Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • That is a Just trade. Men want their offspring to survive because they have no o

    That is a Just trade. Men want their offspring to survive because they have no other choice. Women don’t want the burden of bearing, surrendering to adoption, or caring. If women will not pay to birth them then men should not pay to raise them. That is a reciprocal exchange.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 18:45:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174031716463325184

    Reply addressees: @JaneCaro

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174031347469430785


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JaneCaro But let’s not pretend it’s not murder. It is. It’s just justifiable murder in a woman’s eyes. How about a trade? End alimony and child support in exchange for juridical license to murder before their born, rather than after?Restore man’s choice if we are going to restore woman’s.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174031347469430785


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JaneCaro But let’s not pretend it’s not murder. It is. It’s just justifiable murder in a woman’s eyes. How about a trade? End alimony and child support in exchange for juridical license to murder before their born, rather than after?Restore man’s choice if we are going to restore woman’s.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174031347469430785

  • Give me an example. Language, like violence can be used for true and reciprocal

    Give me an example. Language, like violence can be used for true and reciprocal or false and irreciprocal ends. It is just a resource. So while I work on eliminating falsehood by law I am not sure what you are working on other than association, which is useless for operations.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 21:10:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173705655414403072

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173705056358735872


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Semiogogue

    @curtdoolittle I want the marks in our environment to be reliable as a basis for making behavioral determinations. Like they were in the first place. Before *spoken language* introduced the ambiguity. Once upon a time there was no such ambiguity. https://t.co/R9AQUcUXQA

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173705056358735872

  • They can’t stand the reason why either: Truth regardless of the consequence to t

    They can’t stand the reason why either: Truth regardless of the consequence to the dominance hierarchy; sovereignty and reciprocity in law (tort, trespass) before a jury of peers (impossibility of corruption); and markets (competition) in all walks of life; = optimum velocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-15 19:57:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173324951782330368

    Reply addressees: @JayMan471

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173310634504704001


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JayMan471

    Boy https://t.co/ejwfwxS50V

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173310634504704001

  • Notes for John Mark Interview – Part 3

    So what we see is that it’s not capitalism vs socialism, it’s reciprocity vs parasitism. Law’s job is to suppress all forms of parasitism and thus enforce natural law of reciprocity. In my other vids on Propertarianism I’ve explained the basics of how we can write/design our rule of law to do that better than we do today. But Why is it that enforcing reciprocity (eliminating parasitism) produces wealth and high quality of life?

    It’s Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Non Parasitism, Rule of Law, suppression of demand for authority. (PACK) VS Equality, Proportionality, Parasitism, Rule by Discretion, Demand for authority.(HERD) So yes, the capitalism vs socialism is a false dichotomy that is perhaps the best persistent example of using pilpul and critique to present a straw man argument when all economies must be mixed because defense of the private for the purpose of consumption and the common for the purpose of preservation are two very different things requiring two different kinds of enforcement. We must have markets for association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, elites and their strategies, and polities. Because markets calculate the unknown. Its only backward organizations that can use authority for short periods to adapt (transform) to a new technology using a novel set of incentives. This is the value of executive and states: to reorganize incentives that have calcified. Answering the WHY IS IT…? Question is just (a) we make time through divisions of labor (b) we make more time the faster we identify and capture opportunities. (c.) for increasingly complex goods, services, and information, we produce longer more complex production cycles with more opportunities along the chain, in to more and more organizations in sustainable networks of specialization and trade. We are calculating a way of defeating the dark forces of time and ignorance in a window of opportunity between catastrophic events on a plant that has had a set of what I suspect are rare coincidences. Western man uses maneuver – ooda loops- to move faster than others. That’s it. And law, and markets in all aspects of life favor evolution, eugenics, and prosperity as a method of competitive advantage. And the weak spot in our civilization is that (a) until now it wasn’t codified in a sort of bible of the law, and (b) our women and some portion of our men will always be vulnerable to false promises that evolution and the red queen can be ignored rather than defeated.

  • Notes for John Mark Interview – Part 3

    So what we see is that it’s not capitalism vs socialism, it’s reciprocity vs parasitism. Law’s job is to suppress all forms of parasitism and thus enforce natural law of reciprocity. In my other vids on Propertarianism I’ve explained the basics of how we can write/design our rule of law to do that better than we do today. But Why is it that enforcing reciprocity (eliminating parasitism) produces wealth and high quality of life?

