the full spectrum of Natural Law (propertarianism) and Testimonial Law (testimonialism), and Market Government (which I, tongue-in-cheek, refer to as ‘Market Fascism’).
    • Learn to write and speak using “E-Prime” (it’s a bit hard). E-Prime will introduce you to writing ‘clearly’ by which we mean, in operational language.
    • Follow Curt on Facebook – I tend to repeat central themes in order to make it easier for new people to latch onto something familiar
    • Work your way through the Reading List – Our reading list contains the major works that will help you understand the different fields (this is a LOT of material).
    • Work your way through thousands of posts on Propertarianism.com – There is no substitute for reading a lot of short posts that repeat the basic ideas in different contexts. Propertarianism is non trivial and repetition beats concentration.

    How Long It Will Take?

    How long would it take you to learn to program a computer in an object oriented language? To study Calculus? To Study Accounting? To Study Economics? To study the law? Any technical discipline with it’s own methods and terminology takes about a year to ‘learn’, two years to feel comfortable with, and three years to be effective with, four years to be creative with, and five or six years to master: the 10,000 hour rule. This is just a rule of thumb when discussing how long it takes for humans to learn anything at all.  Some of us are faster and some of us slower, but in general, those who are faster can tolerate accumulating hours more so than those who are slower. But in the end, it’s hours.

    That said, if you read the Short Courses and watch the Videos, in one month you will see how it all fits together, and in three months you will find that it has affected your thinking.

    Our experience is that on average, if you read the articles, follow me, Eli, and a few others, that in six months you will ‘understand’ everything we say. It will take you about a year to ‘start thinking’ in Natural Law – and that’s when you’ll feel the explanatory power starts affecting your life. Then, sort of like a light switch, over a very short period of time, all human activity will ‘make sense’ in very simple terms. “Everything becomes obvious.”

    If you have come to Propertarianism through the usual route: Constitutionalist or Classical Liberal > Libertarian > Anarcho Capitalist > NRx > Propertarianism, then your progress will be much faster.

    If you have studied one of the hard sciences so that you are familiar with the scientific method and scientific epistemology, then your progress will be faster.

    If you have at least some understanding of accounting, finance, or economics, then it will be much faster.

    If you have a background in philosophy – it might actually slow you down: most of philosophy, like most of religion, is nonsense or outright falsehood: fantasy literature.

    (If you have abnormal behavior and you’re looking for justification of it, you won’t find it here – you will find that there is a differences between tolerance and advocacy and abnormal behavior is not something that will be sanctioned in any society for long. Go see the left libertarians. They love deviant, selfish, anti-social behavior.)

    But in general the more you know the easier it will be to learn.

  • Seems like we are done with the problem solving. Now it’s up to teaching and dis

    Seems like we are done with the problem solving. Now it’s up to teaching and distributing.

    I am pretty confident that I can run a set of courses on Natural Law, and that I can teach every class that I need to.

    I am quite good on stage, I have taught, but not to a camera – and I worry about it.

    I can’t see a seminar format working becuase it requires graduate students with expertise in the subject matter and this subject matter is too alien.

    I have a burning urge to create courses because I think the incremental rollout of those courses will give me what I need to write the book in a newer, simpler, more accessible form.

    If I look at the chapters I drafted last summer and fall they are not as good as the work I would write today. And I think by teaching I will learn even better to write the book. I am not sure.

    What I do know is that every draft is dramatically shorter and that it is now something I can produce in short form, despite its scope.

    Moreover, it is very hard to sit and work without feedback. yet writing scripts for videos turns out to be an excellent method of writing chapters.

    So that’s what I’m thinking. It’s time to get started on those.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-30 19:58:00 UTC

  • AND EXPANDED OVERVIEW OF PROPERTARIANISM

    https://propertarianism.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/UPDATED AND EXPANDED OVERVIEW OF PROPERTARIANISM


