Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • INDIVIDUALISM IS A “WEASEL WORD” Sovereignty can be tested by violations of inte

    INDIVIDUALISM IS A “WEASEL WORD”

    Sovereignty can be tested by violations of interests that we categorically refer to as Property in Toto. A man is sovereign or he is not. He can demonstrate reciprocity in sovereignty or the cannot.

    Individualism, like non aggression, is just a weasel word for not defining the scope of interests against which one cannot impose costs, and the institutional means by which such a condition is created and preserved, against competition from those with different intentions.

    Sovereignty is an empirically testable definition. Individualism is just a means of weaseling out of a testable definition and thereby preserving means of deception.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-14 09:34:00 UTC

  • It’s not complicated: RIGHT = RECIPROCITY (TRADE) -vs- LEFT = EQUALITY (THEFT)

    It’s not complicated: RIGHT = RECIPROCITY (TRADE) -vs- LEFT = EQUALITY (THEFT)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-13 15:19:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1006918877903818752

  • It’s not complicated: RIGHT = RECIPROCITY (TRADE) -vs- LEFT = EQUALITY (THEFT)

    It’s not complicated: RIGHT = RECIPROCITY (TRADE) -vs- LEFT = EQUALITY (THEFT)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-13 11:19:00 UTC

  • “Slaughter your sacred cows because the growing market demand is for rule of law

    —“Slaughter your sacred cows because the growing market demand is for rule of law by natural law, reciprocity, order, a competent militia willing to implement incremental suppression of parasitism, and nature (god). The gods (forces of nature) can no longer tolerate lies (superstition, ignorance, bias, deceit, wishful thinking, pseudoscience, parasitism, and theft). Religion is for peasants, truth is for sovereign men and the demand for them is growing.”— Curtus Maximus (who’s real name i do not know)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 22:01:00 UTC

  • Any Sufficiently Complex Theory Will Be Indistinguishable from Magic

    —“Most people won’t understand the basis for [the Propertarian] legal theory, and it will need explanation in mythological terms. To the people who require this form of explanation it will essentially be a religion.”– Eric Orwoll You know, sometimes you just need someone to reframe it for you. Thanks Eric. That’s smart. You could ahve told me that three years ago and saved me six months… lol

  • Debt Relationships Are the Sources of Duties

    by Zachary Miller Relationships between persons are the sources of a person’s duties. A parent has duties to a child by virtue of their natural relationship to one another. And the adult is identified as a parent by virtue of their duties to the child, as people are rather defined by their duties to others. A debtor similarly has duties to a creditor by virtue of their relationship in contract. And the debtor is defined by his duty to pay his debts. And a tortfeasor has duties to his victim by virtue of their relationship in tort. And the tortfeasor is defined by his duty to make restitution.

  • Debt Relationships Are the Sources of Duties

    by Zachary Miller Relationships between persons are the sources of a person’s duties. A parent has duties to a child by virtue of their natural relationship to one another. And the adult is identified as a parent by virtue of their duties to the child, as people are rather defined by their duties to others. A debtor similarly has duties to a creditor by virtue of their relationship in contract. And the debtor is defined by his duty to pay his debts. And a tortfeasor has duties to his victim by virtue of their relationship in tort. And the tortfeasor is defined by his duty to make restitution.

  • “The kind of man is defined by the kinds of duties he possesses. The quality of

    —“The kind of man is defined by the kinds of duties he possesses. The quality of man is defined by the quality of his performance thereof.”— Zachary Miller


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 11:34:00 UTC

  • DEBT RELATIONSHIPS ARE THE SOURCES OF DUTIES by Zachary Miller Relationships bet

    DEBT RELATIONSHIPS ARE THE SOURCES OF DUTIES

    by Zachary Miller

    Relationships between persons are the sources of a person’s duties.

    A parent has duties to a child by virtue of their natural relationship to one another. And the adult is identified as a parent by virtue of their duties to the child, as people are rather defined by their duties to others.

    A debtor similarly has duties to a creditor by virtue of their relationship in contract. And the debtor is defined by his duty to pay his debts.

    And a tortfeasor has duties to his victim by virtue of their relationship in tort. And the tortfeasor is defined by his duty to make restitution.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 11:24:00 UTC

  • ANY SUFFICIENTLY COMPLEX THEORY WILL BE INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM MAGIC —“Most pe

    ANY SUFFICIENTLY COMPLEX THEORY WILL BE INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM MAGIC

    —“Most people won’t understand the basis for [the Propertarian] legal theory, and it will need explanation in mythological terms. To the people who require this form of explanation it will essentially be a religion.”– Eric Orwoll

    You know, sometimes you just need someone to reframe it for you. Thanks Eric. That’s smart.

    You could ahve told me that three years ago and saved me six months… lol


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 09:32:00 UTC