    It’s Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Non Parasitism, Rule of Law, suppression of demand for authority. (PACK) VS Equality, Proportionality, Parasitism, Rule by Discretion, Demand for authority.(HERD) So yes, the capitalism vs socialism is a false dichotomy that is perhaps the best persistent example of using pilpul and critique to present a straw man argument when all economies must be mixed because defense of the private for the purpose of consumption and the common for the purpose of preservation are two very different things requiring two different kinds of enforcement. We must have markets for association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, elites and their strategies, and polities. Because markets calculate the unknown. Its only backward organizations that can use authority for short periods to adapt (transform) to a new technology using a novel set of incentives. This is the value of executive and states: to reorganize incentives that have calcified. Answering the WHY IS IT…? Question is just (a) we make time through divisions of labor (b) we make more time the faster we identify and capture opportunities. (c.) for increasingly complex goods, services, and information, we produce longer more complex production cycles with more opportunities along the chain, in to more and more organizations in sustainable networks of specialization and trade. We are calculating a way of defeating the dark forces of time and ignorance in a window of opportunity between catastrophic events on a plant that has had a set of what I suspect are rare coincidences. Western man uses maneuver – ooda loops- to move faster than others. That’s it. And law, and markets in all aspects of life favor evolution, eugenics, and prosperity as a method of competitive advantage. And the weak spot in our civilization is that (a) until now it wasn’t codified in a sort of bible of the law, and (b) our women and some portion of our men will always be vulnerable to false promises that evolution and the red queen can be ignored rather than defeated.

  • Justice (reciprocity within the limits of proportionality) is measurable in the

    Justice (reciprocity within the limits of proportionality) is measurable in the case of instances. Wisdom (general rules of arbitrary precision given historical distribution of outcomes) are two different rules and measures. So he is correct. Wisdom =virtue. Justice=decides.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-13 22:45:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1172642403905355776

    Reply addressees: @eruditenights

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1172635372100079617


    IN REPLY TO:

    @eruditenights

    @curtdoolittle it’s hard for me to pull a direct quote but Cicero somewhat agrees with your view of Truth having precedence over Wisdom but instead saying Justice shall be prioritize over Wisdom even though he holds I believe that wisdom is the chief of the virtues

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1172635372100079617

  • It’s the only way they can warranty their work. Skin in the game. Warranty. That

    It’s the only way they can warranty their work.
    Skin in the game. Warranty. That will do it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-05 04:50:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1169472812723183616

    Reply addressees: @KurtSchlichter @stillgray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1169472444031295488


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @KurtSchlichter @stillgray Colleges and Universities carry the debt.
    That’s how to fix everything.
    😉

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1169472444031295488


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @KurtSchlichter @ianmiles Colleges and Universities carry the debt.
    That’s how to fix everything.
    😉

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1169472444031295488

  • ARISTOCRACY WESTERN TRIPARTISM MADE QUADRIPARTISM “THOSE WHO FIGHT” (Military, J

    ARISTOCRACY WESTERN TRIPARTISM MADE QUADRIPARTISM

    “THOSE WHO FIGHT” (Military, Judiciary, Sheriffs)
    Those Who Enforce The Natural Law

    “THOSE WHO PRAY” (Academy)
    Those Who Teach The Natural… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=459951561268406&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-04 21:44:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1169365634301517825

  • ARISTOCRACY WESTERN TRIPARTISM MADE QUADRIPARTISM “THOSE WHO FIGHT” (Military, J

    ARISTOCRACY WESTERN TRIPARTISM MADE QUADRIPARTISM

    “THOSE WHO FIGHT” (Military, Judiciary, Sheriffs)

    Those Who Enforce The Natural Law

    “THOSE WHO PRAY” (Academy)

    Those Who Teach The Natural and Physical Laws

    “THOSE WHO ORGANIZE” (Middle Class)

    Those Who Organize Those Who Labor Under the Natural and Physical laws

    “THOSE WHO LABOR” (Lower middle, Working, Laboring)

    Those Who Labor Under The Natural and Physical Laws


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-04 17:44:00 UTC

  • The Answer 1. Life; 2. Life’s Cost in Time; 3. Cooperation and its Returns of Ti

    The Answer

    1. Life;
    2. Life’s Cost in Time;
    3. Cooperation and its Returns of Time on Time;
    4. Truth, Oath, Trust, Knowledge, Proximity, and Density increase the velocity of the Production… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=459307324666163&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-03 17:42:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1168942313722322944