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-30 15:09:00 UTC

  • A Short Course In Natural Law

    Simple Version: The Position of Natural Law in the Hierarchy of Laws of the Universe.
    1. Physical Laws – the laws of the physical universe.
    2. Human Law – The limits of ability in Humans,
    3. Natural Law: Law of Cooperation,
    4. Informational (Testimonial) Law – Laws of Communication,
    5. Sentient Law – Laws of Intelligence (pattern recognition).
    WHAT DO WE MEAN BY NATURAL LAW?
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/19/what-does-natural-law-mean/
    A DEFINITION OF NATURAL LAW
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/01/12/definitionnatural-law/
    MORE ON NATURAL LAW
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/29/natural-law/
    RETURNS ON COOPERATION: WHY WE NEED NATURAL LAW
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/06/29/the-first-principles-of-propertarian-ethics/
    FIRST PRINCIPLES OF ETHICS: NATURAL LAW DECIDES THEM
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/06/29/the-first-principles-of-propertarian-ethics/
    A COMPLETE SCIENCE: TRUTH , THE LAW OF INFORMATION, THE NATURAL LAW OF COOPERATION, AND THE PHYSICAL LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE.
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/02/02/truth-natural-law-physical-law/
    DIAGRAM OF THE COMPLETE SCIENCES
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/category/attributes/law/
    SCIENCE (TESTIMONY) IS A DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/17/no-science-is-a-moral-discipline-within-natural-law-the-means-by-which-we-warrant-the-truthfulness-of-our-statements/
    THE GRAMMAR OF OPERATIONALISM
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/02/20/natural-law-and-the-grammar-of-operational-language/
    GRAMMAR, SYNTAX, DATATYPES, and OPERATIONS
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/23/propertarianism-datatypes-operations-grammar-syntax/
  • A Short Course In Natural Law

    Simple Version: The Position of Natural Law in the Hierarchy of Laws of the Universe.
    1. Physical Laws – the laws of the physical universe.
    2. Human Law – The limits of ability in Humans,
    3. Natural Law: Law of Cooperation,
    4. Informational (Testimonial) Law – Laws of Communication,
    5. Sentient Law – Laws of Intelligence (pattern recognition).
    WHAT DO WE MEAN BY NATURAL LAW?
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/19/what-does-natural-law-mean/
    A DEFINITION OF NATURAL LAW
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/01/12/definitionnatural-law/
    MORE ON NATURAL LAW
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/29/natural-law/
    RETURNS ON COOPERATION: WHY WE NEED NATURAL LAW
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/06/29/the-first-principles-of-propertarian-ethics/
    FIRST PRINCIPLES OF ETHICS: NATURAL LAW DECIDES THEM
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/06/29/the-first-principles-of-propertarian-ethics/
    A COMPLETE SCIENCE: TRUTH , THE LAW OF INFORMATION, THE NATURAL LAW OF COOPERATION, AND THE PHYSICAL LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE.
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/02/02/truth-natural-law-physical-law/
    DIAGRAM OF THE COMPLETE SCIENCES
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/category/attributes/law/
    SCIENCE (TESTIMONY) IS A DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/17/no-science-is-a-moral-discipline-within-natural-law-the-means-by-which-we-warrant-the-truthfulness-of-our-statements/
    THE GRAMMAR OF OPERATIONALISM
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/02/20/natural-law-and-the-grammar-of-operational-language/
    GRAMMAR, SYNTAX, DATATYPES, and OPERATIONS
    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/23/propertarianism-datatypes-operations-grammar-syntax/
  • Natural Law

    If we define Moral Intuitions as the reactions we feel in response to our thoughts and actions and those of others. If we define Normative Morality as the reactions we feel given  for methods of decidability given some set of assumptions. If we define philosophy (positive and literary) as the search for methods of decidability within a domain of preference, and If we define truth  (negative and descriptive) as the search for methods of decidability across all domains regardless of preference. Then: We find that personal moral intuition is the product of our genes, and our experiential development. And it varies greatly from individual to individual. We find that existing normative morality is the product of evolutionary accident and we learn it through experience and observation – although it does vary a little from individual to individual within groups, and varies widely between groups. We find that positive or literary philosophy(fiction or philosophy) informs, suggests opportunities, and justifies preferences for the purpose of forming cooperation and alliances between individuals and groups. We find that negative or juridical philosophy(truth or law) decides, states limits, and discounts preferences, for the purpose of resolving conflicts between individuals and groups. We find that juridical philosophy attempts to explain the common law, without necessarily succeeding at doing so.  But that the transformation of juridical philosophy to juridical science is eminently possible – we just may not like what we learn, any more than we learned in each previous reformation of our thinking. Natural Law (propertarianism), is a negative, descriptive, juridical science, not a fictional literature. It is not a rational philosophy limited to internal correspondence. Its not a moral norm. Nor is it necessarily a moral intuition that all would agree to. It is the record of the arguments by which we decide conflicts over investments we have made, and protect.  And from these records we can identify a very simple single law – non imposition of costs upon anything whatsoever that others have invested in producing whether informational, behavioral, material, or institutional. And from those observations we may discover general rules. Just as in any other science. And there is only one of them.

