—“Slaughter your sacred cows because the growing market demand is for rule of law by natural law, reciprocity, order, a competent militia willing to implement incremental suppression of parasitism, and nature (god). The gods (forces of nature) can no longer tolerate lies (superstition, ignorance, bias, deceit, wishful thinking, pseudoscience, parasitism, and theft). Religion is for peasants, truth is for sovereign men and the demand for them is growing.”— Curtus Maximus (who’s real name i do not know)
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
“Slaughter your sacred cows because the growing market demand is for rule of law
-
It’s not complicated.
It’s not complicated: RIGHT = RECIPROCITY (TRADE) -vs- LEFT = EQUALITY (THEFT) Right Reciprocity and Loyalty (male aristocratic) Left Equality and Devotion (female, underclass)
-
It’s not complicated.
It’s not complicated: RIGHT = RECIPROCITY (TRADE) -vs- LEFT = EQUALITY (THEFT) Right Reciprocity and Loyalty (male aristocratic) Left Equality and Devotion (female, underclass)
-
Natural Law vs Social Construct
by John Mark “Xyz is a social construct” carries no testable content. What they mean to say is “Human groups don’t actually need xyz to be successful. People have told us we need xyz but we would be better off without it.” Insert “legislation” or “rule of law based on natural law of reciprocity” for “xyz” and we have a testable statement. As far as I know, rule of law based on natural law of reciprocity with full accounting (of all forms of property) can and would adapt to social conditions – meaning that regardless of what actions people are taking in a polity, such a system of law would provide legal recourse and restitution for individuals or groups who experienced others violating reciprocity in dealings with them.
-
Natural Law vs Social Construct
by John Mark “Xyz is a social construct” carries no testable content. What they mean to say is “Human groups don’t actually need xyz to be successful. People have told us we need xyz but we would be better off without it.” Insert “legislation” or “rule of law based on natural law of reciprocity” for “xyz” and we have a testable statement. As far as I know, rule of law based on natural law of reciprocity with full accounting (of all forms of property) can and would adapt to social conditions – meaning that regardless of what actions people are taking in a polity, such a system of law would provide legal recourse and restitution for individuals or groups who experienced others violating reciprocity in dealings with them.
-
All we ask in propertarianism is to impose reciprocity by violence as a means of
All we ask in propertarianism is to impose reciprocity by violence as a means of restitution.
In other words, we only act to restore natural law.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-20 10:53:00 UTC
-
“People have lost sight of the origin and purpose of tolerance and secularism, t
—“People have lost sight of the origin and purpose of tolerance and secularism, to reduce conflict between parties willing to reciprocate a minimum level of basic respect, and have universalized it into an absolute principle. But all principles are valid only within limits.”— Eli Harman
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-20 08:50:00 UTC
-
“The problem is not that American is the worlds police, the problem is that the
—“The problem is not that American is the worlds police, the problem is that the world refuses to pay for the service. A lack of reciprocity.”—Noah J Revoy
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-16 21:03:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1030198442285588481
-
It Begins with The Oath
Oath(Contract) > Reciprocity > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Violence > Markets > Non Parasitic Order. You must make an oath to produce reciprocity; if you produce reciprocity you will as a consequence produce sovereignty; if you produce sovereignty, decisions are only decidable by natural law, and only enforceable by violence – the sum total of which results in markets, and because of markets, the result is a non-parasitic order.
-
It Begins with The Oath
Oath(Contract) > Reciprocity > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Violence > Markets > Non Parasitic Order. You must make an oath to produce reciprocity; if you produce reciprocity you will as a consequence produce sovereignty; if you produce sovereignty, decisions are only decidable by natural law, and only enforceable by violence – the sum total of which results in markets, and because of markets, the result is a non-parasitic order.