Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553030181 Timestamp) ON REQUEST: THE NATUAL LAW ON PEDOPHELLIA –“I’d like to see you make a post on pædophilia. You smash every issue and I think this deserves attention. It’s not a waste of your time if you’re educating the whole following, not just me.”— Thanks for asking. This isn’t really a difficult question. And I might have to edit this abit for additional clarity, but here it is: –The Judgement of Natural Law on Paedophilla.– WHEREAS

    1. Definition
      … a) A paraphilia: Paraphilia is the experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, fantasies, behaviors, or individuals. Such attraction may be labeled sexual fetishism. No consensus has been found for any precise border between unusual sexual interests and paraphilic ones. There is debate over which, if any, of the paraphilias should be listed in diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases.

    … b) Pedophillia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for pre-pubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia. The criteria therefore is: … i) obsessive or exclusive interest … ii) in those under 13 years of age, and or the degree of development we attribute to those under 13 years of age. … iii) by those 16 years of age or older … iv) and at least five years older.

    1. Limits
      These are NOT evidence of pedophilia:
      … a) photos of nude babies or children in one’s own family as documentation of the beauty of life.
      … b) There is a long standing artistic tradition in western civilization of the nude form including that of the young. The difference between beauty, innocence, and virginity (promise of future fertility) and sexuality (opportunity in the present for consumption) is not a difficult one to judge by triangulation with traditional works of art. If there is a question there is no question.
      … b) taking care of one’s own kin’s hygiene or taking one’s own kin to public toilets or changing rooms or other private places as is required of all of us. The conflation of male and female responsibilities in these matters has not helped us because it exposes ordinary men to unwarranted risk of false accusation.
      … c) protecting, disciplining, educating, praising, talking to, amusing, or playing with children – which may include physical contact.
      … d) incest – incest is a different crime – one of availability.
      … e) natural experimentation between pubescents.
      … f) natural aesthetic attraction to the beauty of those who are fertile if not yet fully mature enough to make rational decisions regarding the commitments of reproduction and offspring.
      … g) As a general rule male female ratio of Male Age, then divided by two, then add seven, produces limits to non-coercieve relationships from 14 onward. Below 14, more than one year of difference is outside the limit.

    2. Evidence
      … a) consumption of child pornography
      … b) obsession in attention, speech, collection
      … b) molestation
      … c) co-morbidity
      … … deficits in response inhibition,
      … … smaller stature, left handedness, frontal development.
      … … failed lateralization (ie: the’re feminine)
      … … personality disorders (increase risk of acting)

    3. Causes
      “Brain Damage.” Current understanding is an in-utero attack on fetus and fetal proteins – particularly male – which prohibit development, giving more miscarriages, birth to lighter weight and smaller offspring. (CD: future research will undoubtedly show that this process is far more vast in affect than just sexual development. I have seen no and expect to see no, variation on this general theme other than mother’s genetic predisposition to produce this immune response.)
      … a) in-utero developmental defects (Potential)
      … b) developmental trauma (Trigger)
      … c) brain trauma (Trigger)

    4. Incurability
      The defect is incurable because the developmental phase of the brain cannot be recreated. It is possible to use CBT to train certain low risk individuals but even this evidence is limited. (Important:) The individual lacks executive function necessary to suppress the underdeveloped and obsessive urges.

    AND WHEREAS; … a) Non-Reciprocal – violates voluntary reciprocity … b) Harmful – violates imposition of harm … d) Externality – produces vast externalities … d) UnRestitutable – restitution is impossible … e) Unstoppable – violates demand for cessation, placing the burden on the court: … … Because the Law must: … … … Provide restitution … … … Provide punishment … … … Prevent repetition or expansion THEREFORE; It is the judgment of the law that:

    1. Pedophilia is an incurable defect, not disease.
    2. Pedophiliacs cause harm closed to restitution
    3. To those incapable of self defense,
    4. And unable to engage in reciprocity,
    5. Producing extraordinary (Vast) externalities for parental behavior in defense of children which increases with transportation rates, anonymity, and population density.
    6. false accusation is:
      … a) harmful to the accused
      … b) exposes the accused to risk of death
      … c) produces vast externalities whether or not true
      … d) is closed to restitution