  • Natural Law

    If we define Moral Intuitions as the reactions we feel in response to our thoughts and actions and those of others. If we define Normative Morality as the reactions we feel given  for methods of decidability given some set of assumptions. If we define philosophy (positive and literary) as the search for methods of decidability within a domain of preference, and If we define truth  (negative and descriptive) as the search for methods of decidability across all domains regardless of preference. Then: We find that personal moral intuition is the product of our genes, and our experiential development. And it varies greatly from individual to individual. We find that existing normative morality is the product of evolutionary accident and we learn it through experience and observation – although it does vary a little from individual to individual within groups, and varies widely between groups. We find that positive or literary philosophy(fiction or philosophy) informs, suggests opportunities, and justifies preferences for the purpose of forming cooperation and alliances between individuals and groups. We find that negative or juridical philosophy(truth or law) decides, states limits, and discounts preferences, for the purpose of resolving conflicts between individuals and groups. We find that juridical philosophy attempts to explain the common law, without necessarily succeeding at doing so.  But that the transformation of juridical philosophy to juridical science is eminently possible – we just may not like what we learn, any more than we learned in each previous reformation of our thinking. Natural Law (propertarianism), is a negative, descriptive, juridical science, not a fictional literature. It is not a rational philosophy limited to internal correspondence. Its not a moral norm. Nor is it necessarily a moral intuition that all would agree to. It is the record of the arguments by which we decide conflicts over investments we have made, and protect.  And from these records we can identify a very simple single law – non imposition of costs upon anything whatsoever that others have invested in producing whether informational, behavioral, material, or institutional. And from those observations we may discover general rules. Just as in any other science. And there is only one of them.

  • BASICS FOR NEWBIES

    https://propertarianism.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/PROPERTARIANISM’S BASICS FOR NEWBIES.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-29 18:19:00 UTC

  • A SHORT COURSE IN NATURAL LAW (draft. without markets doesn’t tie it all togethe

    A SHORT COURSE IN NATURAL LAW

    (draft. without markets doesn’t tie it all together)

    WHAT DO WE MEAN BY NATURAL LAW?

    https://propertarianism.com/2016/09/19/what-does-natural-law-mean/

    A DEFINITION OF NATURAL LAW

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/01/12/definitionnatural-law/

    MORE ON NATURAL LAW

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/03/29/natural-law/

    RETURNS ON COOPERATION: WHY WE NEED NATURAL LAW

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/06/29/the-first-principles-of-propertarian-ethics/

    A COMPLETE SCIENCE: TRUTH , THE LAW OF INFORMATION, THE NATURAL LAW OF COOPERATION, AND THE PHYSICAL LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE.

    https://propertarianism.com/2016/02/02/truth-natural-law-physical-law/

    DIAGRAM OF THE COMPLETE SCIENCES

    https://propertarianism.com/category/attributes/law/

    SCIENCE (TESTIMONY) IS A DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW

    https://propertarianism.com/2016/11/17/no-science-is-a-moral-discipline-within-natural-law-the-means-by-which-we-warrant-the-truthfulness-of-our-statements/

    THE GRAMMAR OF OPERATIONALISM

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/02/20/natural-law-and-the-grammar-of-operational-language/

    GRAMMAR, SYNTAX, DATATYPES, and OPERATIONS

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/03/23/propertarianism-datatypes-operations-grammar-syntax/


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-29 16:29:00 UTC

  • it’s almost impossible for even the most dedicated of people to switch from thin

    it’s almost impossible for even the most dedicated of people to switch from thinking in terms of good, to thinking in terms of true. If you use natural law as your means of decidability, then that which is true will in fact always be a good. But only the market can decide if it is a preferred good. You can’t. No matter how hard you try. So try to determine if something is true not good. Any ‘good’ you can imagine will be subjectively decided based upon some outcome you prefer. Whereas natural law will merely ensure that we select preferences that produce goods regardless of what we imagine.

    Its all just math at this point.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-27 18:35:00 UTC