Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Assertion: all differences are reducible to right reciprocal falsificationary eu

    Assertion: all differences are reducible to right reciprocal falsificationary eugenic vs left proportional justificationary dysgenic, and as such, decidable. a such all left propositions must be reducible to approval/disapproval, and right truth/falsehood.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 12:33:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223947619552169984

    Reply addressees: @flancian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223946186589200384

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @flancian sure. 😉

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223946186589200384

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @flancian sure. 😉

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223946186589200384

  • My premise is either you’re testifying truthfully and warrantying that you will

    My premise is either you’re testifying truthfully and warrantying that you will perform restitution if you lie, or that you’re just lying.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 03:46:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223815040572280834

    Reply addressees: @TheocraticMona2 @EvaB57423389

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223814704038019072

    IN REPLY TO:

    @JCsBestLT

    @curtdoolittle @EvaB57423389 Your commingling of the Jewish/Abrahamic/Islamic/Christian is faulty premise. Think error carried forward. Much more to the abrahamic understanding than deceit. Very shallow. There’s is a very good reason the OT is diligent with tracing lineages.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223814704038019072

  • TO VIOLATE OUR SOVEREIGNTY IS TO INVITE US TO WAR See, you don’t get it. The onl

    TO VIOLATE OUR SOVEREIGNTY IS TO INVITE US TO WAR

    See, you don’t get it. The only reason not to conquer, deprive, exploit, enserf, enslave, or end – or worse, is reciprocity.

    You see, ‘sovereign means’ capable of defense – every man a sovereign: a king, a legislature, a knight, a husband, a craftsman and all else he might be.

    That is why natural law and international law are the same: because no man has say over another unless he violates the sovereignty of another – and if so then they may war. If they choose not to war they may duel. If they choose not to duel they may seek decision from the people in a jury. If they do not abide by the jury they have lost the insurance of their sovereign peers, and are limited to their own defense. And as such, they will easily be the victims of war by the polity rather than just their prior enemy.

    We are the men of Europa.

    We are sovereigns – all.

    And to violate that sovereignty is to invite us into war.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:45:00 UTC

  • STATE RELIGION? —“Would a P government endorse a religion?”–Tim Abbott P-law

    STATE RELIGION?

    —“Would a P government endorse a religion?”–Tim Abbott

    P-law allows the truthful reciprocal construction of any form of government and any economy as long as it’s stated in strictly constructed p-law.

    A continuation of the european sovereigns under rule of law by natural law of reciprocity, that we see in the proto-germanic, germanic, anglo saxon, english, british, american constitutions would yes, permit and possibly require a state religion.

    It would require compatibility with natural law. This leaves only traditional european religions (all of them), and christianity, and prohibits all others. And it posits chirstianity in scientific terms.

    In general, history has taught us that state religion is necessary, and so it appears we will have a set of state religions and state funding of religion as we do schools. Even though that religion will cover a broad spectrum of secular, pagan, and monotheistic christian religions.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 09:52:00 UTC

  • Of course. 😉 Just staying on message. Sovereignty, rule of law of reciprocity,

    Of course. 😉 Just staying on message. Sovereignty, rule of law of reciprocity, truth, and incremental suppression of parasitism under it, with soft market eugenics and in six to ten generations most peoples can at least approach european social orders. (They won’t, but can.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 23:54:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223031706032246784

    Reply addressees: @SirJohn981

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223030662032130054

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223030662032130054

  • It’s not complicated – if you are intellectually honest. The problem is we all l

    It’s not complicated – if you are intellectually honest. The problem is we all live our little lies and frauds and free riding.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 18:23:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222948587396587520

    Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @Semiogogue @PropertarianBoi @JohnMarkSays @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222947284658401282

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222947284658401282

  • Propertarianism is a methodology. You can use that methodology to produce a cons

    Propertarianism is a methodology. You can use that methodology to produce a constitution for any form of political order.

    We recommend various political configurations depending upon the conditions.

    Majoritarian monopoly voting has a very bad record. We improve it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 02:07:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222702937996255232

    Reply addressees: @Semiogogue @PropertarianBoi @JohnMarkSays @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222699373743788037

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Semiogogue

    @PropertarianBoi @JohnMarkSays @EricLiford @curtdoolittle So people don’t vote in a Propertarian system?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222699373743788037

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/84526449_564095344187360_10543462584

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/84526449_564095344187360_1054346258497404928_o_564095337520694.jpg DEEP DIVE INTO PROPERTARIANISMDEEP DIVE INTO PROPERTARIANISM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 18:09:00 UTC

  • Our Genome is our property. Yes. Why? Because we and our ancestors demonstrated

    Our Genome is our property. Yes. Why? Because we and our ancestors demonstrated interest in it. And we defend it. Therefore it is. Now, you know, we’re happy to get rid of the bottom, as a sacrifice for improving the genomes of others. But that doesn’t mean you can consume our commons. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 16:12:00 UTC

  • THERE IS ONLY ONE LAW There is only one law with two faces, and that is the law

    THERE IS ONLY ONE LAW

    There is only one law with two faces, and that is the law of reciprocity: in the negative as prohibitions – that is the contribution of european man; and on the inverse, the law of exhausting interpersonal forgiveness : in the positive: as demands – that is the contribution of christianity.

    The Pagan European command of paternalism to domesticate humans from slaves to serfs to freemen, and if possible to citizens and sovereigns. And the monotheistic resistance to domestication by the extension of kinship love to non kin.

    The original christianity was just another peasant rebellion against better people wanting to domesticate half human animals. The byzantine compromise was a practical solution to the greco roman empire’s loss of wealth and military power: like communism a false promise of reward in the next world, instead of economic reward after a revolution – neither of which is possible.

    Eventually, we germanized christianity and made it into something decent. It took a long time to undo the horror and corruption of the catholic church. Eventually the Orthodox preserved the ritualism without the politics. Eventually adam smith wrote down ethics in scientific terms, hume the human mind in scientific terms, and slowly we have dragged ourselves kiking and screaming to restore the two thousand years we lost to semitic underclass dark ages of resistance to mans domestication transcendence, and eugenic evolution.

    So it is possibly true that that the extension of kinship love to non kin is a good thing. It is possibly true that piety for those lacking agency and ability is a good thing. It is better however that we limit the extension of love to kin groups; and that we substitute loyalty to one another rather than piety to a false god.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 11:21:00 UTC