Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • 9) One is not liable for his intentions but for his consequences. One acts given

    9) One is not liable for his intentions but for his consequences. One acts given the resources available(means), the institutions available (opportunity) to produce reciprocity (meritocracy) and therefore continuous eugenic evolution (survival from competition) or the opposite.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 13:22:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055449542328487936

    Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055224404764999680


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Jonas_Ceika

    @curtdoolittle @WorMartiN You also end by saying one should study law, not literature. First off, I don’t study literature. Secondly, how is that an argument? And how is if Marx is liable for murder at all relevant to my points? I’m genuinely confused.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055224404764999680

  • “Q: DEFINE PARASITISM?”— PARASITISM: Violation of Reciprocity by the impositio

    —“Q: DEFINE PARASITISM?”—

    PARASITISM: Violation of Reciprocity by the imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by non physical means: free riding, socialization of losses/privatization of commons, fraud in its host of forms, rent seeking, conspiracy (statism) etc.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 08:34:00 UTC

  • EXPLAINING RECIPROCITY TO A NEWB —“…If I see someone being raped, but do not

    EXPLAINING RECIPROCITY TO A NEWB

    —“…If I see someone being raped, but do nothing to help….”—

    Then by law, “You failed to remove the bad”.

    Incremental Suppression: the discovery and canonization of ‘bads’ (violations of reciprocity) by use of the one law of reciprocity (tort), the jury, and an independent professional judiciary, provides the most rapid means possible of continuous incremental suppressions of free riding, parasitism, and predation

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity: the demand for Productive, Fully Informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests (property), Free of Imposition of Costs upon the Demonstrated Interests (property) of others by externality.

    Remove the bad: Every man a warrior, sheriff, juror, legislator of the one natural law of reciprocity.

    |WESTERN CIVILIZATION| Transcendence (Evolutionary Velocity) via Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, The judiciary of the natural law, and the consequential markets in everything. Where there the militia constitutions a private partnership and there is no state to perform the function of insurer of last resort, every man demonstrates reciprocity by performing the function of insurer of last resort.

    —“Youโ€™re conflating โ€œgoodโ€”—

    Anything that is not bad is good. Bads can be known. The preferential, the good (reciprocal preferential), are preferences. Whether they are preference or good is an opinion. Whether they are ‘bad’ and a violation of reciprocity is not an opinion. It is a fact (by Logical Necessity).

    —“Sacrifices”–

    No animal, including humans, demonstrates altruism, only kin selection, option buying, status acquisition (opportunity gain and discount), and reciprocity (debt) payment against status loss (and therefore opportunity loss). We cast this self interest as virtuous in order to acquire more of such behavior by grant of status to heroic display.

    —“…being good…”—

    Man is, by all evidence, amoral – preying upon or cooperating with as suits his self interest. Given a long time frame, it is in one’s self interest to cooperate because of the outsized returns on cooperation versus predation and boycott. One is ‘virtuous’ because all ‘virtues’ decrease the opportunity costs of cooperation and provide discounts on those higher returns. The fact that we attribute status (pay for with opportunity discounts [trust, recommendation, referrals], is merely compensation (investment) in the production of reciprocity by those with most evidence of it.

    QUOD ERAT DEMONSTRANDUM

    I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job.

    ๐Ÿ˜‰ lol


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 08:27:00 UTC

  • NO, WE’RE FRUSTRATED THAT WE CAN’T SOLVE THE PROBLEM WITH A ONE-TIME COST —“Yo

    NO, WE’RE FRUSTRATED THAT WE CAN’T SOLVE THE PROBLEM WITH A ONE-TIME COST

    —“You’re mad because you have to take basic security measures for your family and property?”— Joseph Michael (Proletarian)

    Actually, we’re frustrated why we can’t just eliminate the reasons for having to take basic security measures – and remain distinct from second and third world countries. We never had to do that before. Most of us never had to lock our homes or cars, or worry if we dropped our wallets they’d be ‘found and taken’. Why should we pay those costs of self defense constantly, instead of paying the cost of deportation? Security is an ongoing cost, and deportation (or capital punishment for that matter) is a one-time-cost, and those one-time costs were extremely beneficial for our ancestors. I mean, there no reason not to return to taking advantage of the local oak tree.

    Economics in everything:

    – Every Property Owner a Sheriff.

    – Using Extra-Judicial Punishment.

    – Stand Your Ground Doctrine.

    – Castle Doctrine.

    – Zero Tolerance

    ๐Ÿ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-23 14:48:00 UTC

  • Q: How Can I Learn About Propertarianism or Natural Law?

    October 22nd, 2018 11:44 AM Q: HOW CAN I LEARN ABOUT PROPERTARIANISM OR NATURAL LAW?

