Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Anarchists vs Libertarians vs Sovereigntarians I think we agree on what constitu

    Anarchists vs Libertarians vs Sovereigntarians I think we agree on what constitutes aggression. I think we disagree about the scope of property against one can aggress, and the responsibilities we bear for the Commons.
  • “Reciprocity or War” There exist no ‘goods’ or ‘truths’ outside of reciprocity.

    “Reciprocity or War”

    There exist no ‘goods’ or ‘truths’ outside of reciprocity. All else is preference not good or truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 13:13:00 UTC

  • “Reciprocity or War” There exist no ‘goods’ or ‘truths’ outside of reciprocity.

    “Reciprocity or War” There exist no ‘goods’ or ‘truths’ outside of reciprocity. All else is preference not good or truth.
  • “Reciprocity or War” There exist no ‘goods’ or ‘truths’ outside of reciprocity.

    “Reciprocity or War” There exist no ‘goods’ or ‘truths’ outside of reciprocity. All else is preference not good or truth.
  • NAP: “JUST SAY NO”. Nope to N.A.P. Non imposition against borne costs of any kin

    NAP: “JUST SAY NO”.

    Nope to N.A.P. Non imposition against borne costs of any kind, leaving only voluntary reciprocity, accumulating all possible capital, and absent incentive for retaliation (productive agrarianism) , is very different from non aggression against intersubjectively verifiable property (parasitic pastoralism), which minimizes capital accumulation, and maintains incentives for retaliation over differences in investment in capital.

    Sovereignty by force, not liberty by begging for permission.

    Capital (property in toto) not just personal property.

    Masculine Capital Intensive, Commons intensive Civilization vs Feminine consumption in tensive, commons abandoning, pastoralism

    K of male and predators, vs r of female and grazers.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 12:32:00 UTC

  • NAP: “JUST SAY NO”. Nope to N.A.P. Non imposition against borne costs of any kin

    NAP: “JUST SAY NO”. Nope to N.A.P. Non imposition against borne costs of any kind, leaving only voluntary reciprocity, accumulating all possible capital, and absent incentive for retaliation (productive agrarianism) , is very different from non aggression against intersubjectively verifiable property (parasitic pastoralism), which minimizes capital accumulation, and maintains incentives for retaliation over differences in investment in capital. Sovereignty by force, not liberty by begging for permission. Capital (property in toto) not just personal property. Masculine Capital Intensive, Commons intensive Civilization vs Feminine consumption in tensive, commons abandoning, pastoralism K of male and predators, vs r of female and grazers.
  • NAP: “JUST SAY NO”. Nope to N.A.P. Non imposition against borne costs of any kin

    NAP: “JUST SAY NO”. Nope to N.A.P. Non imposition against borne costs of any kind, leaving only voluntary reciprocity, accumulating all possible capital, and absent incentive for retaliation (productive agrarianism) , is very different from non aggression against intersubjectively verifiable property (parasitic pastoralism), which minimizes capital accumulation, and maintains incentives for retaliation over differences in investment in capital. Sovereignty by force, not liberty by begging for permission. Capital (property in toto) not just personal property. Masculine Capital Intensive, Commons intensive Civilization vs Feminine consumption in tensive, commons abandoning, pastoralism K of male and predators, vs r of female and grazers.
  • Becoming Gods

    I told everyone all along that if you understand Propertarianism, that like Copernicus’ universe, like Darwin’s evolution, and like artificial intelligence’s forthcoming consciousness, that knowledge is liberating and empowering but dehumanizing. Maturity comes at the cost of the comforts of ignorance and innocence. Awareness that you have superceded your fairy tales, superceded your impulses, superceded your parents, superseded, conventions, superseded legislation and regulation, superseded competitors, and superseded all but a few of mankind. Each step in the development of agency takes us farther toward calculation and farther away from the retreat into the animal brain of impulse instead of reason and submission to the pack instinct instead of rule. The universe is not kind. That is why it needs gods. And gods we can, must, and shall be. Although it is likely that not all of us can make the journey. For those that can, welcome to the post-human – to the language and thought of gods: one continuous set of relations from the fabric of the actionable universe to every potential transformation of it. Return to Paternal, Eugenic, Evolutionary Rule as our primary occupation. The incremental, intergenerational, production of gods. Man, warrior, craftsman, husband, father, judge, headman, aristos, hero, legend, god.
  • Becoming Gods

    I told everyone all along that if you understand Propertarianism, that like Copernicus’ universe, like Darwin’s evolution, and like artificial intelligence’s forthcoming consciousness, that knowledge is liberating and empowering but dehumanizing. Maturity comes at the cost of the comforts of ignorance and innocence. Awareness that you have superceded your fairy tales, superceded your impulses, superceded your parents, superseded, conventions, superseded legislation and regulation, superseded competitors, and superseded all but a few of mankind. Each step in the development of agency takes us farther toward calculation and farther away from the retreat into the animal brain of impulse instead of reason and submission to the pack instinct instead of rule. The universe is not kind. That is why it needs gods. And gods we can, must, and shall be. Although it is likely that not all of us can make the journey. For those that can, welcome to the post-human – to the language and thought of gods: one continuous set of relations from the fabric of the actionable universe to every potential transformation of it. Return to Paternal, Eugenic, Evolutionary Rule as our primary occupation. The incremental, intergenerational, production of gods. Man, warrior, craftsman, husband, father, judge, headman, aristos, hero, legend, god.
  • BECOMING GODS I told everyone all along that if you understand Propertarianism,

    BECOMING GODS

    I told everyone all along that if you understand Propertarianism, that like Copernicus’ universe, like Darwin’s evolution, and like artificial intelligence’s forthcoming consciousness, that knowledge is liberating and empowering but dehumanizing.

    Maturity comes at the cost of the comforts of ignorance and innocence. Awareness that you have superceded your fairy tales, superceded your impulses, superceded your parents, superseded, conventions, superseded legislation and regulation, superseded competitors, and superseded all but a few of mankind. Each step in the development of agency takes us farther toward calculation and farther away from the retreat into the animal brain of impulse instead of reason and submission to the pack instinct instead of rule.

    The universe is not kind. That is why it needs gods. And gods we can, must, and shall be. Although it is likely that not all of us can make the journey. For those that can, welcome to the post-human – to the language and thought of gods: one continuous set of relations from the fabric of the actionable universe to every potential transformation of it.

    Return to Paternal, Eugenic, Evolutionary Rule as our primary occupation. The incremental, intergenerational, production of gods.

    Man, warrior, craftsman, husband, father, judge, headman, aristos, hero, legend, god.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 10:22:00 UTC