Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • As far as I know, any violation of Natural Law qualifies as extremism. If your c

    As far as I know, any violation of Natural Law qualifies as extremism. If your cult violates natural law it must be eradicated. First from the west, if not then from the rest.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-06 09:55:00 UTC

  • “sometimes it seems you make cases for things that seem in contradiction with ce

    —“sometimes it seems you make cases for things that seem in contradiction with certain parts of reciprocity. I do think my primary problem of understanding has been discerning whether your speaking descriptively or prescriptively.”—

    Well it depends on whether I’m talking about reciprocity (natural law) or aristocratic egalitarianism (rule by natural law). You can create ANY government and economic order under natural law that you want to. It will just be a truthful and transparent one.

    You can also create a perfect government (aristocratic egalitarianism) which is what i RECOMMEND.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-04 20:26:00 UTC

  • POSITIVE RECIPROCITY IS JUST AS IMPOSSIBLE AS POSITIVE FREEDOM. Reciprocity: pro

    POSITIVE RECIPROCITY IS JUST AS IMPOSSIBLE AS POSITIVE FREEDOM.

    Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, limited to productive externalities.

    What can you think of that you worry about that will survive that test of reciprocity? You see, you can’t force someone into reciprocity by means of ‘gift’ so to speak. They have to willingly accept it. There are things we might create insurance for as an act of reciprocal insurance against risks.

    So, whenever you have doubts, try to imagine cases (operations) rather than general intuitions (ideals).

    Warfare (reciprocal insurance of territorial monopoly and all capital within it) is the means by which we create reciprocity in the first place. So no, there is no escape from fighting.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-04 10:21:00 UTC

  • THIS. THIS RIGHT HERE. —“Curt Doolittle’s ‘Natural Law of Reciprocity’ operati

    THIS. THIS RIGHT HERE.

    —“Curt Doolittle’s ‘Natural Law of Reciprocity’ operationalizes Kant’s categorical imperative as a functional measurement of interpersonal relations.”— Joel Davis

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-04 08:42:00 UTC

  • THE PLAN —“So what’s the plan Curt?”—Rob McMullan The plan is, and always ha

    THE PLAN

    —“So what’s the plan Curt?”—Rob McMullan

    The plan is, and always has been, a ‘Bible’ of Natural Law –

    ‘The Book of the West’, beyond which none may tread, or death is the consequence 😉

    Plato failed. We don’t have to. We can succeed. 🙂

    De Monarchia: The Cult of Non Submission. The Scripture of Nobility. The Philosophy of Aristocracy. The Natural Law of Sovereign Men. The Order of the Militia.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-04 08:39:00 UTC

  • REPOSTED ON REQUEST: BASIC IDEAS OF PROPERTARIANISM ( i wish there was a way to

    REPOSTED ON REQUEST: BASIC IDEAS OF PROPERTARIANISM

    ( i wish there was a way to post links on our fb pages for quick reference.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-03 12:18:00 UTC

  • Follow me a bit longer. Because in my proposition, the primary new cost is truth

    Follow me a bit longer. Because in my proposition, the primary new cost is truth. The primary new benefit is dramatic reduction in parasitism upon you and work you must provide. And there is nothing obtained by redistribution that is not paid for. And the payment for non contribution is merely non reproduction – not suffering.

    (worth expanding and repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-02 12:21:00 UTC

  • WHY DO YOU RESIST TRUTHFULNESS IN THE COMMONS? In other words, why you want room

    WHY DO YOU RESIST TRUTHFULNESS IN THE COMMONS?

    In other words, why you want room to load frame, suggest, obscure, fictionalize and deceive? There is a difference between false, useful, preferable, good, and true. I only worry about false, criminal, unethical, and immoral. The market can choose whatever it wants as long as it is not false (including criminal, unethical, and immoral.) So literature and myth are different from fictionalism.

    Fictionalism (religion, idealism, pseudoscience, deception) lies.

    Myth and literature advise.

    Science and law decide.

    There is no place for justifying the conflation of the competition between advice and decidability into the monopoly authority and faith.

    It’s just lying. Plain and simple.

    And the consequences for jews, christians, and muslims have been tragic and the consequences for the world because of jews, christians, and muslims has been tragic.

    So what excuse do you make for THE PRESERVATION OF EVIL?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-02 12:02:00 UTC

  • THE THREE GOALS: NATURAL LAW, ARTIFICIAL WOMBS, SETTLING THE STARS. The most imp

    THE THREE GOALS: NATURAL LAW, ARTIFICIAL WOMBS, SETTLING THE STARS.

    The most important innovation on behalf of white people and western civilization, is the artificial womb. By harvesting eggs and sperm, even without much genetic modification, we can make armies by selective breeding with or without the cooperation of women, and with or without the limitation of the few exceptional women, and with or without the rate and tolerance for births of exceptional women.

    So you might say the stars, and I will say the artificial womb. and I will venture that the artificial womb will get us to the stars faster than is otherwise possible. If for no other reason than we are no longer paying the high cost keeping human beings alive for much of the journey.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-01 08:24:00 UTC

  • WISE UP: NATURAL LAW *WILL* SAVE THE WEST AND EMPOWER IT. —“I’ve read on natur

    WISE UP: NATURAL LAW *WILL* SAVE THE WEST AND EMPOWER IT.

    —“I’ve read on natural law and I still don’t understand it. Sounds like a cover all for social pseudo-science that sounds clever.”— A Friend.

    You should have stopped with ‘i don’t understand it’. Because that’s all you can honestly say.

    Either you believe your people are in fact superior and can out-compete others if they eliminate the ability to engage in parasitism, or you admit that they are inferior. There is no way out of it.

    I think every thinking person is aware that this is my point. We discovered and use natural law because we CAN use it.

    But you might also want to look at the evolution of natural law (of cooperation) just as we look at the evolution of physical laws (of nature). And as such you may have an archaic understanding of it.

    So my position is (empirically), that western civilization AND western peoples are superior – although I attribute that superiority to the result of civilization more so than original genetics (i might be wrong).

    And that under natural law, the lesser peoples cannot compete. And instead of preserving our current vulnerability to those lesser peoples, I want to FIX OUR VULNERABILITY by the institution of natural law, so that no other peoples CAN do what they have done, and our ‘betrayers’ internally cannot do what they have done.

    This means we pay the cost of ending Christianity as the germans have tried to at least three times now.

    Because christianity is the door through which we have been defeated twice.

    We cannot leave open that door – or any door that allows the unfit to argue, to act, or to profit.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-28 12:17:00 UTC