    —“I’m interested in learning about your stance on propertarianism. So, how do you define the natural law? It’s something I’ve been searching and curious about for some time. And how does Propertarianism relate to this? In fact, I’m curious about the whole thing to be honest”— A Friend

    1 – FIRST QUESTION: WHAT IS NATURAL LAW? What is Natural Law? Reciprocity. propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/what-is-natural-law-what-is-reciprocity/ For Christians, Natural Law in Your Context. propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/natural-law-for-christians/ Natural Law Results in Market “Fascism”. propertarianism.com/2018/07/17/natural-law-facism-market-fascism/ West Developed Natural Law To Profit From Domestication of Man (Eugenics). propertarianism.com/2018/06/27/natural-law-of-sovereign-men-domesticating-animal-man-for-peers-and-profit/ Is Natural Law a Cult? (a Cult of The Law?) (it’s a cult of sovereignty) propertarianism.com/2018/06/16/is-natural-law-a-cult/ It’s Natural Law “Fundamentalism” (“The White Law”) propertarianism.com/2018/05/13/natural-law-fundamentalism/ It’s a Cult of Sovereignty Enforced by Law propertarianism.com/2018/04/14/the-cult-of-sovereignty-natural-law/ Why I Write Natural Law and Science Not Philosophy propertarianism.com/2018/02/25/why-i-write-natural-law-science-not-philosophy-choice/ Each of those posts is pretty short. Read in order, you’ll mostly ‘get’ it. Sometimes you have to read through those posts a few times. But it’s not that hard. You will understand. 2 – SECOND QUESTION: How does propertarianism relate to natural law? It’s the application of natural law to all fields of inquiry (the scope of human knowledge). The scope of work would better be named “The Natural Law of Sovereign Men“, or just “Natural Law“. However, I solved ‘ethics’ first, and the name for that ethics is ‘propertarianism’. So we ‘stuck with propertarianism’ simply because of name recognition. The Scope of Propertarianism (or whatever you choose to call it: “Natural Law“, or “Natural Law of Sovereign Men“, or “The White Law” or the “Philosophy of Western Civilization” ): propertarianism.com/2018/06/02/the-scope-of-propertarianism-natural-law/3 – THIRD QUESTION: THE OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY: An overview of the content of Propertarianism. propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/

  • Q: How Can I Learn About Propertarianism or Natural Law?

    October 22nd, 2018 11:44 AM Q: HOW CAN I LEARN ABOUT PROPERTARIANISM OR NATURAL LAW?

    —“I’m interested in learning about your stance on propertarianism. So, how do you define the natural law? It’s something I’ve been searching and curious about for some time. And how does Propertarianism relate to this? In fact, I’m curious about the whole thing to be honest”— A Friend

    1 – FIRST QUESTION: WHAT IS NATURAL LAW? What is Natural Law? Reciprocity. propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/what-is-natural-law-what-is-reciprocity/ For Christians, Natural Law in Your Context. propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/natural-law-for-christians/ Natural Law Results in Market “Fascism”. propertarianism.com/2018/07/17/natural-law-facism-market-fascism/ West Developed Natural Law To Profit From Domestication of Man (Eugenics). propertarianism.com/2018/06/27/natural-law-of-sovereign-men-domesticating-animal-man-for-peers-and-profit/ Is Natural Law a Cult? (a Cult of The Law?) (it’s a cult of sovereignty) propertarianism.com/2018/06/16/is-natural-law-a-cult/ It’s Natural Law “Fundamentalism” (“The White Law”) propertarianism.com/2018/05/13/natural-law-fundamentalism/ It’s a Cult of Sovereignty Enforced by Law propertarianism.com/2018/04/14/the-cult-of-sovereignty-natural-law/ Why I Write Natural Law and Science Not Philosophy propertarianism.com/2018/02/25/why-i-write-natural-law-science-not-philosophy-choice/ Each of those posts is pretty short. Read in order, you’ll mostly ‘get’ it. Sometimes you have to read through those posts a few times. But it’s not that hard. You will understand. 2 – SECOND QUESTION: How does propertarianism relate to natural law? It’s the application of natural law to all fields of inquiry (the scope of human knowledge). The scope of work would better be named “The Natural Law of Sovereign Men“, or just “Natural Law“. However, I solved ‘ethics’ first, and the name for that ethics is ‘propertarianism’. So we ‘stuck with propertarianism’ simply because of name recognition. The Scope of Propertarianism (or whatever you choose to call it: “Natural Law“, or “Natural Law of Sovereign Men“, or “The White Law” or the “Philosophy of Western Civilization” ): propertarianism.com/2018/06/02/the-scope-of-propertarianism-natural-law/3 – THIRD QUESTION: THE OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY: An overview of the content of Propertarianism. propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/

  • HOW CAN I LEARN ABOUT PROPERTARIANISM OR NATURAL LAW? —“I’m interested in lear

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/what-is-natural-law-what-is-reciprocity/Q: HOW CAN I LEARN ABOUT PROPERTARIANISM OR NATURAL LAW?