    AND THEREFORE; Pedophiles who signal risk, by: … a) manifesting obsessive risk behaviors (watching, stalking, talking) … b) possession of, use of, or creation of, child pornography … c) molestation … d) association with one another … e) conspiracy to engage in any of the above Shall be permanently removed from the population by: … i) death by burning for molestation … i) death by hanging for all other violations … ii) permanent, irrevocable isolation in hard labor prisons (camps) And; Whereas; … i) no judge nor jury nor polity may warranty the others in society from this harm; Therefore; … i) no legislation or regulation of finding of law may circumvent this natural law whether in in act or consequence. … ii) and any who speak of, propose, author, or adjudicate such shall be held liable for consequence. AND WHEREAS, CONVERSELY ; THEREFORE … a) the court shall use harshest possible publishment in the punishment of false accusers, and the highest possible restitution. ensuring that the false accuser’s quality of life is reduced to half that of the falsely accused. –This is the Law– –March 19, 2019– –COMMENTS– by James Fox Higgins The beauty of this piece of law is that: Anyone with a mild perversion but some retention of agency will NOT commit the crime, because the punishment dis-incentivises it so severely. So those who DO harm children in this manner are literally doing it because they have NO agency or self-control, which makes them, by definition, an uncontrollable cost to society. If they recognise their own lack of agency, they can turn themselves in and serve the community from isolation. If not… feel the flames.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553015790 Timestamp) There is only one existentially possible equality and that is reciprocity. The rest is proportionality. And it is an endemic cognitive bias by which we conflate the two.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553032839 Timestamp) FAITH IN MY FELLOW MAN TO PREFER A MORAL LAW I have sufficient faith in the average man that he will prefer to work a little at understanding an absolutely positively moral law closed to abuse and deceit and manipulation, to the existing order of immoral law that he cannot learn, makes little sense, and provides less justice. 😉

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553030181 Timestamp) ON REQUEST: THE NATUAL LAW ON PEDOPHELLIA –“I’d like to see you make a post on pædophilia. You smash every issue and I think this deserves attention. It’s not a waste of your time if you’re educating the whole following, not just me.”— Thanks for asking. This isn’t really a difficult question. And I might have to edit this abit for additional clarity, but here it is: –The Judgement of Natural Law on Paedophilla.– WHEREAS

    1. Definition
      … a) A paraphilia: Paraphilia is the experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, fantasies, behaviors, or individuals. Such attraction may be labeled sexual fetishism. No consensus has been found for any precise border between unusual sexual interests and paraphilic ones. There is debate over which, if any, of the paraphilias should be listed in diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases.

    … b) Pedophillia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for pre-pubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia. The criteria therefore is: … i) obsessive or exclusive interest … ii) in those under 13 years of age, and or the degree of development we attribute to those under 13 years of age. … iii) by those 16 years of age or older … iv) and at least five years older.

    1. Limits
      These are NOT evidence of pedophilia:
      … a) photos of nude babies or children in one’s own family as documentation of the beauty of life.
      … b) There is a long standing artistic tradition in western civilization of the nude form including that of the young. The difference between beauty, innocence, and virginity (promise of future fertility) and sexuality (opportunity in the present for consumption) is not a difficult one to judge by triangulation with traditional works of art. If there is a question there is no question.
      … b) taking care of one’s own kin’s hygiene or taking one’s own kin to public toilets or changing rooms or other private places as is required of all of us. The conflation of male and female responsibilities in these matters has not helped us because it exposes ordinary men to unwarranted risk of false accusation.
      … c) protecting, disciplining, educating, praising, talking to, amusing, or playing with children – which may include physical contact.
      … d) incest – incest is a different crime – one of availability.
      … e) natural experimentation between pubescents.
      … f) natural aesthetic attraction to the beauty of those who are fertile if not yet fully mature enough to make rational decisions regarding the commitments of reproduction and offspring.
      … g) As a general rule male female ratio of Male Age, then divided by two, then add seven, produces limits to non-coercieve relationships from 14 onward. Below 14, more than one year of difference is outside the limit.

