Ashkenazi Volition independent of externalities. -vs- Western Reciprocity inclusive of externalities.
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
Legal Differences
Ashkenazi Volition independent of externalities. -vs- Western Reciprocity inclusive of externalities.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. EVERY MAN A SHERIFF —“People who, in observ
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
EVERY MAN A SHERIFF
—“People who, in observing a crime in progress, scold civilians for using force to stop it, say “just call the cops, don’t shoot them”. But, at what point of destruction would you still hold that passive view? Would you say just call the fire department if you saw someone about to start a huge brush fire in California or Greece?”— Steve Pender
Every man a craftsman, a sheriff, a judge, a warrior.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 19:36:34 UTC
-
“The problem with “out of the box” (straight from the dealer, no options) Wester
—“The problem with “out of the box” (straight from the dealer, no options) Western Reciprocity Inclusive of Externalities (WRIE), is it needs a dual-morality (in group / out group) module otherwise the range of agency is too narrow (self limited).”—James Santagata
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 21:45:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1023685951837687819
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“The problem with “out of the box” (straig
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
—“The problem with “out of the box” (straight from the dealer, no options) Western Reciprocity Inclusive of Externalities (WRIE), is it needs a dual-morality (in group / out group) module otherwise the range of agency is too narrow (self limited).”—James Santagata
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 21:45:15 UTC
-
LEGAL DIFFERENCES Ashkenazi Volition independent of externalities. -vs- Western
LEGAL DIFFERENCES
Ashkenazi Volition independent of externalities.
-vs-
Western Reciprocity inclusive of externalities.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 20:26:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1023666121432592386
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. LEGAL DIFFERENCES Ashkenazi Volition independ
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
LEGAL DIFFERENCES
Ashkenazi Volition independent of externalities.
-vs-
Western Reciprocity inclusive of externalities.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 20:26:25 UTC
-
Do Natural Rights Exist? No. but We Can Create Them
1 – There exists a natural law (necessity), and that is non-imposition (reciprocity, sovereignty). We do not have a choice in this. It is the product of physical universe, and the necessity of a species capable of the pursuit of self interest as well as cooperation in that self interest. 2 – That necessity of natural law can be expressed positively (usefully) as a collection of rights of appeal to a court (insurer) of natural law (reciprocity, sovereignty). 3 – In that sense, we can attempt to violate natural law, or we can attempt to construct natural rights (defenses of reciprocity). While courts of the common (natural) law of tort attempt to construct natural rights under rule of law, the state attempts (constantly) to violate that natural law by the construction of legislation that violates the natural law of reciprocity. 4 – Natural rights do not exist, but instead, natural rights (specific insurances of sovereignty) are something we can seek to create through legislation (contract), that is then enforced by the courts (insurer). 5 – Natural Rights are not something that exists without our creation of them under the natural law of non-imposition, reciprocity, sovereignty. The are merely something we desire to produce within the natural law of reciprocity, as specific guarantees of those instances of property: life, liberty, property, and interests in the multitude of physical, normative, traditional, and institutional commons.
-
Do Natural Rights Exist? No. but We Can Create Them
1 – There exists a natural law (necessity), and that is non-imposition (reciprocity, sovereignty). We do not have a choice in this. It is the product of physical universe, and the necessity of a species capable of the pursuit of self interest as well as cooperation in that self interest. 2 – That necessity of natural law can be expressed positively (usefully) as a collection of rights of appeal to a court (insurer) of natural law (reciprocity, sovereignty). 3 – In that sense, we can attempt to violate natural law, or we can attempt to construct natural rights (defenses of reciprocity). While courts of the common (natural) law of tort attempt to construct natural rights under rule of law, the state attempts (constantly) to violate that natural law by the construction of legislation that violates the natural law of reciprocity. 4 – Natural rights do not exist, but instead, natural rights (specific insurances of sovereignty) are something we can seek to create through legislation (contract), that is then enforced by the courts (insurer). 5 – Natural Rights are not something that exists without our creation of them under the natural law of non-imposition, reciprocity, sovereignty. The are merely something we desire to produce within the natural law of reciprocity, as specific guarantees of those instances of property: life, liberty, property, and interests in the multitude of physical, normative, traditional, and institutional commons.
-
“The problem with “out of the box” (straight from the dealer, no options) Wester
—“The problem with “out of the box” (straight from the dealer, no options) Western Reciprocity Inclusive of Externalities (WRIE), is it needs a dual-morality (in group / out group) module otherwise the range of agency is too narrow (self limited).”—James Santagata
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 17:45:00 UTC