Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Think of it this way: For those of us who are strong, able, influential, and res

    Think of it this way: For those of us who are strong, able, influential, and resourceful enough to impose our will on others regardless of their opinions, the only reason not do is if we limit our conflict to truthful, scientific, voluntary exchanges. Thats western civilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 00:24:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975166025477050368

    Reply addressees: @belle_levesque @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975152050328584192

    IN REPLY TO:

    @belle_levesque

    @jordanbpeterson fan.

    Surprise. https://t.co/1oMsRg9VS9

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975152050328584192

  • Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he t

    Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he thinks he is evil, but because his actions are warranted – either via punishment, retribution, restitution, profit, or some version of ‘getting his or her fair share’ (which is the justification we make for most of ou…

  • Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he t

    Curt Doolittle’s answer: Every person who does evil, does not do so because he thinks he is evil, but because his actions are warranted – either via punishment, retribution, restitution, profit, or some version of ‘getting his or her fair share’ (which is the justification we make for most of ou…

  • It’s rather technical, (natural law of reciprocity) and it’s the logic behind th

    It’s rather technical, (natural law of reciprocity) and it’s the logic behind the constitution and our ancient tradition of germanic common law. -Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 20:33:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975107899176386565

    Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975046491810160640

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975046491810160640

  • Ergo, there is no condition under which untruthful speech does not violate recip

    Ergo, there is no condition under which untruthful speech does not violate reciprocity and therefore sovereignty, and therefore insurance of reciprocity and sovereignty. Either you can warranty your words our you are externalizing costs of doing so onto others.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 15:38:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975033664881987584

    Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975027765014536197

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975027765014536197

  • So it is ‘Freedom FROM’ false, criminal, unethical, and immoral display, word, a

    So it is ‘Freedom FROM’ false, criminal, unethical, and immoral display, word, and deed. In other words, the only moral rule equally extensible to all is RECIPROCITY (exchange).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 13:52:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975007013565599744

    Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974991370174660608

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974991370174660608

  • Positive freedoms cannot exist because they force others to bear your costs agai

    Positive freedoms cannot exist because they force others to bear your costs against their will. Only negative freedoms are equally extensible to all because they ask us NOT to do something. Rights are merely positive expressions of the right to sue for restitution.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 13:49:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975006275162574848

    Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974991370174660608

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974991370174660608

  • POSITIVE FREEDOMS CANNOT EXIST Positive freedoms cannot exist because they force

    POSITIVE FREEDOMS CANNOT EXIST

    Positive freedoms cannot exist because they force others to bear your costs against their will. Only negative freedoms are equally extensible to all because they ask us NOT to do something. Rights are merely positive expressions of the right to sue for restitution.

    So it is ‘Freedom FROM’ false, criminal, unethical, and immoral display, word, and deed. In other words, the only moral rule equally extensible to all is RECIPROCITY (exchange).

    So while the moral person wants freedom of all speech under the assumption others only err, or are victims of their ability and ignorance, the reality is that the industrialization of lying by pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and propaganda in the 20th century has caused damage only equalled by the Abrahamic Dark Age. Westerners have produced the only existing high trust civilization, but this left the west uniquely vulnerable to the cheap production of propaganda. Lies are cheap/Truth Expensive.

    And the many who lied by propaganda, pseudoscience, and pseudo-rationalism, as a means of destroying that high trust civilization could do so because it is simply too expensive to correct a desirable falsehood and too cheap to perpetuate it.

    Thankfully, between archeology, cognitive science, genetics, the results of the world experiment with different forms of government, and the world experiments with different forms of economics, the entire propaganda program of the early and mid 20th century had been ended.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 10:03:00 UTC

  • Positive Freedoms Cannot Exist

    Positive freedoms cannot exist because they force others to bear your costs against their will. Only negative freedoms are equally extensible to all because they ask us NOT to do something. Rights are merely positive expressions of the right to sue for restitution. So it is ‘Freedom FROM’ false, criminal, unethical, and immoral display, word, and deed. In other words, the only moral rule equally extensible to all is RECIPROCITY (exchange). So while the moral person wants freedom of all speech under the assumption others only err, or are victims of their ability and ignorance, the reality is that the industrialization of lying by pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and propaganda in the 20th century has caused damage only equalled by the Abrahamic Dark Age. Westerners have produced the only existing high trust civilization, but this left the west uniquely vulnerable to the cheap production of propaganda. Lies are cheap/Truth Expensive. And the many who lied by propaganda, pseudoscience, and pseudo-rationalism, as a means of destroying that high trust civilization could do so because it is simply too expensive to correct a desirable falsehood and too cheap to perpetuate it. Thankfully, between archeology, cognitive science, genetics, the results of the world experiment with different forms of government, and the world experiments with different forms of economics, the entire propaganda program of the early and mid 20th century had been ended.

  • Positive Freedoms Cannot Exist

    Positive freedoms cannot exist because they force others to bear your costs against their will. Only negative freedoms are equally extensible to all because they ask us NOT to do something. Rights are merely positive expressions of the right to sue for restitution. So it is ‘Freedom FROM’ false, criminal, unethical, and immoral display, word, and deed. In other words, the only moral rule equally extensible to all is RECIPROCITY (exchange). So while the moral person wants freedom of all speech under the assumption others only err, or are victims of their ability and ignorance, the reality is that the industrialization of lying by pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and propaganda in the 20th century has caused damage only equalled by the Abrahamic Dark Age. Westerners have produced the only existing high trust civilization, but this left the west uniquely vulnerable to the cheap production of propaganda. Lies are cheap/Truth Expensive. And the many who lied by propaganda, pseudoscience, and pseudo-rationalism, as a means of destroying that high trust civilization could do so because it is simply too expensive to correct a desirable falsehood and too cheap to perpetuate it. Thankfully, between archeology, cognitive science, genetics, the results of the world experiment with different forms of government, and the world experiments with different forms of economics, the entire propaganda program of the early and mid 20th century had been ended.