    —“I’m interested in learning about your stance on propertarianism. So, how do you define the natural law? It’s something I’ve been searching and curious about for some time. And how does Propertarianism relate to this? In fact, I’m curious about the whole thing to be honest”— A Friend

    1 – FIRST QUESTION: WHAT IS NATURAL LAW?

    What is Natural Law? Reciprocity.

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/what-is-natural-law-what-is-reciprocity/

    For Christians, Natural Law in Your Context.

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/natural-law-for-christians/

    Natural Law Results in Market “Fascism”.

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/07/17/natural-law-facism-market-fascism/

    West Developed Natural Law To Profit From Domestication of Man (Eugenics).

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/06/27/natural-law-of-sovereign-men-domesticating-animal-man-for-peers-and-profit/

    Is Natural Law a Cult? (a Cult of The Law?)

    (it’s a cult of sovereignty)

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/06/16/is-natural-law-a-cult/

    It’s Natural Law “Fundamentalism” (“The White Law”)

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/13/natural-law-fundamentalism/

    It’s a Cult of Sovereignty Enforced by Law

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/04/14/the-cult-of-sovereignty-natural-law/

    WHY I WRITE NATURAL LAW AND SCIENCE NOT PHILOSOPHY

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/02/25/why-i-write-natural-law-science-not-philosophy-choice/

    Each of those posts is pretty short. Read in order, you’ll mostly ‘get’ it. Sometimes you have to read through those posts a few times. But it’s not that hard. You will understand.

    2 – SECOND QUESTION:

    How does propertarianism relate to natural law? It’s the application of natural law to all fields of inquiry (the scope of human knowledge).

    The scope of work would better be named “The Natural Law of Sovereign Men”, or just “Natural Law”. However, i solved ‘ethics’ first, and the name for that ethics is ‘propertarianism’. So we ‘stuck with propertarianism’ simply because of name recognition.

    The Scope of Propertarianism (or whatever you choose to call it: “Natural Law”, or “Natural Law of Sovereign Men”, or “The White Law” or the “hHilosophy of Western Civilization” ):

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/06/02/the-scope-of-propertarianism-natural-law/

    3 – THIRD QUESTION: THE OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY: An overview of the content of Propertarianism.

    https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 11:44:00 UTC

  • It’s a Bit Like Studying for A STEM+L Degree

    October 21st, 2018 12:35 PM UNDERSTANDING PROPERTARIANISM IS A BIT LIKE STUDYING FOR A STEM+L DEGREE. THAT’S WHY IT TAKES TIME. IT’S NON-TRIVIAL.

    —“I’m having a hard time understanding propertarianism tbh. I’m reading your articles on the website but still….what should I do?:— Ayham Nedal

    [O]ur Reading List helps with general knowledge so that you can tell we know what we’re talking about. Propertarianism consists of a broad set of concepts that produce a logic and science of social science in all its uses. We draw terms and ideas from math to logic to philosophy to law to economics to the sciences. And it’s because we do so, that we were able to UNITE THE SCIENCES into a SINGLE LANGUAGE consistent across all of them, thereby eliminating the silos, and allowing us to identify the falsehoods or imprecisions in each of them. So we include books on every major subject in social science. The Introductions to Propertarianism are very helpful. They are: The CONCEPTS: 1) https://propertarianinstitute.com/basic-concepts/ (Which I should fill out a bit more if I get some time) AND THE CORE 2) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/ Libertarianism (Mises, Hayek, Haslitt, Rothbard, Hoppe), tried very hard to unite social science, economics, law, and politics but they were not successful. However, if you understand libertarianism, Ely Harman’s introduction is very helpful in helping with the transition. We probably should write a transition document for the Dark Enlightenment folk (Moldbug), and for Classical Liberals, and for Fascists. But we have only so much time…. HISTORY The cycles of history, and the competition between the Western (Science/Law), Asian (military/political), and Semitic (Religion,Mythology), is something almost anyone can understand. The secret to the west is easy to understand (computational velocity by sovereignty, reciprocity, natural law, markets in everything).. MANKIND The Acquisitionism (psychology), Propertarianism (ethics), and the Class System, and Perfect Government, are not difficult. but require learning some precise terms. This is harder than it should be in my opinion and I don’t know why it’s difficult. It’s just training yourself to categorize by property rather than moral norms. LOGIC Testimonialism (grammars, logic, scientific speech, and the geometry of meaning) is extremely challenging if you do not have experience in philosophy of science, math, and logic. and writing arguments in natural law (balanced transactions) takes quite a bit of practice. This is hard. But, it’s the entire basis of the program. Because it is the completion of the scientifc method that’s based upon testimonialism, and our ability to suppress fraud and deceit in the commons (political speech) is dependent upon encoding Testimonialism (a checklist of due diligences) into the law. IT’S BIG This is a bigger scope of work than Marxism. So we cover the entire spectrum of metaphysics, psychology, testimony (truth), ethics, sociology, politics, law, group evolutionary strategy, and war. Lastly, just ASK US. if I don’t answer, someone else will. We KNOW that we have to make a course for it. The course outline is already on the site. But without the book(s) it is not going to be easily taught. So everyone (me included) is waiting on me to finish – and it’s killing me…. lol.