    2. Evidence
      … a) consumption of child pornography
      … b) obsession in attention, speech, collection
      … b) molestation
      … c) co-morbidity
      … … deficits in response inhibition,
      … … smaller stature, left handedness, frontal development.
      … … failed lateralization (ie: the’re feminine)
      … … personality disorders (increase risk of acting)

    3. Causes
      “Brain Damage.” Current understanding is an in-utero attack on fetus and fetal proteins – particularly male – which prohibit development, giving more miscarriages, birth to lighter weight and smaller offspring. (CD: future research will undoubtedly show that this process is far more vast in affect than just sexual development. I have seen no and expect to see no, variation on this general theme other than mother’s genetic predisposition to produce this immune response.)
      … a) in-utero developmental defects (Potential)
      … b) developmental trauma (Trigger)
      … c) brain trauma (Trigger)

    4. Incurability
      The defect is incurable because the developmental phase of the brain cannot be recreated. It is possible to use CBT to train certain low risk individuals but even this evidence is limited. (Important:) The individual lacks executive function necessary to suppress the underdeveloped and obsessive urges.

    AND WHEREAS; … a) Non-Reciprocal – violates voluntary reciprocity … b) Harmful – violates imposition of harm … d) Externality – produces vast externalities … d) UnRestitutable – restitution is impossible … e) Unstoppable – violates demand for cessation, placing the burden on the court: … … Because the Law must: … … … Provide restitution … … … Provide punishment … … … Prevent repetition or expansion THEREFORE; It is the judgment of the law that:

    1. Pedophilia is an incurable defect, not disease.
    2. Pedophiliacs cause harm closed to restitution
    3. To those incapable of self defense,
    4. And unable to engage in reciprocity,
    5. Producing extraordinary (Vast) externalities for parental behavior in defense of children which increases with transportation rates, anonymity, and population density.
    6. false accusation is:
      … a) harmful to the accused
      … b) exposes the accused to risk of death
      … c) produces vast externalities whether or not true
      … d) is closed to restitution

    AND THEREFORE; Pedophiles who signal risk, by: … a) manifesting obsessive risk behaviors (watching, stalking, talking) … b) possession of, use of, or creation of, child pornography … c) molestation … d) association with one another … e) conspiracy to engage in any of the above Shall be permanently removed from the population by: … i) death by burning for molestation … i) death by hanging for all other violations … ii) permanent, irrevocable isolation in hard labor prisons (camps) And; Whereas; … i) no judge nor jury nor polity may warranty the others in society from this harm; Therefore; … i) no legislation or regulation of finding of law may circumvent this natural law whether in in act or consequence. … ii) and any who speak of, propose, author, or adjudicate such shall be held liable for consequence. AND WHEREAS, CONVERSELY ; THEREFORE … a) the court shall use harshest possible publishment in the punishment of false accusers, and the highest possible restitution. ensuring that the false accuser’s quality of life is reduced to half that of the falsely accused. –This is the Law– –March 19, 2019– –COMMENTS– by James Fox Higgins The beauty of this piece of law is that: Anyone with a mild perversion but some retention of agency will NOT commit the crime, because the punishment dis-incentivises it so severely. So those who DO harm children in this manner are literally doing it because they have NO agency or self-control, which makes them, by definition, an uncontrollable cost to society. If they recognise their own lack of agency, they can turn themselves in and serve the community from isolation. If not… feel the flames.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553015790 Timestamp) There is only one existentially possible equality and that is reciprocity. The rest is proportionality. And it is an endemic cognitive bias by which we conflate the two.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553095303 Timestamp) IF YOU TAKE THESE COURSES LAW103 – Foundations: The Method, LAW203 – Application: Opinions, Arguments, and Law LAW213 – Reformation: Human Knowledge Reform LAW303 – Reconstruction (and Constitution) By the end of LAW203 You will be able to construct every significant moral issue of the day in rigorous form just as I posed on Pedophilia yesterday. By the end of LAW213 you will understand ‘what’s wrong’ with all the fields including education, and how to repair them. By the end of LAW303 you will be able to write a constitution for your ‘recommended’ (Preferred) form of government. If you also take HIST106 – The History of the European Peoples you will have the narrative structure to explain why. If you also take ECON103 and ECON203 you will understand economics as a social science such that it is much easier to practice NATURAL LAW. This is a METHODOLOGY. it takes a little practice but the methodology can be taught, such that you can write ‘decisions’ and ‘arguments’ in natural law. (PS: FYI: I have condensed Epistemology and Argument into a single course: Foundations: LAW103/6. This was possible because of the simplification of the method once i put the material into class form.)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553088531 Timestamp) THE NATURAL LAW ON THE SEXES, HOMOSEXUALITY, GAY MARRIAGE, PEDOPHILIA (but not incest) (repost from March 2018) (Note: I write using essay (discussion), argument, and law forms. This is argument form. The law form would include slightly more rigorous outlining, dimensional tests, limits, restitutions and punishments. But the argument would not change.) —“Curt: How should the (ideal) relationship between homosexuals and society exist or be constructed, to make homosexuals experience of society be the best it can be, while also making society’s experience of homosexuals be the best it can be? There are a lot of mixed messages out there… and you actually make sense and can justify why you make sense. I would appreciate your comment.”— Ok, Here is a rough outline of the argument in natural law: GIVEN 1) As far as I know homosexuality is a non-rare in utero developmental disorder. I suspect this current scientific hypothesis to survive – although we might discover the cause is or is not an immune system reaction to testosterone (which it appears to be), and we may discover that it can be limited by natal treatments in the future – it does run in families. 2) If you read enough of my work, you’ll encounter the hypothesis that humans are not only able to adapt intellectually and emotionally to changes but that we can create very different distributions of traits in populations using very small variations in endocrine expression. We can express these by stresses and by selection. The male-vs female physical, and male-vs-female reward systems, and male vs female brain structures included in those distributions. 3) It is unclear whether or not the ability to produce homosexuals of either gender is a necessary consequence of our ability to produce those distributions. And secondly, whether or not the result is harmful or not. (apparently not). the reason being that there is greater value in productivity in service of reproduction than reproduction. 4) It is unclear how much of homosexuality is produced in utero, in early development, and in late development. My understanding at present, is that many sexual identity disorders can occur during development without sufficient physical exercise, and sufficient role play by either gender. (And that is before we account for the hormones in the modern chemical environment.) AND WHEREAS That we incrementally demonstrate our fitness (non parasitism, and productive contribution) by: 1) Forgoing crimes both private and public. 2) Demonstrate payment for the franchise by continuous military/militial/sheriff service. 3) Demonstrating worthiness by self sufficiency by productive contribution, thereby forgoing free riding and parasitism 4) Demonstrate worthiness to the intergenerational polity by marriage and family and the support thereof. 5) Demonstrate worthiness to productivity by the voluntary organization of business and industry. 7) Demonstrate worthiness to the polity by organization of the finance, industry, business, trade, and labor in a territory. 8) Demonstrate worthiness by the correct adjudication of disputes between in and out group members under the natural law of reciprocity. AND WHEREAS 1) That the family is the first demonstration of organizational capacity upon which the intergenerational family is dependent. 2) That families are a costly but necessary contribution to the family, clan, tribe, nation, and polity. 3) That families must work tirelessly to insulate generations from consumptive and hedonistic interests and behaviors. 4) That individuals who do not serve, do not produce families, do not produce businesses or industries, do not manage territories, or do not adjudicate differences under the natural law of property, are at best not harmful, and if engaged in criminal or free riding or parasitic activities are a a dead weight loss to the family, clan, tribe, nation, and polity. THEREFORE 1) Homosexuality is a birth defect, and not voluntary. Women are less sexually dedicated than males. Trauma in women especially can cause homosexuality at any point in life. 2) Anything that occurs between adults in private is a voluntary exchange between them and nothing else. 3) Anything that occurs in public (speech/sound, sight/display, or behavior/action) imposes an involuntary cost upon others. 4) Any speech, display, or action that is contrary to the preservation of the intergenerational investment in the commons, and in particular conspicuous hedonism or conspicuous consumption is damaging to the informational commons, and damaging to those who pay higher costs within it. 5) Marriage is a contract for corporation between a man, a woman, and the polity, for the intergeneration production of offspring, and reciprocal care, and reciprocal insurance. However, this contract consists almost entirely of (a)a transfer of all personal property to community property, (c) a reciprocal grant of power of attorney. (d) reciprocal ownership of offspring until the age of maturity. (e) an implied but unenforced insurance against hardship, infirmity, and old age. This corporation dramatically reduces the cost of household production and maintenance. Without this relationship household costs rise disproportionately and therefore standards of living drop accordingly. (as we have seen) 6) Natural Reproduction and parenting by individual homosexuals by whatever means, and by pairs of homosexuals by whatever means, is difficult to argue with, however any suggestion or influence by such parents that their children’s gender is flexible, that male and female minds and bodies are not different, and that male and female roles in family and society are not necessary, must be prosecuted as a developmental crime on the scale of any other child abuse or torture. 7) Public displays of affection in furtherance of paying the high cost of reproductive persistence, training an intergenerational family, and ensuring that families can produce intra and intergenerational insurance of one another rewards those that so contribute. 8) Public displays of non-reproductive affection shall be limited to those that are demonstrated between heterosexual members of the same sex. 9) Under no condition shall heterosexual and homosexual males be forced into one another’s company. Homosexual males are unfit for military participation by virtue of a birth defect that may hinder trust. 10) Prosecution of homosexual hedonism in any public form shall be vigorous such that it is entirely suppressed. (ie: no more of this public bathroom nonsense and drug use.) CLOSING In other words, the low temporal investment of homosexuals must be removed from visibility in the commons so that there is every incentives for the high intertemporal investment in families. The direction of homosexual relations to the construction of families despite the extraordinary fragility of such families due to the fragility of homosexual relationships, and suppression of public hedonism has proven a successfully means of both reducing public hostility to homosexual behavior and increased the positive signaling behavior of homosexuals. SPECIAL TREATMENT the only special treatment we must give to any behavior in society is that which perpetuates investment in the high cost of producing high investment families. The age of individualism has been a catastrophe for the very reason it was intended to be: to destroy the influence of intergenerational middle and upper middle class families. Just as the ancient attack on the aristocracy was an attack on intergenerational aristocracy. (The Ten Planks were available for all to see.) —MORE— NATURAL LAW ON GENDER https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/06/02/natural-law-on-gender/ TWO GENDERS, MANY DISORDERS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/09/14/two-genders-many-disorders/ NATURAL LAW ON PEDOPHILLIA https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10157059209177264 GAY MARRIAGE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2013/05/31/why-are-gay-people-asking-for-the-right-to-marry-if-it-is-legal-stuff-they-are-asking-for-cant-they-go-to-some-separate-setup-for-partners/