  • Man: Known as In Self Deceptions or Known as In Demonstrated Actions (truth)?

    October 21st, 2018 1:36 PM MAN: KNOWN AS IN SELF DECEPTIONS OR KNOWN AS IN DEMONSTRATED ACTIONS (TRUTH)?

    —“If Propertarianism is grounded solely on science and not religion, then on what basis is Man (with a great M) known?”—Josef Kalinin

    Joseph : I can’t decompose that question. Man ‘is’, (exists as) that which he has demonstrated by his history. the stories (sedations) we tell ourselves at any point in history, merely serve to ameliorate our instincts (largely status) in relation to our resources (physical, emotional, mental) budges, and existential resources in all their forms – from physical things to relationships to knowledge. So are you asking “What is man?”, or “What methods of sedation (self medication) has man used through history?” Propertarianism ‘accounts for’ (takes account of): Math, Logic, Science (Physics-Chemistry-Biology, Psychology, Law, Economics, History, Literature, Philosophy, Religion, The Occult, the Fictionalisms, and Methods of Deceit. What it most takes account of, and no others do, is the transition of our understanding, knowledge and instrumentation from human scale to pre (supra/below) and post (super/above) human scale. And as such at humans scale (Morality, Instructions, arithmetic(construction),confirmation) we speak in justifications (Via-Positivas) because we can directly apprehend such constant relations, where at below and above human scale (Law, Science, Mathematics(deduction), Falsification) we speak in falsifications (Via-Negativas) because we cannot directly perceive those constant relations with our senses. The world wars (Anglo/Balance and Russian/Expansion Screw Ups) interrupted the darwinian-mengerian-specerian-maxwellian-poincarian-nietzschiean-romanticist revolution. And the 20th century in social science was lost, as the cult-of-dysgenic-socialism found itself in a christ figure versus a darwinian evil of eugenic-national-socialism, which allowed the suppression of the second scientific revolution (in germany). But beginning in the 1990’s science has (slowly) rescued us such that without immigration we would have corrected the problem already.

  • Man: Known as In Self Deceptions or Known as In Demonstrated Actions (truth)?

    October 21st, 2018 1:36 PM MAN: KNOWN AS IN SELF DECEPTIONS OR KNOWN AS IN DEMONSTRATED ACTIONS (TRUTH)?

    —“If Propertarianism is grounded solely on science and not religion, then on what basis is Man (with a great M) known?”—Josef Kalinin

    Joseph : I can’t decompose that question. Man ‘is’, (exists as) that which he has demonstrated by his history. the stories (sedations) we tell ourselves at any point in history, merely serve to ameliorate our instincts (largely status) in relation to our resources (physical, emotional, mental) budges, and existential resources in all their forms – from physical things to relationships to knowledge. So are you asking “What is man?”, or “What methods of sedation (self medication) has man used through history?” Propertarianism ‘accounts for’ (takes account of): Math, Logic, Science (Physics-Chemistry-Biology, Psychology, Law, Economics, History, Literature, Philosophy, Religion, The Occult, the Fictionalisms, and Methods of Deceit. What it most takes account of, and no others do, is the transition of our understanding, knowledge and instrumentation from human scale to pre (supra/below) and post (super/above) human scale. And as such at humans scale (Morality, Instructions, arithmetic(construction),confirmation) we speak in justifications (Via-Positivas) because we can directly apprehend such constant relations, where at below and above human scale (Law, Science, Mathematics(deduction), Falsification) we speak in falsifications (Via-Negativas) because we cannot directly perceive those constant relations with our senses. The world wars (Anglo/Balance and Russian/Expansion Screw Ups) interrupted the darwinian-mengerian-specerian-maxwellian-poincarian-nietzschiean-romanticist revolution. And the 20th century in social science was lost, as the cult-of-dysgenic-socialism found itself in a christ figure versus a darwinian evil of eugenic-national-socialism, which allowed the suppression of the second scientific revolution (in germany). But beginning in the 1990’s science has (slowly) rescued us such that without immigration we would have corrected the problem already.