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553102055 Timestamp) THE PRACTICAL DAILY BENEFITS OF PROPERTARIANISM –“Can you explain the value of P for others’ benefit?”– by Moritz Bierling Hehe, I’ve developed much more “oomph” in negotiations of all kind, be they romantic, professional, or otherwise With the aid of a comprehensive framework for assessing what people desire, protect, and defend (Property-in-Toto and Acquisitionism), I can easily understand where they overextend their hand (bluff) or fail to ask for everything they could get within the limits of reciprocity. I can point out benefits accruing to them from my part of the relationship they don’t account for. But perhaps most importantly of all, I can accurately assess what value my skills (and network, ideas, awarenesses) bring to the table, which translates into a confident and relaxed attitude––one that the other party can feel and readily submits to, because they instinctively sense that “I know my shit” and “they can’t fuck with me”. Oh, and another added benefit, perhaps even greater than the above, lies in me not deceiving myself and getting blindsided by an angle I didn’t consider.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553099513 Timestamp) Can you imagine being in a meeting with pretty much anyone who DOESN”T know P, and negotiating or debating with them? it’s almost not fair. ALmost. … 😉

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553099472 Timestamp) THE SUPERPOWER If Philosophy helped you in life and business, The Natural Law will be a superpower by comparison. Yes, its work. But it’s not harder than learning geometry or basic programming as far as I can tell. And other than it’s falsificationary, equilibrating, and reciprocal, rather than ‘justifiationary’ it’s a bit more intuitive. But man. Learning how to convert from justification to falsification, equilibration, and reciprocity is … well, it’s gotta be turned into a habit. And a habit requires repetition. And that means ‘lots of case studies’. Ie: writing lots of law.